Hi,
Submitted an updated libnet package (1.1.1 which was released last week)
to the fink sourceforge - because your mail address is no more correct in
the package info file.
The update got rejected with the following message :
The maintainer had to change email. Contact fink-devel ATTENTION
him
Am Dienstag, 02.12.03 um 10:12 Uhr schrieb Mathieu Masseboeuf -
NewSports:
[...]
The strange thing is that I sent an update for Bison, which got
accepted
despite the maintainer being unreachable ...
The maintainer of bison (me) is unreachable? Interesting :-)
Max
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
TheSin wrote:
an other major problem you might encounter is if it's a nightly tar file
the MD5sum will change nightly.
I am not that daring ;)
It is development but it still has scheduled releases.
- -d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Max Horn wrote:
Am Dienstag, 02.12.03 um 10:12 Uhr schrieb Mathieu Masseboeuf - NewSports:
[...]
The strange thing is that I sent an update for Bison, which got accepted
despite the maintainer being unreachable ...
The maintainer of bison (me)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Max Horn wrote:
Am Montag, 01.12.03 um 11:31 Uhr schrieb D. Höhn:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Hello all
I know we have an excellent and working gnupg package. Yet, as I am a
frequent user and thus sometimes test GPG or use
sounds allot like testing to me or how about gnupg-unstable ?
---
TS
http://southofheaven.org
Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest.
On 1-Dec-03, at 3:27 PM, Darian Lanx wrote:
Because it is neither really testing nor is it alpha code. It is a
development branch we does run
Would it be possible to post use statistics and/or
let people vote on what their favorite packages are?
Joe
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
help you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Joe Corneli wrote:
Would it be possible to post use statistics and/or
let people vote on what their favorite packages are?
Joe
try
'fink desc popularity-contest'
- -d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin)
Am Montag, 01.12.03 um 23:27 Uhr schrieb Darian Lanx:
[...]
IMHO that name would easily lead to confusion. Why not gnupg-alpha
or gnupg-testing etc.?
Because it is neither really testing nor is it alpha code. It is a
development branch we does run reliably stable, it is just not meant
for
Hi Dave,
I just updated the tetex-base package. That worked well. However, I
noticed that in this process a new (virgin) ls-R was installed in
/sw/etc/texmf.local. Therefore I needed to run mktexlsr to regain
access to the installed packages in texmf.local. Could this be added to
the
Am Montag, 01.12.03 um 23:27 Uhr schrieb Darian Lanx:
[...]
IMHO that name would easily lead to confusion. Why not gnupg-alpha
or gnupg-testing etc.?
Because it is neither really testing nor is it alpha code. It is a
development branch we does run reliably stable, it is just not meant
for
Hi,
NEdit still hasn't been added to the 10.3 tree because there were
problems building it. Today I ran into this on the blog of Ben Reed (of
all places :), and the solution seems to work!
here's the link: http://ranger.befunk.com/blog/archives/000246.html,
and look for the reply by merle.
Am Dienstag, 02.12.03 um 23:45 Uhr schrieb TheSin:
up until recently BuildDependsOnly was an accepted field but it didn't
do anything. Dave has added a warning if a pkgs depends on a
BuildDependsOnly pkg now. And I just added to fink cvs two more
functions that now use BuildDependsOnly.
I thought some of you might be interested in the wrapper I've been
using for Fink lately. It requires Fink packages expect-pm and
debfoster-2.5 . Here's what the wrapper `bfink` does to modify the
build process:
bfink
Description: Binary data
rmorphans2
Description: Binary data
1.
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 03:45:54PM -0700, TheSin wrote:
Also on a side note I'm working on fink remove -d pkg which will remove
a pkg and all it's deps, this will need some what of a new dep engine,
and I'll be able to make a fink deptree pkg using the same engine, are
there any
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Dec 02, 2003, at 17:45, TheSin wrote:
Also on a side note I'm working on fink remove -d pkg which will
remove a pkg and all it's deps, this will need some what of a new dep
engine, and I'll be able to make a fink deptree pkg using the same
Hi Mathieu,
I changed my email a couple of weeks ago, and that was updated in all
of my fink packages... I also updated it on SourceForge, so I don't
know what's happening there...
I'll take a look at the updated package tonight.
Thanks!
On 02/12/2003, at 8:12 PM, Mathieu Masseboeuf -
yes to a degree but backwards, compile a list of pkgs that have build
only deps and search for depends on em, but only if your checking the
whole tree.
---
TS
http://southofheaven.org
Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest.
On 2-Dec-03, at 4:23 PM, Max Horn wrote:
How
I'm just gonna do it steps, first I need BuildConflicts, which I just
added, now I'm gonna add the transparent check before every build code,
it'll remove and install as needed but won't ask since the first
summary will cover it all anyhow. And I've got that part almost
working already, but I
I've already addressed this to a degree, see fink list -i -b and fink
remove|purge -b
---
TS
http://southofheaven.org
Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest.
On 2-Dec-03, at 4:29 PM, Dave Vasilevsky wrote:
Items two and three allow me to say 'bfink install xmms' and have fink
I'd love to start in this but I only know perl, and even that, well you
read Max's comment I'm sure he is trembling now that I decided to take
this on, I just hope that you can just convert my perl additions for
libfinch easily, that is the best I can do for help...sorry
---
TS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Justin F. Hallett wrote:
| + foreach $pname (sort @selected) {
| + $package = Fink::Package-package_by_name($pname);
| +
| + # Can't purge or remove virtuals
| + next if $package-is_virtual();
| +
| +
it's not dia isn't libunicode-gnome, I've already posted this to
fink-devel...
---
TS
http://southofheaven.org
Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest.
On 2-Dec-03, at 9:17 PM, Ben Hines wrote:
Update of /cvsroot/fink/experimental/benh57/finkinfo/test
In directory
hmm good find...see this is working already :) now if a fix was
committed with it :) jk I'll get it on my next commit, thanks pogma.
---
TS
http://southofheaven.org
Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest.
On 2-Dec-03, at 9:31 PM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED
On Dec 2, 2003, at 3:29 PM, Dave Vasilevsky wrote:
3. Calls the utility program rmorphans2 to remove all the packages
that were only installed as a [Build]Depend, but that I don't want
kept.
This would be a really nice feature to have implemented directly in
fink.
-Ben
That sentence makes no sense
-Ben
On Dec 2, 2003, at 8:45 PM, TheSin wrote:
it's not dia isn't libunicode-gnome, I've already posted this to
fink-devel...
---
TS
http://southofheaven.org
Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest.
On 2-Dec-03, at 9:17 PM, Ben Hines wrote:
it is good to work in CVS. But for major dep engine changes you might
want to work in a 'branch' instead, not HEAD.
-Ben
On Dec 2, 2003, at 7:22 PM, TheSin wrote:
I'm just gonna do it steps, first I need BuildConflicts, which I just
added, now I'm gonna add the transparent check before every
isn't = it's sorry
---
TS
http://southofheaven.org
Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest.
On 2-Dec-03, at 9:52 PM, Ben Hines wrote:
That sentence makes no sense
-Ben
On Dec 2, 2003, at 8:45 PM, TheSin wrote:
it's not dia isn't libunicode-gnome, I've already posted this to
28 matches
Mail list logo
