Re: [Finale] EPS Issues (was: Including a graphic score in Finale)

2005-05-27 Thread Johannes Gebauer

David W. Fenton schrieb:
Now, I do think that the argument that PDF is now native to OS X is a 
persuasive one in terms of arguing what Finale should support on OS 
X. However, there is no such native support in Windows, nor do I know 
if the next major release of Windows, Longhorn, will incorporate PDF 
support. Given that MS is trying to create a competing standard, 
Metro (see 
http://www.computerworld.com/softwaretopics/software/story/0,10801,101

344,00.html, all on one line, of course), I strongly doubt it.

Thus, MakeMusic would be required to support two completely different 
formats on the two different versions of Finale. That goes against 
the recent history of the design of Finale, which has been as far as 
possible identical in functionality on both Windows and Mac (though 
the UI may have slight variations appropriate to the platform).


Finale always supported two different native graphics formats, TIFF and 
PICT. Eventually TIFF was included on the Mac platform as well, as the 
Mac uses that, too. But as far as I know Pict is only supported on the 
Mac platform.


PDF will be the future for any graphics based app on the Mac, and I am 
pretty sure that Finale will eventually have to include PDF export. It's 
probably not even a big deal, as most of it would be handled by the OS 
anyway. Perhaps in 2k8.


Johannes
--
http://www.musikmanufaktur.com
http://www.camerata-berolinensis.de

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] EPS Issues (was: Including a graphic score in Finale)

2005-05-26 Thread Christopher Smith


On May 26, 2005, at 10:14 AM, Robert Patterson wrote:

One the main uses I have had recently for EPS is taking small musical 
examples into a text article in Word. I did it in MacFin03, and it 
worked extremely well. It is difficult for me to see how PDF would 
have been any where near as convenient. The main difference is being 
able to select an arbitrary rectangle for exporting to EPS. I don't 
recall any way to do this with PDF.




As Darcy pointed out to me recently (to my surprise!) you can crop a 
one-page PDF in pre-Tiger OSX Preview to any size you like. Multi-page 
PDFs need Tiger's Preview.


But Word (nor AppleWorks) isn't PDF savvy, so it only imports a low-res 
preview that prints with jaggies. You need Pages or some other more 
modern layout program to import PDF's properly.


Christopher


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] EPS Issues (was: Including a graphic score in Finale)

2005-05-26 Thread Robert Patterson
Okay, that's an improvement. But it still isn't as convenient as the Graphics 
Tool. (That is, it is an extra step.)

 -Original Message-
 From: Christopher Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 As Darcy pointed out to me recently (to my surprise!) you can crop a 
 one-page PDF in pre-Tiger OSX Preview to any size you like.


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] EPS Issues (was: Including a graphic score in Finale)

2005-05-26 Thread Darcy James Argue

Hi Robert,

I agree, it's an extra step, but since PDF export is very fast and 
(mostly) reliable, whereas EPS export is very slow and buggy, it's 
probably a *faster* extra step, and unlike EPS in FinMacOSX, PDF's are 
WYSIWYG.


Of course, if you're importing into Word, the question is moot, because 
Word rasterizes imported PDFs.  But if you're importing into Quark or 
InDesign or whatever, I don't really see the point of using EPS -- 
especially if you want to actually see the graphics you're placing.


- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brooklyn, NY


On 26 May 2005, at 10:43 AM, Robert Patterson wrote:

Okay, that's an improvement. But it still isn't as convenient as the 
Graphics Tool. (That is, it is an extra step.)



-Original Message-
From: Christopher Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

As Darcy pointed out to me recently (to my surprise!) you can crop a
one-page PDF in pre-Tiger OSX Preview to any size you like.



___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale



___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] EPS Issues (was: Including a graphic score in Finale)

2005-05-26 Thread Johannes Gebauer

Well, for me this extra step is a killer.

Ideally FinMac should get PDF export capabilities in the graphics tool, 
since PDF is the standard on MacOSX.


Johannes

Darcy James Argue schrieb:

Hi Robert,

I agree, it's an extra step, but since PDF export is very fast and 
(mostly) reliable, whereas EPS export is very slow and buggy, it's 
probably a *faster* extra step, and unlike EPS in FinMacOSX, PDF's are 
WYSIWYG.


Of course, if you're importing into Word, the question is moot, because 
Word rasterizes imported PDFs.  But if you're importing into Quark or 
InDesign or whatever, I don't really see the point of using EPS -- 
especially if you want to actually see the graphics you're placing.


- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brooklyn, NY


On 26 May 2005, at 10:43 AM, Robert Patterson wrote:

Okay, that's an improvement. But it still isn't as convenient as the 
Graphics Tool. (That is, it is an extra step.)



