Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO

2005-07-16 Thread dhbailey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With all of the hoopla about no saxes in GPO, If I remember correctly the Kontakt player that will be part of Finale 2006 will be able to load any NI Samples. Since the sounds that ship with Sibelius play thru their Kompakt player, I wonder if the Sibelius sounds will

Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO

2005-07-16 Thread Tyler Turner
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > With all of the hoopla about no saxes in GPO, If I > remember correctly the > Kontakt player that will be part of Finale 2006 will > be able to load any NI > Samples. Since the sounds that ship with Sibelius > play thru their Kompakt player, > I wonder if the

Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO

2005-07-16 Thread FinaleMAC
With all of the hoopla about no saxes in GPO, If I remember correctly the Kontakt player that will be part of Finale 2006 will be able to load any NI Samples.  Since the sounds that ship with Sibelius play thru their Kompakt player, I wonder if the Sibelius sounds will show up as an option in Fina

Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO -- MakeMusic's reply to my request for saxophones

2005-07-15 Thread Tyler Turner
--- Lon Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jul 15, 2005, at 2:07 PM, Chuck Israels wrote: > > > You have to suspend disbelief in order to accept > any of these > > sounds. They only remotely resemble the sound of > the instruments > > they represent. I'd like saxophones too, but whe

Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO

2005-07-15 Thread Lon Price
On Jul 15, 2005, at 3:18 PM, Darcy James Argue wrote:Lon, GPO Jazz/Big Band will have the full range of saxophones, from sopranino through sub-contrabass, and including C-melody and mezzo-soprano saxes. (Personally, I think that's overkill, but this sounds like something you'd want to pick up.)

Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO -- MakeMusic's reply to my request for saxophones

2005-07-15 Thread Lon Price
On Jul 15, 2005, at 2:07 PM, Chuck Israels wrote:You have to suspend disbelief in order to accept any of these sounds.  They only remotely resemble the sound of the instruments they represent.  I'd like saxophones too, but when they come, they won't sound real anyway.  For me, it's not that much of

Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO

2005-07-15 Thread Darcy James Argue
On 15 Jul 2005, at 6:11 PM, Lon Price wrote: Being a sax player myself, I find this thread well, amusing.  But seriously, there's not much out there in sample library that comes even close to covering saxophones.  The Vienna Library saxes ($265 at Sweetwater) have only tenor and soprano--no a

Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO

2005-07-15 Thread Lon Price
Being a sax player myself, I find this thread well, amusing.  But seriously, there's not much out there in sample library that comes even close to covering saxophones.  The Vienna Library saxes ($265 at Sweetwater) have only tenor and soprano--no alto or bari even.  Forget C-melody, bass, contraba

Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO

2005-07-15 Thread Dean M. Estabrook
ok, I think I'm beginning to get the picture, though my inexperience in this area blurs the concept considerably. For example, if I were to purchase GPO, and create a fin file, I don't even understand how those wonderful GPO sounds would become my mode of playback, with my present system. I'

Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO -- MakeMusic's reply to my request for saxophones

2005-07-15 Thread Chuck Israels
On Jul 15, 2005, at 12:27 PM, dhbailey wrote:Neither is better in my estimation -- imagine sending a recording of a work you want published or performed to a potential publisher or director and having to explain that it's not actually a realistic sound becaue those extra clarinet or bassoon sounds

Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO -- MakeMusic's reply to my request for saxophones

2005-07-15 Thread dhbailey
Darcy James Argue wrote: [snip]> Now, imagine sending a recording of a work you want published or performed to a potential publisher or director and having to explain that due to software limitations, the recording only includes 8 simultaneous instruments! I wouldn't do that, either. :-)

Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO -- MakeMusic's reply to my request for saxophones

2005-07-15 Thread dhbailey
Tyler Turner wrote: [snip]> You're reading too much into Phil's response. The guy apparently screwed up and didn't really understand your question. With each new release, the support starts getting mauled with more questions, and it wouldn't surprise me if he's been working a lot of overtime (pr

Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO

2005-07-15 Thread David W. Fenton
On 15 Jul 2005 at 13:37, John Howell wrote: > At 10:21 AM -0700 7/15/05, Eric Dannewitz wrote: > >*tongue in cheek* Yeah, but when it does come out, it will have all > >those useful saxes like Contrabass, and C melody. Woohoo! > > > > > >Darcy James Argue wrote: > > > >>David, no offense, but how

Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO -- MakeMusic's reply to my request for saxophones

2005-07-15 Thread Tyler Turner
--- Darcy James Argue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 15 Jul 2005, at 2:32 PM, dhbailey wrote: > > > Your point being? Yes they do include those > instruments. but if the > > playback can't include the sax section, how will a > reasonable > > rendition of a band work be made? > > (A) With

Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO

2005-07-15 Thread David W. Fenton
On 15 Jul 2005 at 13:03, Darcy James Argue wrote: > On 15 Jul 2005, at 6:25 AM, dhbailey wrote: > > > So why isn't Finale going to include saxes? > > David, no offense, but how many times do you need this explained? > Fin2k6 doesn't include any GPO saxes because at the moment, there ARE > NO GP

Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO -- MakeMusic's reply to my request for saxophones

2005-07-15 Thread Darcy James Argue
On 15 Jul 2005, at 3:27 PM, dhbailey wrote: Darcy James Argue wrote: What's better, a Finale+GPO rendition of a concert band work that contains every concert band instrument except saxophones (substituting clarinets or double-reeds on their parts, as I do now), or a Sibelius rendition of th

Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO -- MakeMusic's reply to my request for saxophones

2005-07-15 Thread Tyler Turner
--- Darcy James Argue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 15 Jul 2005, at 2:32 PM, dhbailey wrote: > > > Your point being? Yes they do include those > instruments. but if the > > playback can't include the sax section, how will a > reasonable > > rendition of a band work be made? > > (A) With

Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO -- MakeMusic's reply to my request for saxophones

2005-07-15 Thread dhbailey
Darcy James Argue wrote: [snip] No, you cannot. Sibelius does not provide their own soundfont -- Finale does (in addition to the GPO sounds). I haven't used the Finale-provided soundfont other than to check my installation -- then I substitute one which I prefer for the Finale-provided one

Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO

2005-07-15 Thread Darcy James Argue
n 15 Jul 2005, at 2:43 PM, dhbailey wrote: Darcy James Argue wrote: On 15 Jul 2005, at 1:37 PM, John Howell wrote: Umm, am I the only one to whom it has occurred that at the very least, alto and tenor sax are ORCHESTRAL INSTRUMENTS, and are played with a sound the is quite different from a j

Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO -- MakeMusic's reply to my request for saxophones

2005-07-15 Thread Darcy James Argue
On 15 Jul 2005, at 2:32 PM, dhbailey wrote: Your point being? Yes they do include those instruments. but if the playback can't include the sax section, how will a reasonable rendition of a band work be made? (A) With other instruments covering the saxophone parts, same as what I do know wh

Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO

2005-07-15 Thread dhbailey
Darcy James Argue wrote: On 15 Jul 2005, at 1:37 PM, John Howell wrote: Umm, am I the only one to whom it has occurred that at the very least, alto and tenor sax are ORCHESTRAL INSTRUMENTS, and are played with a sound the is quite different from a jazz sound? As are the saxes in wind ensemb

Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO

2005-07-15 Thread dhbailey
Darcy James Argue wrote: On 15 Jul 2005, at 6:25 AM, dhbailey wrote: So why isn't Finale going to include saxes? David, no offense, but how many times do you need this explained? Fin2k6 doesn't include any GPO saxes because at the moment, there ARE NO GPO SAXES TO INCLUDE. The Jazz/Big

Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO -- MakeMusic's reply to my request for saxophones

2005-07-15 Thread dhbailey
Darcy James Argue wrote: [snip]> You then went on to pooh-pooh the fact that the included snare drum has both left- and right-hand hits, which is actually *extremely important* for marching band work. [snip] Are they matched grip or traditional grip? That's important, too. :-) -- David H. B

Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO -- MakeMusic's reply to my request for saxophones

2005-07-15 Thread dhbailey
Darcy James Argue wrote: On 15 Jul 2005, at 10:41 AM, dhbailey wrote: So much for MakeMusic's commitment to serve the educational community -- can anybody name any major concert band or jazz band or marching band works which don't include saxophones? David, are you even reading Tyler's post

Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO

2005-07-15 Thread Eric Dannewitz
Totally different sounds. As a saxophone major in college, I suffered through years of classical lessons. The tone and how you play as very different than jazz saxophone. John Howell wrote: Umm, am I the only one to whom it has occurred that at the very least, alto and tenor sax are ORCHE

Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO

2005-07-15 Thread Darcy James Argue
On 15 Jul 2005, at 1:37 PM, John Howell wrote: Umm, am I the only one to whom it has occurred that at the very least, alto and tenor sax are ORCHESTRAL INSTRUMENTS, and are played with a sound the is quite different from a jazz sound? As are the saxes in wind ensembles. Thinking that a singl

Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO

2005-07-15 Thread John Howell
At 10:21 AM -0700 7/15/05, Eric Dannewitz wrote: *tongue in cheek* Yeah, but when it does come out, it will have all those useful saxes like Contrabass, and C melody. Woohoo! Darcy James Argue wrote: David, no offense, but how many times do you need this explained? Fin2k6 doesn't include any

Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO

2005-07-15 Thread Eric Dannewitz
*tongue in cheek* Yeah, but when it does come out, it will have all those useful saxes like Contrabass, and C melody. Woohoo! Darcy James Argue wrote: David, no offense, but how many times do you need this explained? Fin2k6 doesn't include any GPO saxes because at the moment, there ARE NO G

Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO -- MakeMusic's reply to my request for saxophones

2005-07-15 Thread Darcy James Argue
On 15 Jul 2005, at 10:41 AM, dhbailey wrote: So much for MakeMusic's commitment to serve the educational community -- can anybody name any major concert band or jazz band or marching band works which don't include saxophones? David, are you even reading Tyler's posts? He wrote: Sibelius sh

Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO

2005-07-15 Thread Darcy James Argue
On 15 Jul 2005, at 6:25 AM, dhbailey wrote: So why isn't Finale going to include saxes? David, no offense, but how many times do you need this explained? Fin2k6 doesn't include any GPO saxes because at the moment, there ARE NO GPO SAXES TO INCLUDE. The Jazz/Big Band edition of GPO is NOT

Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO -- MakeMusic's reply to my request for saxophones

2005-07-15 Thread dhbailey
dhbailey wrote: dhbailey wrote: [snip] All MakeMusic has to do is to release Fianle2006 as they plan to, without the saxes, since they're not ready for release yet, and then release an update patch, like they do for the occasional interim bug-release (finale2005a, finale2005b, finale2005c

Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO

2005-07-15 Thread dhbailey
dhbailey wrote: [snip] All MakeMusic has to do is to release Fianle2006 as they plan to, without the saxes, since they're not ready for release yet, and then release an update patch, like they do for the occasional interim bug-release (finale2005a, finale2005b, finale2005c, whatever), which

Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO

2005-07-15 Thread Johannes Gebauer
dhbailey schrieb: If you want to use it for additional midi channels, you can send 16 channels to your Roland via your midi hookup and send 16 more channels through the smartmusic soundfont (you select that in the midi devices list) and then send the line-out jack to a mixer to combine with

Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO

2005-07-15 Thread dhbailey
Dean M. Estabrook wrote: Ah, what I do is create a finale file, which then, for playback, goes via my MIDI to my Roland J35 Keboard, thence to my stereo amp and speaker system, whence I hear it. Sorry I didn't clarify that. If you're producing midi output via an external keyboard, the s

Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO

2005-07-15 Thread dhbailey
John Bell wrote: On 15 Jul 2005, at 03:53, dhbailey wrote: But they list the Jazz & Big Band Collection for sale (I was terribly wrong about the price -- it's a whopping $259 dollars more, and that's a special deal for Finale users!) so they could include a tickler about how they'll be rele

Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO

2005-07-15 Thread dhbailey
Tyler Turner wrote: [snip] For the moment, Finale is leagues ahead of Sibelius in terms of playback. Actually, Finale is only leagues ahead of Sibelius in terms of playback with included 3rd-party add-on, and then only for those who are orchestrally inclined, not for those who work in the

Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO

2005-07-15 Thread Johannes Gebauer
Dean M. Estabrook schrieb: Ah, what I do is create a finale file, which then, for playback, goes via my MIDI to my Roland J35 Keboard, thence to my stereo amp and speaker system, whence I hear it. Sorry I didn't clarify that. Yes, but then you are not using and cannot use the Finale soundf

Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO

2005-07-14 Thread Dean M. Estabrook
Ah, what I do is create a finale file, which then, for playback, goes via my MIDI to my Roland J35 Keboard, thence to my stereo amp and speaker system, whence I hear it. Sorry I didn't clarify that. Dean On Jul 14, 2005, at 11:44 AM, Johannes Gebauer wrote: Dean M. Estabrook schrieb: H

Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO

2005-07-14 Thread John Bell
On 15 Jul 2005, at 03:53, dhbailey wrote:But they list the Jazz & Big Band Collection for sale (I was terribly wrong about the price -- it's a whopping $259 dollars more, and that's a special deal for Finale users!) so they could include a tickler about how they'll be releasing an update patch of t

Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO

2005-07-14 Thread dhbailey
John Bell wrote: On 15 Jul 2005, at 03:04, dhbailey wrote: Oh, definitely for me! I relish the thought of having to pay another $150 or so to get the sounds of an instrument which it is unthinkable to leave out of a quite large share of the composition/engraving field, namely Concert Band,

Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO

2005-07-14 Thread Tyler Turner
--- dhbailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > John Wyman wrote: > > > I talked with a rep at MakeMusic yesterday about > the absence of > > saxophones in the GPO set that come with 2006. > There will be none in the > > full version of GPO either, for saxophones one > must purchase the jazz > > G

Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO

2005-07-14 Thread John Bell
On 15 Jul 2005, at 03:04, dhbailey wrote:Oh, definitely for me!  I relish the thought of having to pay another $150 or so to get the sounds of an instrument which it is unthinkable to leave out of a quite large share of the composition/engraving field, namely Concert Band, to say nothing about Jazz

Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO

2005-07-14 Thread Darcy James Argue
On 14 Jul 2005, at 10:04 PM, dhbailey wrote: John Wyman wrote: I talked with a rep at MakeMusic yesterday about the absence of saxophones in the GPO set that come with 2006. There will be none in the full version of GPO either, for saxophones one must purchase the jazz GPO package. Can this

Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO

2005-07-14 Thread dhbailey
Johannes Gebauer wrote: Dean M. Estabrook schrieb: How does one access the smartmusic soundfount for playback (not through the internal speaker) with Mac Fin 04c? Not sure how you mean. Where would the sound come out if not the internal speaker? Johannes The line-out jack. -- David

Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO

2005-07-14 Thread dhbailey
John Wyman wrote: I talked with a rep at MakeMusic yesterday about the absence of saxophones in the GPO set that come with 2006. There will be none in the full version of GPO either, for saxophones one must purchase the jazz GPO package. Can this be a blessing in disguise? Oh, definitely

Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO

2005-07-14 Thread Johannes Gebauer
Dean M. Estabrook schrieb: How does one access the smartmusic soundfount for playback (not through the internal speaker) with Mac Fin 04c? Not sure how you mean. Where would the sound come out if not the internal speaker? Johannes -- http://www.musikmanufaktur.com http://www.camerata-berol

RE: [Finale] 2006/GPO

2005-07-14 Thread ronan
re when F2006 arrives. Best, Ron http://www.RonaldJBrown.com -Original Message- From: dhbailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: July 14, 2005 5:32 AM To: finale@shsu.edu Subject: Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO Tyler Turner wrote: [snip]> > > For most of the instruments, you get a si

Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO

2005-07-14 Thread Dean M. Estabrook
How does one access the smartmusic soundfount for playback (not through the internal speaker) with Mac Fin 04c? Dean On Jul 14, 2005, at 2:31 AM, dhbailey wrote: ronan wrote: Oh well. At least Tyler's review in another post leaves me hopeful that playback in Fin2006 using GPO will be at lea

Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO

2005-07-14 Thread John Wyman
I talked with a rep at MakeMusic yesterday about the absence of saxophones in the GPO set that come with 2006. There will be none in the full version of GPO either, for saxophones one must purchase the jazz GPO package. Can this be a blessing in disguise?John WymanI have just one question concernin

Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO

2005-07-14 Thread Christopher Smith
On Jul 14, 2005, at 5:38 AM, dhbailey wrote: Well, let me qualify that -- the sounds are unsatisfying, even if not having to deal with all the egos and attitude problems often present in human orchestras makes working at my computer that much more enjoyable! ;-) Heh, heh! Have you read F

Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO

2005-07-14 Thread dhbailey
Lee Actor wrote: Thanks, this is very helpful. It's hard to tell what's missing just from the list of patch names, e.g., "Viola Section" is included with Finale, but "Viola Section (10 players)" is only in the full GPO. Also, no Violin II section in either? [snip] Oh, no! No violin II sect

Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO

2005-07-14 Thread dhbailey
Johannes Gebauer wrote: Tyler Turner schrieb: Sections strings are solid, but I'm not sure about how well the solo strings can stand on their own or in small ensembles (string quartets, etc.). Not to take anyone's illusions away, but I have just been trying to make the full GPO imitate a

Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO

2005-07-14 Thread dhbailey
ronan wrote: [snip]> I understand that will not be able to use the full GPO with Finale2006 immediately. But Gary has promised a free patch will be out soon. [snip] That's interesting, especially in light of the fact that they are offering extra-cost addon GPO versions for Finale users to bu

Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO

2005-07-14 Thread dhbailey
Tyler Turner wrote: [snip]> For most of the instruments, you get a single solo instrument and 3 ensemble instruments. Thanks for adding that -- after reading Ronald's post I was feeling a bit let-down. I am intrigued now! -- David H. Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] _

Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO

2005-07-14 Thread dhbailey
Tyler Turner wrote: [snip]> I'm discovering that scores which have a lot of markings for HP to interpret can sound better than a lot of the scores I hear on the GPO demo page - and that's using the Finale GPO set that comes with Finale. Do you HAVE to use HP? Nope. It's all MIDI data that Finale

Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO

2005-07-14 Thread Matthew Hindson Fastmail Account
Johannes Gebauer wrote: Not to take anyone's illusions away, but I have just been trying to make the full GPO imitate a string quartet. To be honest, the only instrument that is sort of acceptable is the cello, in some registers at least. None of the violins sound remotely like solo violins to

RE: [Finale] 2006/GPO

2005-07-13 Thread Lee Actor
> Tyler Turner schrieb: > > Sections > > strings are solid, but I'm not sure about how well the > > solo strings can stand on their own or in small > > ensembles (string quartets, etc.). > > Not to take anyone's illusions away, but I have just been trying to make > the full GPO imitate a string qua

RE: [Finale] 2006/GPO

2005-07-13 Thread Lee Actor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf > Of Tyler Turner > Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 2:17 PM > To: finale@shsu.edu > Subject: Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO > > > > > --- Lee Actor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Can anyone who is currently using

Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO

2005-07-13 Thread Johannes Gebauer
Tyler Turner schrieb: Sections strings are solid, but I'm not sure about how well the solo strings can stand on their own or in small ensembles (string quartets, etc.). Not to take anyone's illusions away, but I have just been trying to make the full GPO imitate a string quartet. To be honest

RE: [Finale] 2006/GPO

2005-07-13 Thread Tyler Turner
--- ronan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Lee, > > I am currently using the full GPO with Finale > 2004--and I can't wait for > Finale 2006. As I understand it, about 100 GPO > instruments are included with > F2006--and that means, to me, that they can be > loaded directly from Finale. > It see

RE: [Finale] 2006/GPO

2005-07-13 Thread ronan
List Subject: [Finale] 2006/GPO Can anyone who is currently using GPO with Finale 2005 tell me how useful from a practical standpoint the subset of GPO that is shipping with Finale 2006 is compared to the full version? In other words, how much do you depend on the patches not included with the pa

Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO

2005-07-13 Thread Tyler Turner
--- Lee Actor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can anyone who is currently using GPO with Finale > 2005 tell me how useful > from a practical standpoint the subset of GPO that > is shipping with Finale > 2006 is compared to the full version? In other > words, how much do you > depend on the patches

[Finale] 2006/GPO

2005-07-13 Thread Lee Actor
Can anyone who is currently using GPO with Finale 2005 tell me how useful from a practical standpoint the subset of GPO that is shipping with Finale 2006 is compared to the full version? In other words, how much do you depend on the patches not included with the partial version for decent results?