On 23.09.2007 David W. Fenton wrote:
but
here are some examples that work in Acrobat on Mac but not in
Preview:
I only tried the first example, but it displays fine in Preview. In fact
it looks 1000 times more beautiful in Preview than it does in Reader 8
on Mac. The Reader 8 rendition
On 23.09.2007 Kurt Gnos wrote:
I am on Windows XP using acrobat pro 7 and I have no PDF problems
whatsoever. You can't blame the PDF output - the problem seems to be the
Preview program on Mac.
No, now we really are getting confused here. The screen display of
Windows produced Finale PDFs is
On 23.09.2007 Kurt Gnos wrote:
I have no problems with Finale and PDF on Windows. I use Acrobat pro 7 and
sometimes do 30 PDFs a day. They are crisp and clean. Don't blame Finale -
check your program and settings.
You mean in printout or on screen? I don't think there ever was a
problem in
On 23.09.2007 David W. Fenton wrote:
Another thing that strikes immediately is the difference in quality between
in the PDFs on screen between Finale and Sibelius.
You know, I look at those two examples and all I see is Finale files
produced using default settings, as opposed to created with
Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote:
Does anybody have an answer to this? I'm still drawing a blank...
Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote, on 9/17/2007 9:59 PM:
This must be easy. A colleague also uses Finale Speedy entry, but with
a Midi keyboard. I don't, so can't answer this. It sounds familiar,
but
John Howell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I saved the site below last time this question came up. Be aware
that in the U.S. there are two
different sets of weight names. 28-lb Bond, according to this
chart, equals 70-lb Offset.
http://www.paper-paper.com/weight.html
Thanks for the URL. It
I've never run into it, but my best guess is that some background
process is taking over the CPU for short periods of time.
Okay, then this isn't some sort of keyboard shortcut that's accidentally
being turned on? I vaguely remembered a key combo that would keep the
cursor in place to enter
Kurt Gnos wrote:
[snip]
I wish our list could be strong enough to DEMAND this.
[snip]
The demands/requests are there -- what is needed is for MakeMusic to
respond in a manner which shows that they care about their installed
customer base, instead of using Finale-generated income to support
Dick Hauser / 07.9.22 / 0:32 PM wrote:
Yes. I've loaded a midi file into quicktime and it plays just fine.
Exported that to the desktop as midi and then dragged to DP5 which
played without a problem (after changing output for midi to my Emu
and DMP.
Seems you can isolate the problem to
Ok, the stafflines are displaying better in low resolution. Since I need
PDFs for printing, I don't mind much. And when I want to look a PDFs, I use
high resolution (1920x1200), and that's fine - say, compared with the
quality of tons of scanned PDFs I have...
But here is a simple solution. If
On 23.09.2007 Kurt Gnos wrote:
But here is a simple solution. If the staff lines are troubling you - just
go to document options - Lines and curves - and set the line thickness of
staff lines to a lower value - I used 0.003 in my sample PDF that you can
get from:
Is there a way to have a page graphic only display in one part?
Johannes
--
http://www.musikmanufaktur.com
http://www.camerata-berolinensis.de
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
On 23.09.2007 Johannes Gebauer wrote:
Is there a way to have a page graphic only display in one part?
I realized I can use a measure graphic in this case.
Johannes
--
http://www.musikmanufaktur.com
http://www.camerata-berolinensis.de
___
Finale
On Sep 23, 2007, at 4:41 AM, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
On 23.09.2007 Kurt Gnos wrote:
I am on Windows XP using acrobat pro 7 and I have no PDF problems
whatsoever. You can't blame the PDF output - the problem seems to
be the
Preview program on Mac.
No, now we really are getting confused
On Sep 23, 2007, at 6:47 AM, Ken Moore wrote:
John Howell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.paper-paper.com/weight.html
Thanks for the URL. It makes me realise how (relatively) simple
life is in the metric world, where if I am in any doubt as to
whether I am using 80 gm or 100 gm
On Sep 23, 2007, at 8:11 AM, dc wrote:
dhbailey écrit:
My bet would be that there is a larger flow from Finale to
Sibelius than the other way around.
Of course! MM is doing its best to send its users to Sibelius...