-Original Message-
From: Christopher Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

As Darcy pointed out to me recently (to my surprise!) you can crop a
one-page PDF in pre-Tiger OSX Preview to any size you like.




___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale



___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale



--
http://www.musikmanufaktur.com
http://www.camerata-berolinensis.de
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] EPS Issues (was: Including a graphic score in Finale)

2005-05-26 Thread Brad Beyenhof
On Wed, 25 May 2005 14:40:35 -0500, Paul Hayden wrote:

 1. I'm still using FinMac 2004c (under OS X 10.3.5), but
 I've read that FinMac 2005 also gives you that font warning
 on _every_ single page you try to export as an EPS file. I'm
 so frustrated with this that I'm booting in OS 9 and using
 FinMac 2002 to do EPS exporting.

I've developed a (somewhat kludgy) workaround for this that uses
FinaleScript and QuicKeys in tandem. It will even batch-process a
folder of files into EPS, but it requires a bit of user intervention.

First, I use the following FinaleScript (idea compliments of Karen
Guthery, with a few modifications by yours truly):

//FinaleScript EPS Batch Export
batch process folder
graphics tool
execute menu item Export Pages...
save
close
//End Script

After you set the desired folder, this will automatically hit Export
Pages on every file in turn. On the first Export Pages dialog you
will have to select EPS in the top drop-down and then start the
QuicKeys macro.

The QuicKeys macro asks how many files there are that it needs to
process (so you need to have counted them in advance), and then it
automatically clicks All and Generate Names From: on the first
Export dialog. Then you also need to know how many pages are in each
file, as it will use this number to know how many times to click
Done in the Font Warning dialog.

The upshot of all this is that, with minimal (albeit relatively
constant, but if you're doing other work in the same room as the
computer this is a minor inconvenience) user input and a bit of
forethought, you can create EPS out of a folder of files in FinMac2k5.
I have done this to great effect with a concert band score recently,
and I think any bugs in the process have been sufficiently worked out.

-- 
Brad Beyenhof
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
my blog: http://augmentedfourth.blogspot.com
Life would be so much easier if only (3/2)^12=(2/1)^7.

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] EPS Issues (was: Including a graphic score in Finale)

2005-05-26 Thread Eric Dussault
Maybe there is something I don't get. I work with Pagemaker (it would  
be the same with InDesign) for the book layout. I use a default  
document that has all the pages (eps) placed, so when I export eps  
from Finale to Pagemaker, it links the eps automatically, and every  
time I make corrections to the score I export the eps and open  
pagemaker to update the links. The eps are embedded in the document,  
so I can trash the eps as soon as they are linked.


Now I don't see where having printed as pdf can help me, as I don't  
know how to relink automatically the pdf when it has been changed.


Éric Dussault

Le 05-05-26 à 11:50, Darcy James Argue a écrit :


Hi Robert,

I agree, it's an extra step, but since PDF export is very fast and  
(mostly) reliable, whereas EPS export is very slow and buggy, it's  
probably a *faster* extra step, and unlike EPS in FinMacOSX, PDF's  
are WYSIWYG.


Of course, if you're importing into Word, the question is moot,  
because Word rasterizes imported PDFs.  But if you're importing  
into Quark or InDesign or whatever, I don't really see the point of  
using EPS -- especially if you want to actually see the graphics  
you're placing.



___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] EPS Issues (was: Including a graphic score in Finale)

2005-05-26 Thread Darcy James Argue
I'm not sure I'm following you, Eric.  I'm not familiar with PageMaker, 
but any publishing app ought to be agnostic about file types.  If it 
can embed EPS, it should be able to embed other graphic types, 
including PDF -- right?


Have you tried importing PDFs into PageMaker?  If so, how does its 
behavior differ as compared to importing EPS files?


- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brooklyn, NY

On 26 May 2005, at 5:21 PM, Eric Dussault wrote:

Maybe there is something I don't get. I work with Pagemaker (it would 
be the same with InDesign) for the book layout. I use a default 
document that has all the pages (eps) placed, so when I export eps 
from Finale to Pagemaker, it links the eps automatically, and every 
time I make corrections to the score I export the eps and open 
pagemaker to update the links. The eps are embedded in the document, 
so I can trash the eps as soon as they are linked.


Now I don't see where having printed as pdf can help me, as I don't 
know how to relink automatically the pdf when it has been changed.


Éric Dussault

Le 05-05-26 à 11:50, Darcy James Argue a écrit :


Hi Robert,

I agree, it's an extra step, but since PDF export is very fast and 
(mostly) reliable, whereas EPS export is very slow and buggy, it's 
probably a *faster* extra step, and unlike EPS in FinMacOSX, PDF's 
are WYSIWYG.


