On Jan 27, 2005, at 2:21 AM, d. collins wrote:
For what it's worth, I guess my preference would be that the Finale
List archives remain google-able, but it's only a slight preference.
It's not something that I care about enough to lobby for.
Why Google, since it's possible to have searchable
Well, I have waited long enoughwhat is NAMM?
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005, Allen Fisher wrote:
I heard it at NAMM, and the sounds are nice. Windows only, though...
On 1/26/05 3:42 PM, Matthew Hindson Fastmail Account
[EMAIL PROTECTED] saith:
With all the problems that some people are having
FinMac 2.X will definitely run in real System 9--I don't know about
Classic. But it won't print, so all such files need to be upgraded.
2.X files can definitely be opened in both 2K2 and 2K4, even though 2K2
doesn't recognize them as Finale files (choose the All Files option
in the Open
Thank you all
I've been mucking around with it and it seems all my diskette versions
of Finale 3.5.2 (1994) and earlier seem to have been degraded and are
unreadable rather than incompatible. I am using a 68k machine -- it is
just 2 scores that I am trying to save -- one from 1989 and one
Mark D Lew / 05.1.28 / 05:01 AM wrote:
As
for privacy, I don't think of this list as being private at all; I
think of it as public.
That's not the point.
I just ran Google with your email address (not name but address), and
there you are so many hits. You don't mind this? I do.
--
-
Gary Griffiths / 05.1.28 / 02:38 AM wrote:
Does it work seamlessly with Human Playback once installed? Do you have to
pick different samples for everything (solos, pizz, arco, trem etc. etc.
etc.) or does that work seamlessly too? My scores are quite meticulous in
their dynamics, articulations
Dear list,
I don't remember the way to delete yellow boxes on the left off the first
system in page view?
Thanks
Pierre.
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Gary Griffiths wrote:
Does it work seamlessly with Human Playback once installed? Do you have
to pick different samples for everything (solos, pizz, arco, trem etc.
etc. etc.) or does that work seamlessly too? My scores are quite
meticulous in their dynamics, articulations etc. Would Finale and
On Jan 28, 2005, at 9:40 AM, Michael L. Meyer wrote:
In two of those, someone posted a reply
designed to make me feel like an idiot. Call me thin-skinned, but that
doesn't feel much like the caring and supportive community so many have
claimed this list to be.
Yes, I will call you thin-skinned.
On Jan 28, 2005, at 8:28 AM, A-NO-NE Music wrote:
I use Finale playback only to proofread, but I never want to have
Finale
sequence music. Am I way off?
That is how I use Finale as well. Unfortunately for us, that's not how
the business works. I'm just happy that Finale doesn't let its
On Jan 28, 2005, at 8:22 AM, A-NO-NE Music wrote:
That's not the point.
I just ran Google with your email address (not name but address), and
there you are so many hits. You don't mind this? I do.
Not really. It bothers me much more that every time I go to an
airport, bank, shopping mall,
At 12:40 PM -0500 1/28/05, Michael L. Meyer wrote:
If your reply was more light-hearted than that, John, then I apologize --
but it's too hard to read into people's tone of voice on e-mail, and I
have had too many listserv experiences (here, the Logic-Users forum, heck
even the listserv for my
Mark D Lew wrote:
On Jan 28, 2005, at 8:28 AM, A-NO-NE Music wrote:
I use Finale playback only to proofread, but I never want to have Finale
sequence music. Am I way off?
That is how I use Finale as well. Unfortunately for us, that's not
how the business works. I'm just happy that Finale
On 1/28/05 1:12 PM, John Howell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 12:40 PM -0500 1/28/05, Michael L. Meyer wrote:
If your reply was more light-hearted than that, John, then I apologize --
but it's too hard to read into people's tone of voice on e-mail, and I
have had too many listserv experiences
Len--
I suggest using the platform you're most comfortable with. While I can get
along on either platform, most of my software is in Windows, so buying a Mac
would have a bunch of added expense for me (I know I could use Virtual PC,
but that's unacceptable to me).