I know many people who have made the switch from F to S, and none
who
Christopher Smith wrote:
On Sep 23, 2007, at 4:41 AM, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
On 23.09.2007 Kurt Gnos wrote:
I am on Windows XP using acrobat pro 7 and I have no PDF problems
whatsoever. You can't blame the PDF output - the problem seems to be the
Preview program on Mac.
No, now we really
If any mac owners have the time to test.
In working on my problem of F2k8 crash on open, I've noticed that the
Audio Midi Setup pane of OS is set to 2-ch 24-bit. The MM tech
mentioned that Finale only wants 16 bit, but since the crash seems to
happen when Finale is initializing midi (not
At 8:03 AM -0400 9/23/07, dhbailey wrote:
It would be very interesting to see the amount of cross-grade sales
of Sibelius for Finale-users and compare that with cross-grade sales
of Finale for Sibelius users.
My bet would be that there is a larger flow from Finale to Sibelius
than the
On Sep 23, 2007, at 1:20 PM, dhbailey wrote:
Christopher Smith wrote:
On Sep 23, 2007, at 4:41 AM, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
On 23.09.2007 Kurt Gnos wrote:
I am on Windows XP using acrobat pro 7 and I have no PDF problems
whatsoever. You can't blame the PDF output - the problem seems
to be
Since PDFs are basically postscript, and Finale's display, I guess, is also
a kind of postscript, this should be solved easily. Finale's superior fine
tuning possibilities (like the possibility to adjust the thickness of staff
lines) has its ups, on the other hand drawing the lines as hairlines
Since PDFs are basically postscript, and Finale's display, I guess, is
also
a kind of postscript, this should be solved easily.
This does not address the fact that Finale's Compile Postscript Listing
function produces a perfect display. Finale prints to Postscript and
compiles Postscript quite
PS to previous: The reason this is very important for me is that Compile
Postscript Listing does *not* include embedded graphics. For many scores, I
need them, and have had to fall back on printing to Postscript and its
poor results.
Dennis
___
On 23.09.2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The example you posted looks like the quality display produced by Compile
Postscript Listing rather than print-to-Postscript. What was your
printing sequence from Finale? And what printer driver were you printing
to?
No, he just used very thin lines. If
On 23.09.2007 Christopher Smith wrote:
Not on my system. Preview makes all the line grey onscreen, but only from SOME
Windows-produced PDFs (Mac ones look fine), but Reader 8 looks great.
But the lines should be grey. They are thinner than one pixel, so the
anti-aliasing should make it
Johannes wrote:
No, he just used very thin lines. If you print this example it will look
pretty awful, at least to my eyes. If you look at the example at high
magnification you will still see that the lines don't anti-alias, and
display slightly different thicknesses.
The lines are very thin,
I just used the Acrobat 7 printer driver. No compile postscript - You see
why I'm quite happy with Finale's PDF output now...;-) BUT I adjusted the
staff line width in Finale.
In fact, I have wonderful output from any program whatsoever. In Quark
Xpress, you can also save as postscript - I get
Dennis,
I used to use EPS a lot, and since Finale couldn't get them working for a
decade or so, I switched to Tiffs. Pity, since I like EPS and the
possibility to enlarge or shrink the EPS at will without losing quality. I
never had any problems with PDFs, though, and sometimes I use them as a
On 23 Sep 2007 at 10:38, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
On 23.09.2007 David W. Fenton wrote:
but
here are some examples that work in Acrobat on Mac but not in
Preview:
I only tried the first example, but it displays fine in Preview. In fact
it looks 1000 times more beautiful in Preview
Dennis,
you can send me a Finale File using embedded Graphics, and I will print it
using Acrobat 7 Pro in XP and upload the output.
Kurt
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im
Auftrag von [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 23. September 2007
On 23 Sep 2007 at 11:10, dc wrote:
Kim Patrick Clow écrit:
I posted 3 new files...
GWV529-Finale.pdf
is a PDF of the Finale file.
GWV529-Sibelius.pdf
is a PDF of the Sibelius first reading of the XML generated by Finale.
GWV529-Sibelius-cleaned-up.pdf
is a PDF of the file after it
On 23 Sep 2007 at 11:07, dc wrote:
David W. Fenton écrit:
You know, I look at those two examples and all I see is Finale files
produced using default settings, as opposed to created with the kinds
of bautiful layout and settings that you, for instance, produce in
your editions. PDF quality
you can send me a Finale File using embedded Graphics, and I will print it
using Acrobat 7 Pro in XP and upload the output.
Kurt,
Most of my files are 20-100MB with their embedded graphics -- a tad too
large to send. But I am trying another set of new drivers, and other than
the staff lines,
On 23 Sep 2007 at 11:20, dc wrote:
We've already discussed this several
times (with each new version of Finale), and the problem arises from the
fact that where the lines in Sibelius PDFs (and perhaps MacFin PDFs) are
real lines of the proper thickness, Finale lines are made of several thin
On 23 Sep 2007 at 21:37, Kurt Gnos wrote:
Since PDFs are basically postscript, and Finale's display, I guess, is
also a kind of postscript,
Huh? How does Finale on Windows utilize PS onscreen? The fact is, it
doesn't.
For that matter, on Mac, display PS *is* used for rendering, but at
the
When I see 50 such posts in my inbox, I assume somebody is circulating
pictures of cute kittens in a basket. Is it actually:
Answer Wanted (a strong candidate)
Award-Winning (for the particularly egotistical)
Asshole Whining (insert your own joke)
Articulations Went away (not-so-funny joke)
On 23 Sep 2007 at 15:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since PDFs are basically postscript, and Finale's display, I guess, is
also
a kind of postscript, this should be solved easily.
This does not address the fact that Finale's Compile Postscript Listing
function produces a perfect display.
On 23 Sep 2007 at 10:33, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
On 23.09.2007 David W. Fenton wrote:
Another thing that strikes immediately is the difference in quality
between
in the PDFs on screen between Finale and Sibelius.
You know, I look at those two examples and all I see is Finale files
On 23 Sep 2007 at 22:02, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
The problem with the windows PDF output displayed in Reader is that all
the lines are different thickness, extremely thick, and the notes are so
blotchy one can't read them.
Well, that's a horse of a different color.
On every PC I've ever
AW is the German abbreviation for ANSWER.
When I see 50 such posts in my inbox, I assume somebody is circulating
pictures of cute kittens in a basket. Is it actually:
Answer Wanted (a strong candidate)
Award-Winning (for the particularly egotistical)
Asshole Whining (insert your own joke)
It could mean antwoord in Dutch (answer). I haven't seen any cute
kittens, except for my red Freekje (= little Frederick, in Dutch) lying
in front of me on the desk. Going to bed now!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I see 50 such posts in my inbox, I assume somebody is circulating
pictures of
On 23 Sep 2007 at 22:09, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
On 23.09.2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The example you posted looks like the quality display produced by
Compile Postscript Listing rather than print-to-Postscript. What was
your printing sequence from Finale? And what printer driver were
On Sep 23, 2007, at 4:02 PM, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
On 23.09.2007 Christopher Smith wrote:
Not on my system. Preview makes all the line grey onscreen, but
only from SOME Windows-produced PDFs (Mac ones look fine), but
Reader 8 looks great.
But the lines should be grey. They are thinner
Dick Hauser / 07.9.23 / 1:44 PM wrote:
In working on my problem of F2k8 crash on open, I've noticed that the
Audio Midi Setup pane of OS is set to 2-ch 24-bit. The MM tech
mentioned that Finale only wants 16 bit, but since the crash seems to
happen when Finale is initializing midi (not
Dennis,
Try
yousendit.com
for large files. They allow files to be sent up to 100mb when you
register. I find it very useful.
Christopher
On Sep 23, 2007, at 5:25 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you can send me a Finale File using embedded Graphics, and I will
print it
using Acrobat 7
Hello you people out there,
Does anyone know what Coda has done to alternate transposition thingy being
found in the
STAFF-ATTRIBUTE/EDIT box?
I add a String bass to my score which should sound 8vb but the East West
Colossus Sampler cannot play it being that it is out of range. Same
procedure
On Sep 23, 2007, at 6:28 PM, Andrew Noah Cap wrote:
Hello you people out there,
Does anyone know what Coda has done to alternate transposition
thingy being
found in the
STAFF-ATTRIBUTE/EDIT box?
I add a String bass to my score which should sound 8vb but the East
West
Colossus Sampler
47 matches
Mail list logo