Of course, if you're importing into Word, the question is moot, 
because Word rasterizes imported PDFs.  But if you're importing into 
Quark or InDesign or whatever, I don't really see the point of using 
EPS -- especially if you want to actually see the graphics you're 
placing.



___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale




___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] EPS Issues (was: Including a graphic score in Finale)

2005-05-26 Thread David W. Fenton
On 26 May 2005 at 18:57, Darcy James Argue wrote:

 I'm not sure I'm following you, Eric.  I'm not familiar with
 PageMaker, but any publishing app ought to be agnostic about file
 types.  If it can embed EPS, it should be able to embed other graphic
 types, including PDF -- right?

I don't find your logic persuasive.

EPS and PDF are definitely a different kind of graphics format than 
TIFF, JPEG, GIF, PNG, PICT and so forth. Both are wrappers around 
PostScript output, and PS is a *page* description language, not a 
graphics format. Yes, it's been adapted to devices other than 
printers (the ones that produce pages), with the advent of Display 
PostScript, but it's still a very, very different type of graphics 
format.

And PDF, since it has a wrapper around it designed to make it a 
standalone file format (as opposed to EPS, which by defintion does 
not need to be standalone, as it's entirely designed for *embedding* 
in other documents, hence the name, of of course). Put another way, 
one is a document encapsulating PS, the other a graphic format 
encapsulating PS.

Now, I do think that the argument that PDF is now native to OS X is a 
persuasive one in terms of arguing what Finale should support on OS 
X. However, there is no such native support in Windows, nor do I know 
if the next major release of Windows, Longhorn, will incorporate PDF 
support. Given that MS is trying to create a competing standard, 
Metro (see 
http://www.computerworld.com/softwaretopics/software/story/0,10801,101
344,00.html, all on one line, of course), I strongly doubt it.

Thus, MakeMusic would be required to support two completely different 
formats on the two different versions of Finale. That goes against 
the recent history of the design of Finale, which has been as far as 
possible identical in functionality on both Windows and Mac (though 
the UI may have slight variations appropriate to the platform).

But Metro does not appear to me to really be the same thing as PDF, 
as it is just a document format that can be rendered by browsers (XML 
with style sheets), rather than a wrapper around a page description 
language. This would make it considerably less suitable for 
embedding, I would think. Of course, MS is describing it as a page 
description language, but that looks like typical Microsoft FUD to 
me. On the other hand, it's pretty good FUD, since it does hit all 
the buzzwords necessary to replicate the functionality of PostScript 
as seen in OS X, and is said to be wrapped up with MS's Avalon 
technology (which is display technology, a response to Quartz and 
Display PostScript, if I'm reading it right).

I hate Microsoft.

On the other hand, I also hate Adobe Acrobat Reader. It has always 
been a steaming pile with a piss-poor user interface that really 
isn't very well designed for the task it is supposed to perform. 
Maybe a little competition would improve it, but I just don't see 
much utility in multiplying document formats like this.

But I digress.

It is relevant to the future of Finale, though, assuming MakeMusic is 
still producing Finale for Windows after the release of Longhorn. And 
it doesn't bode well for the possibility of cross-platform PDF 
embedding.

-- 
David W. Fentonhttp://www.bway.net/~dfenton
David Fenton Associateshttp://www.bway.net/~dfassoc

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] EPS Issues (was: Including a graphic score in Finale)

2005-05-26 Thread Eric Dussault
The difference is that eps in Finale are single page files, and pdf  
are multi-pages files. Multi-pages are less flexible and more  
complicated to handle. It seems to be possible in pagemaker to work  
with mult-pages files but it needs a lot more work than just placing  
a generic eps link.
Darcy, could you be more specific about how you handle multi-pages  
pdf into a DTP program. For me the goal is not placing the file, but  
create a workflow that is fast and reliable and so far I am not  
convinced that pdf are better than eps for what I do, but I could  
change my mind.
Right now the way I work is that I export my eps always with the same  
number sequence (001, 002 etc.). The Pagemaker model I use already  
has the links for, let say, pages 1 to 99. When I export eps after  
that there is nothing more to do than open the pagemaker file (it  
automatically update the links) and create Title page, text and so  
on, and create a booklet for printing. I have seen so far nothing as  
easy and fast as that, but I am curious to learn other ways.


Le 05-05-26 à 18:57, Darcy James Argue a écrit :

I'm not sure I'm following you, Eric.  I'm not familiar with  
PageMaker, but any publishing app ought to be agnostic about file  
types.  If it can embed EPS, it should be able to embed other  
graphic types, including PDF -- right?


Have you tried importing PDFs into PageMaker?  If so, how does its  
behavior differ as compared to importing EPS files?



___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] EPS Issues (was: Including a graphic score in Finale)

2005-05-26 Thread Darcy James Argue

On 26 May 2005, at 8:26 PM, Eric Dussault wrote:

The difference is that eps in Finale are single page files, and pdf 
are multi-pages files.


