Re: [Finale] The ARCHIVE Password

2005-01-28 Thread Mark D Lew
On Jan 27, 2005, at 2:21 AM, d. collins wrote: For what it's worth, I guess my preference would be that the Finale List archives remain google-able, but it's only a slight preference. It's not something that I care about enough to lobby for. Why Google, since it's possible to have searchable

Re: [Finale] Synful Orchestra

2005-01-28 Thread Eden - Lawrence D.
Well, I have waited long enoughwhat is NAMM? On Thu, 27 Jan 2005, Allen Fisher wrote: I heard it at NAMM, and the sounds are nice. Windows only, though... On 1/26/05 3:42 PM, Matthew Hindson Fastmail Account [EMAIL PROTECTED] saith: With all the problems that some people are having

Re: [Finale] Old Finale files

2005-01-28 Thread Andrew Stiller
FinMac 2.X will definitely run in real System 9--I don't know about Classic. But it won't print, so all such files need to be upgraded. 2.X files can definitely be opened in both 2K2 and 2K4, even though 2K2 doesn't recognize them as Finale files (choose the All Files option in the Open

Re: [Finale] Old Finale files

2005-01-28 Thread Gerald Berg
Thank you all I've been mucking around with it and it seems all my diskette versions of Finale 3.5.2 (1994) and earlier seem to have been degraded and are unreadable rather than incompatible. I am using a 68k machine -- it is just 2 scores that I am trying to save -- one from 1989 and one

Re: [Finale] The ARCHIVE Password

2005-01-28 Thread A-NO-NE Music
Mark D Lew / 05.1.28 / 05:01 AM wrote: As for privacy, I don't think of this list as being private at all; I think of it as public. That's not the point. I just ran Google with your email address (not name but address), and there you are so many hits. You don't mind this? I do. -- -

Re: [Finale] Garritan

2005-01-28 Thread A-NO-NE Music
Gary Griffiths / 05.1.28 / 02:38 AM wrote: Does it work seamlessly with Human Playback once installed? Do you have to pick different samples for everything (solos, pizz, arco, trem etc. etc. etc.) or does that work seamlessly too? My scores are quite meticulous in their dynamics, articulations

[Finale] yellow box

2005-01-28 Thread Pierre Bailleul
Dear list, I don't remember the way to delete yellow boxes on the left off the first system in page view? Thanks Pierre. ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Re: [Finale] Garritan

2005-01-28 Thread Jari Williamsson
Gary Griffiths wrote: Does it work seamlessly with Human Playback once installed? Do you have to pick different samples for everything (solos, pizz, arco, trem etc. etc. etc.) or does that work seamlessly too? My scores are quite meticulous in their dynamics, articulations etc. Would Finale and

Re: [Finale] [OT] Curious ... who did it?

2005-01-28 Thread Mark D Lew
On Jan 28, 2005, at 9:40 AM, Michael L. Meyer wrote: In two of those, someone posted a reply designed to make me feel like an idiot. Call me thin-skinned, but that doesn't feel much like the caring and supportive community so many have claimed this list to be. Yes, I will call you thin-skinned.

Re: [Finale] Garritan

2005-01-28 Thread Mark D Lew
On Jan 28, 2005, at 8:28 AM, A-NO-NE Music wrote: I use Finale playback only to proofread, but I never want to have Finale sequence music. Am I way off? That is how I use Finale as well. Unfortunately for us, that's not how the business works. I'm just happy that Finale doesn't let its

Re: [Finale] The ARCHIVE Password

2005-01-28 Thread Mark D Lew
On Jan 28, 2005, at 8:22 AM, A-NO-NE Music wrote: That's not the point. I just ran Google with your email address (not name but address), and there you are so many hits. You don't mind this? I do. Not really. It bothers me much more that every time I go to an airport, bank, shopping mall,

Re: [Finale] [OT] Curious ... who did it?

2005-01-28 Thread John Howell
At 12:40 PM -0500 1/28/05, Michael L. Meyer wrote: If your reply was more light-hearted than that, John, then I apologize -- but it's too hard to read into people's tone of voice on e-mail, and I have had too many listserv experiences (here, the Logic-Users forum, heck even the listserv for my

Re: [Finale] Garritan

2005-01-28 Thread Raymond Horton
Mark D Lew wrote: On Jan 28, 2005, at 8:28 AM, A-NO-NE Music wrote: I use Finale playback only to proofread, but I never want to have Finale sequence music. Am I way off? That is how I use Finale as well. Unfortunately for us, that's not how the business works. I'm just happy that Finale

Re: [Finale] [OT] Curious ... who did it?

2005-01-28 Thread Michael L. Meyer
On 1/28/05 1:12 PM, John Howell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 12:40 PM -0500 1/28/05, Michael L. Meyer wrote: If your reply was more light-hearted than that, John, then I apologize -- but it's too hard to read into people's tone of voice on e-mail, and I have had too many listserv experiences

Re: [Finale] up grade advice

2005-01-28 Thread Allen Fisher
Len-- I suggest using the platform you're most comfortable with. While I can get along on either platform, most of my software is in Windows, so buying a Mac would have a bunch of added expense for me (I know I could use Virtual PC, but that's unacceptable to me). As far as what Mac to buy, I

[Finale] HP plub-in

2005-01-28 Thread Harold Owen
Hello Finale Wizards. I have a few questions about the new HP plug-in. I'm on an iMac G4 running Fin2k5a with I GB RAM and 800 MHz. 1) If I run the plug-in on a whole file, then save the file, will the HP data be saved with it? 2) When I play the file after running the plug-in with HP turned

Re: [Finale] The ARCHIVE Password

2005-01-28 Thread Mariposa Symphony Orchestra
I'm becoming more and more ambivalentin the offense battle against spam, which it appears we're losing on a monumental scale. My personal approach has been to pragmatically shift from endorsing the capture and painful execution of the perps (!)to basically creating a firewall with as much

[Finale] [Fwd: Baroque ornamentation]

2005-01-28 Thread Herb Pettersen
Joined this group recently to learn anything I could about Finale. Not having grown up in the computer age (being well into my 8th decade now), the learning curve on Finale for the past two years has been slow, by fits and starts. I am mostly doing big band arrangements/missing parts. My

[Finale] OT: Memory Cell

2005-01-28 Thread Darcy James Argue
OS X users who want to easily monitor how much physical and/or virtual RAM they are using may be interested in this freeware utility from Rogue Amoeba software called Memory Cell: http://rogueamoeba.com/freebies/ I've been using it for the past couple of days and it's quite nifty. - Darcy -

Re: [Finale] [Fwd: Baroque ornamentation]

2005-01-28 Thread Johannes Gebauer
I am not sure I understand what is desired here. What exactly should the plugin do? Johannes Herb Pettersen wrote: Joined this group recently to learn anything I could about Finale. Not having grown up in the computer age (being well into my 8th decade now), the learning curve on Finale for

Re: [Finale] The ARCHIVE Password

2005-01-28 Thread Brad Beyenhof
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 21:14:04 +0100, d. collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Owain Sutton écrit: If you feel this way about privacy, you shouldn't be sending messages through mailing lists such as this - sending messages to an unknown number of recipients and then complaining that your address is

Re: [Finale] Garritan

2005-01-28 Thread dhbailey
A-NO-NE Music wrote: I believe notation and sequence is not interchangeable. Notation is so organic that motivate human performer, and it never is a data for machine to playback. I use Finale playback only to proofread, but I never want to have Finale sequence music. Am I way off? For many of

Re: [Finale] OT: Memory Cell

2005-01-28 Thread laloba2
Oh yeathese are the guys that make Audio Hijack! Thanks Darcy...this is a great little program. -K OS X users who want to easily monitor how much physical and/or virtual RAM they are using may be interested in this freeware utility from Rogue Amoeba software called Memory Cell:

Re: [Finale] The ARCHIVE Password

2005-01-28 Thread dhbailey
Owain Sutton wrote: Mark D Lew wrote: On Jan 28, 2005, at 8:22 AM, A-NO-NE Music wrote: That's not the point. I just ran Google with your email address (not name but address), and there you are so many hits. You don't mind this? I do. Not really. It bothers me much more that every time I go

RE: [Finale] [Fwd: Baroque ornamentation]

2005-01-28 Thread Larry Kent
You might have your friend check out Ansgar Krause's fonts at http://www.ansgarkrause.de/fonts.htm I do a lot of editing and typesetting of baroque scores, and don't know how I got along before being pointed toward these plugins. Larry Kent Tampa, FL [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Herb Pettersen

Re: [Finale] HP plug-in

2005-01-28 Thread Allen Fisher
On 1/28/05 1:59 PM, Harold Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] saith: Hello Finale Wizards. I have a few questions about the new HP plug-in. I'm on an iMac G4 running Fin2k5a with I GB RAM and 800 MHz. 1) If I run the plug-in on a whole file, then save the file, will the HP data be saved with it?

Re: [Finale] Old Finale files

2005-01-28 Thread Gerald Berg
Thanks everyone. I managed to open a Finale 2.6 program and that brought the older files within reach of Finale 97. Remember the Monk figure? I always thought it looked Inuit or Eskimo for those P.I. Americans. While I was at it I looked inside the Holiday Disk -- Looks as though it was a

Re: [Finale] HP plug-in

2005-01-28 Thread Jari Williamsson
Allen Fisher wrote: The advantages are: 1. The HP MIDI data will be retained in the file, not blown away when playback is stopped. 2. If you don't like how HP's interpreting something, you can use the MIDI tool to tweak it. The biggest advantage is speed! There is no preprocessing delay if you

Re: [Finale] [Fwd: Baroque ornamentation]

2005-01-28 Thread Johannes Gebauer
Just to clarify, Ansgar sells fonts, and to my knowledge he doesn't have any plugins. Johannes Larry Kent wrote: You might have your friend check out Ansgar Krause's fonts at http://www.ansgarkrause.de/fonts.htm I do a lot of editing and typesetting of baroque scores, and don't know how I got

Re: [Finale] The ARCHIVE Password

2005-01-28 Thread Simon Troup
I'd just like to chip in that if you do a search for [EMAIL PROTECTED] you get a bunch of hits from mailing lists such as PHP and Suse Linux - I didn't realise that those lists published their archives WITH email addresses to the web. That scenario is clearly stupid and should be avoided at

Re: [Finale] The ARCHIVE Password

2005-01-28 Thread Owain Sutton
Simon Troup wrote: I'd just like to chip in that if you do a search for [EMAIL PROTECTED] you get a bunch of hits from mailing lists such as PHP and Suse Linux - I didn't realise that those lists published their archives WITH email addresses to the web. That scenario is clearly stupid and

Re: [Finale] The ARCHIVE Password

2005-01-28 Thread Simon Troup
I tire of this belief that all spam is from harvested emails. A good proportion of the spam I receive (on several different accounts) is also CCed to endless permutations of my surname - all it takes is a list of first names, a list of surnames, a list of top level domains, and software.

Re: [Finale] The ARCHIVE Password

2005-01-28 Thread Owain Sutton
Simon Troup wrote: I tire of this belief that all spam is from harvested emails. A good proportion of the spam I receive (on several different accounts) is also CCed to endless permutations of my surname - all it takes is a list of first names, a list of surnames, a list of top level domains,

Re: [Finale] The ARCHIVE Password

2005-01-28 Thread David W. Fenton
On 28 Jan 2005 at 2:01, Mark D Lew wrote: On Jan 27, 2005, at 2:21 AM, d. collins wrote: For what it's worth, I guess my preference would be that the Finale List archives remain google-able, but it's only a slight preference. It's not something that I care about enough to lobby for.

Re: [Finale] Garritan

2005-01-28 Thread David W. Fenton
On 28 Jan 2005 at 11:28, A-NO-NE Music wrote: Gary Griffiths / 05.1.28 / 02:38 AM wrote: Does it work seamlessly with Human Playback once installed? Do you have to pick different samples for everything (solos, pizz, arco, trem etc. etc. etc.) or does that work seamlessly too? My scores are

Re: [Finale] The ARCHIVE Password

2005-01-28 Thread Simon Troup
I really agree with all of that. My only request of a public archive is that email addresses should be obfuscated so that spammers can't harvest them. If that can't be done, then no archive should be public. I whole heartedly agree with that statement. -- Simon Troup Digital Music Art

RE: [Finale] [Fwd: Baroque ornamentation]

2005-01-28 Thread David W. Fenton
On 28 Jan 2005 at 21:47, Larry Kent wrote: You might have your friend check out Ansgar Krause's fonts at http://www.ansgarkrause.de/fonts.htm I do a lot of editing and typesetting of baroque scores, and don't know how I got along before being pointed toward these plugins. Plugins? All I

Re: [Finale] The ARCHIVE Password

2005-01-28 Thread David W. Fenton
On 28 Jan 2005 at 23:36, Simon Troup wrote: I'd just like to chip in that if you do a search for [EMAIL PROTECTED] you get a bunch of hits from mailing lists such as PHP and Suse Linux - I didn't realise that those lists published their archives WITH email addresses to the web. Because of

Re: [Finale] The ARCHIVE Password

2005-01-28 Thread David W. Fenton
On 28 Jan 2005 at 23:50, Owain Sutton wrote: I tire of this belief that all spam is from harvested emails. A good proportion of the spam I receive (on several different accounts) is also CCed to endless permutations of my surname - all it takes is a list of first names, a list of surnames, a

Re: [Finale] The ARCHIVE Password

2005-01-28 Thread Simon Troup
That's odd, because when I see an email with a lot of addresses CC'd at my ISP, the addresses are all real addresses (I've checked by viewing the USR directory of my ISP's server). That shows that the addresses really *are* harvested, not made up by algorithm. This is not to say that

[Finale] OT: Mac Mini Mods...

2005-01-28 Thread laloba2
There are some interesting articles here today (1/28/05) on some of the modifications people are already doing to their Mac Minis (you'll have to scroll down a bit)...thought if might be of interest! I have a feeling it is going to be fun to see the creative things folks will be doing with

[Finale] OT: Mac Mini Mods...

2005-01-28 Thread laloba2
P.S...apparently apple has also dropped the prices on some of the options for the Mac Mini...they offer a refund for those who have already ordered the mini if it was shipped within a certain time frame of the price drop...at the same link...here it is again... http://www.xlr8yourmac.com/ -K

Re: [Finale] Garritan and other stuff

2005-01-28 Thread Chuck Israels
On Jan 28, 2005, at 5:22 PM, David W. Fenton wrote: To me, it's simply natural for the notation to produce a proper MIDI performance. Sequencers are unnatural for the way I think about music. I don't know if this is more than one can ask from the point of view of how computer programs work,

Re: [Finale] [Fwd: Baroque ornamentation]

2005-01-28 Thread Noel Stoutenburg
In response to Herb Pettersen, who wrote: My first call for help is on behalf of a music professor in town. He is interested in finding any plug-in for WinFin that could help on Baroque Ornamentation. Any suggestions? Dennis responded Is it simply a question of notating these ornements? In

Re: [Finale] OT: Who are you?

2005-01-28 Thread David McKay
Bob, thanks for starting this thread. Sorry,I read this thread so late. Like many others have said, I have played some of your arrangements in a school band, though I'm pleased to say that 5 years ago I escaped crowd control [which some people call high school music teaching] and have been