As far as what Mac to buy, I
Hello Finale Wizards.
I have a few questions about the new HP plug-in. I'm on an iMac G4
running Fin2k5a with I GB RAM and 800 MHz.
1) If I run the plug-in on a whole file, then save the file, will the
HP data be saved with it?
2) When I play the file after running the plug-in with HP turned
I'm becoming more and more ambivalentin
the offense battle against spam, which it appears we're losing on a
monumental scale. My personal approach has been to pragmatically
shift from endorsing the capture and painful execution of the perps (!)to
basically creating a firewall with as much
Joined this group recently to learn anything I could about Finale. Not
having grown up in the computer age (being well into my 8th decade
now), the learning curve on Finale for the past two years has been
slow, by fits and starts. I am mostly doing big band
arrangements/missing parts.
My
OS X users who want to easily monitor how much physical and/or virtual
RAM they are using may be interested in this freeware utility from
Rogue Amoeba software called Memory Cell:
http://rogueamoeba.com/freebies/
I've been using it for the past couple of days and it's quite nifty.
- Darcy
-
I am not sure I understand what is desired here. What exactly should the
plugin do?
Johannes
Herb Pettersen wrote:
Joined this group recently to learn anything I could about Finale. Not
having grown up in the computer age (being well into my 8th decade
now), the learning curve on Finale for
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 21:14:04 +0100, d. collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Owain Sutton écrit:
If you feel this way about privacy, you shouldn't be sending messages
through mailing lists such as this - sending messages to an unknown number
of recipients and then complaining that your address is
A-NO-NE Music wrote:
I believe notation and sequence is not interchangeable. Notation is so
organic that motivate human performer, and it never is a data for machine
to playback.
I use Finale playback only to proofread, but I never want to have Finale
sequence music. Am I way off?
For many of
Oh yeathese are the guys that make Audio Hijack! Thanks
Darcy...this is a great little program.
-K
OS X users who want to easily monitor how much physical and/or
virtual RAM they are using may be interested in this freeware
utility from Rogue Amoeba software called Memory Cell:
Owain Sutton wrote:
Mark D Lew wrote:
On Jan 28, 2005, at 8:22 AM, A-NO-NE Music wrote:
That's not the point.
I just ran Google with your email address (not name but address), and
there you are so many hits. You don't mind this? I do.
Not really. It bothers me much more that every time I go
You might have your friend check out Ansgar Krause's fonts at
http://www.ansgarkrause.de/fonts.htm
I do a lot of editing and typesetting of baroque scores, and don't know how
I got along before being pointed toward these plugins.
Larry Kent
Tampa, FL
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Herb Pettersen
On 1/28/05 1:59 PM, Harold Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] saith:
Hello Finale Wizards.
I have a few questions about the new HP plug-in. I'm on an iMac G4
running Fin2k5a with I GB RAM and 800 MHz.
1) If I run the plug-in on a whole file, then save the file, will the
HP data be saved with it?
Thanks everyone.
I managed to open a Finale 2.6 program and that brought the older files
within reach of Finale 97. Remember the Monk figure? I always thought
it looked Inuit or Eskimo for those P.I. Americans.
While I was at it I looked inside the Holiday Disk -- Looks as though
it was a
Allen Fisher wrote:
The advantages are:
1. The HP MIDI data will be retained in the file, not blown away when
playback is stopped.
2. If you don't like how HP's interpreting something, you can use the MIDI
tool to tweak it.
The biggest advantage is speed! There is no preprocessing delay if you
Just to clarify, Ansgar sells fonts, and to my knowledge he doesn't have
any plugins.
Johannes
Larry Kent wrote:
You might have your friend check out Ansgar Krause's fonts at
http://www.ansgarkrause.de/fonts.htm
I do a lot of editing and typesetting of baroque scores, and don't know
how I got
I'd just like to chip in that if you do a search for [EMAIL PROTECTED] you get
a bunch of hits from mailing lists such as PHP and Suse Linux - I didn't
realise that those lists published their archives WITH email addresses to the
web.
That scenario is clearly stupid and should be avoided at
Simon Troup wrote:
I'd just like to chip in that if you do a search for [EMAIL PROTECTED] you get a bunch of hits from mailing lists such as PHP and Suse Linux - I didn't realise that those lists published their archives WITH email addresses to the web.
That scenario is clearly stupid and
I tire of this belief that all spam is from harvested emails. A good
proportion of the spam I receive (on several different accounts) is
also CCed to endless permutations of my surname - all it takes is a
list of first names, a list of surnames, a list of top level domains,
and software.
Simon Troup wrote:
I tire of this belief that all spam is from harvested emails. A good
proportion of the spam I receive (on several different accounts) is
also CCed to endless permutations of my surname - all it takes is a
list of first names, a list of surnames, a list of top level domains,
On 28 Jan 2005 at 2:01, Mark D Lew wrote:
On Jan 27, 2005, at 2:21 AM, d. collins wrote:
For what it's worth, I guess my preference would be that the Finale
List archives remain google-able, but it's only a slight
preference. It's not something that I care about enough to lobby
for.
On 28 Jan 2005 at 11:28, A-NO-NE Music wrote:
Gary Griffiths / 05.1.28 / 02:38 AM wrote:
Does it work seamlessly with Human Playback once installed? Do you
have to pick different samples for everything (solos, pizz, arco,
trem etc. etc. etc.) or does that work seamlessly too? My scores are
I really agree with all of that. My only request of a public archive
is that email addresses should be obfuscated so that spammers can't
harvest them. If that can't be done, then no archive should be
public.
I whole heartedly agree with that statement.
--
Simon Troup
Digital Music Art
On 28 Jan 2005 at 21:47, Larry Kent wrote:
You might have your friend check out Ansgar Krause's fonts at
http://www.ansgarkrause.de/fonts.htm
I do a lot of editing and typesetting of baroque scores, and don't
know how I got along before being pointed toward these plugins.
Plugins? All I
On 28 Jan 2005 at 23:36, Simon Troup wrote:
I'd just like to chip in that if you do a search for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] you get a bunch of hits from mailing
lists such as PHP and Suse Linux - I didn't realise that those lists
published their archives WITH email addresses to the web.
Because of
On 28 Jan 2005 at 23:50, Owain Sutton wrote:
I tire of this belief that all spam is from harvested emails. A good
proportion of the spam I receive (on several different accounts) is
also CCed to endless permutations of my surname - all it takes is a
list of first names, a list of surnames, a
That's odd, because when I see an email with a lot of addresses CC'd
at my ISP, the addresses are all real addresses (I've checked by
viewing the USR directory of my ISP's server). That shows that the
addresses really *are* harvested, not made up by algorithm.
This is not to say that
There are some interesting articles here today (1/28/05) on some of
the modifications people are already doing to their Mac Minis (you'll
have to scroll down a bit)...thought if might be of interest! I have
a feeling it is going to be fun to see the creative things folks will
be doing with
P.S...apparently apple has also dropped the prices on some of the
options for the Mac Mini...they offer a refund for those who have
already ordered the mini if it was shipped within a certain time
frame of the price drop...at the same link...here it is again...
http://www.xlr8yourmac.com/
-K
On Jan 28, 2005, at 5:22 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
To me, it's simply natural for the notation to produce a proper MIDI
performance. Sequencers are unnatural for the way I think about
music.
I don't know if this is more than one can ask from the point of view of how computer programs work,
In response to Herb Pettersen, who wrote:
My first call for help is on behalf of a music professor in town. He
is interested in finding any plug-in for WinFin that could help on
Baroque Ornamentation. Any suggestions?
Dennis responded
Is it simply a question of notating these ornements? In
Bob, thanks for starting this thread. Sorry,I read
this thread so late.
Like many others have said, I have played some of your
arrangements in a school band, though I'm pleased to
say that 5 years ago I escaped crowd control [which
some people call high school music teaching] and have
been
45 matches
Mail list logo