Eric, PDFs can be as many or as few pages as you want.  It's just as 
easy to create a single-page PDF as it is to create a single-page EPS.  
(Easier, actually, because you don't have to deal with the font 
warnings and excessively long processing time.)


If you want to export only a portion of a Finale page, it is admittedly 
slightly easier to use the graphics tool to create an EPS than it is to 
export a single-page PDF and crop it in Preview.  But EPS's created 
from Finale in OS X don't display correctly on screen, whereas PDFs do. 
 And PDFs created in OS X embed all necessary fonts, whereas 
Finale-created EPS's don't embed any fonts.


Right now the way I work is that I export my eps always with the same 
number sequence (001, 002 etc.). The Pagemaker model I use already has 
the links for, let say, pages 1 to 99. When I export eps after that 
there is nothing more to do than open the pagemaker file (it 
automatically update the links) and create Title page, text and so on, 
and create a booklet for printing. I have seen so far nothing as easy 
and fast as that, but I am curious to learn other ways.


Eric, like I said, I'm not familiar with PageMaker so I can't say what 
will work and what won't.  Have you tried doing exactly the same thing 
with single-page PDFs?


I was thinking of the more usual (for me, at least) use for EPS, which 
is to place musical examples in a text document.  Given all the 
problems with EPS export in OS X -- not to mention the complete 
inability to use EPS export in Windows -- PDFs seem like a far superior 
solution, since they are (A) easy to create, (B) display correctly on 
screen, and (C) are portable, even to computers using a different font 
set.


(Of course, all of this presumes that you are placing the PDFs into an 
application that handles PDFs correctly, i.e., not Word or AppleWorks.)


- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brooklyn, NY

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] EPS Issues (was: Including a graphic score in Finale)

2005-05-25 Thread John Roberts
There are some things that don't work in Mac OSX.

I have found that if I am using a font with more than 2 weights, only the
regular and the next weight up, which might be semibold are
incorporated, and the heavier weights seem to be inaccessible. I don't know
how OSX font management works (I'm an OS9 Type 1 Font kind of guy), so I
don't know if this is a Finale problem or an OSX problem. But other programs
seem to handle these fonts OK (eg Adobe Stempel Schneidler, with Regular,
Medium, Bold and Heavy).

My regular modus operandi is to export eps from Finale into PageMaker to
create books - I am mostly still using Finale 2003. (Except for guitar
tablature, where I still use 2001 because the new way of making tablature
still has serious problems, but that's another story).

John Roberts




On 5/25/05 12:55 PM, Darcy James Argue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi Robert,
 
 There are two main issues:
 
 1) EPS export doesn't work in WinFin.  This is a longstanding problem.
 
 2) EPS export works in Mac OS X, but the onscreen graphic preview is
 very low quality compared to OS 9.  The print quality, however, is
 fine.
 
 - Darcy
 -
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Brooklyn, NY
 
 
 On 25 May 2005, at 11:21 AM, Robert Patterson wrote:
 
 Can someone explain to me the issues with EPS? I have seen several
 posts over recent months about EPS being broken but I didn't quite
 understand them.
 
 Is the problem that EPS files cannot be re-imported back into Finale
 with the Graphic tool? Is the problem with all EPS's or just EPS's
 created with Finale? Is the problem limited to one or the other OS
 Platform? And wasn't it fairly recently introduced (c. Fin04)?
 
 
 
 
 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
 
 
 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] EPS Issues (was: Including a graphic score in Finale)

2005-05-25 Thread Paul Hayden

Darcy James Argue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


2) EPS export works in Mac OS X, but the onscreen graphic preview is
very low quality compared to OS 9.  The print quality, however, is
fine.


Other possible problems with EPS export on a Mac:

1. I'm still using FinMac 2004c (under OS X 10.3.5), but I've read 
that FinMac 2005 also gives you that font warning on _every_ single 
page you try to export as an EPS file. I'm so frustrated with this 
that I'm booting in OS 9 and using FinMac 2002 to do EPS exporting.


2. Maybe it's my ancient 'puter (PowerMac G4, 500 MHz), but EPS 
export is very, very slow using FinMac 2004c. It's fast, however, 
with FinMac 2002 under OS 9.2.2.


Not directly related to EPS export, but FinMac 2002 under OS 9 is 
quite zippy, while FinMac 2004c under OS X is rather sluggish. 
Nothing that a few thousand dollars can't fix.

:-\

Paul Hayden

--
Magnolia Music Press  http://www.paulhayden.com
6319 Riverbend Blvd. 
Baton Rouge, LA  70820

Fax (by arrangement)  Voice: 225-769-9604
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale