Le 23 janv. 2004, à 1:49, Pascal J.Bourguignon a écrit :
find . -name mbox -ls
66892600 -rw--- 1 pascal staff 0 Jan 23 01:45
./.mbox/mbox
66883790 -rw--- 1 pascal staff 0 Jan 14 10:36
./Deleted\ Messages.mbox/mbox
From the find manpage:
-ls
Hi all,
I'm thinking of creating a fink package for RubyCocoa
(http://rubycocoa.sourceforge.net), a cocoa wrapper package for ruby,
similar to what CamelBones does for Perl. It seems an appropriate
subject for packaging to me because it:
- Will depend on another fink package (ruby18) and no
Matthias Neeracher wrote:
- Do y'all agree that frameworks are, in principle, fink packageable
matter?
- Where should frameworks be installed? /sw/lib/Frameworks ?
/sw/lib/frameworks ? /sw/Frameworks? /sw/frameworks? /sw/lib/sw?
My vote goes for a new directory /sw/Library and
Michèle Garoche wrote:
Le 23 janv. 2004, à 1:49, Pascal J.Bourguignon a écrit :
find . -name mbox -ls
66892600 -rw--- 1 pascal staff 0 Jan 23 01:45
./.mbox/mbox
66883790 -rw--- 1 pascal staff 0 Jan 14 10:36
./Deleted\ Messages.mbox/mbox
From
Thank you to all the people who answered me about creating a .patch
file.
I would enjoy to help the community by porting some software; but now I
am still learning ;-)
The software I am trying to port is bsvc (a Motorola 68000 simulator
assembler).
I managed to patch and compile it and I
Hi,
When creating a splitoff package, am I limited to foo-dev, foo-shlibs,
and foo-bin? Or can I create other ones as well (in my case it would be
called foo-scripting). Or would it be better to just create a separate
package for that, that depends on foo?
thanks,
- Koen.
Unfortunately Solaris' mv is too brain dead such that it won't work
unless I use another mv.
Actually, more fiddling reveals that fink probably needs to be
rewritten to port to another platform at all (and I'm not going to
advocate this, at least not on fink's own mailing list :-] ). There is
Randal L. Schwartz writes:
some of them are not 0. I suspect the ones that are 0 really are 0.
Yes, the ones that are 0 in ls are really 0. But even the ones that
are not 0 in ls are 0 in find -ls, that's the problem.
(Of course, you are aware that these files are stored on a HFS+ file
Matthias Neeracher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
However, the package installs a framework, for which I think we don't
currently have a precedent. So my questions are:
- Do y'all agree that frameworks are, in principle, fink packageable
matter?
- Where should frameworks be installed?
Martin Costabel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we will have to restart the old discussion of /sw/Applications,
too. And I mean a real discussion, not the hasty erection of religious
taboos as we had in the past. I would really love to see things like
Tcl/Tk-aqua and rangerrick's
On Jan 25, 2004, at 4:59 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
OK, I suppose this is going to be controversial. Any discussion?
Fine by me, as long as we stick to open source applications ONLY. The
objection about 'moving apps around' never did make sense to me, i
think a more important objection
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 25 04:24:05 2004
From: Martin Costabel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.6)
Gecko/20040113
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Matthias Neeracher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
David R. Morrison wrote:
I agree with Martin: if we need to extend the FHS, we should do it in
parallel to the way Apple did it. So we should use /sw/Library/Frameworks
or /sw/System/Library/Frameworks, probably the former. (I don't understand
the distinction between /System/Library/Frameworks
On Jan 25, 2004, at 10:33 AM, Pierre Mazoyer wrote:
The software I am trying to port is bsvc (a Motorola 68000 simulator
assembler).
I managed to patch and compile it and I have also started to write
.info and .patch files.
Another question is about documentation.
Is DocFiles: sufficient to
Randal == Randal L Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Randal And it's a different number after .VERSION every time.
Ahh, the problem seemed to be that /sw/fink was owned by root,
not merlyn. Not sure how it got that way, but what an odd way
to tell me. :)
--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge
gnuplot history
warning: history command requires some form of readline support
fink list readline
Information about 2434 packages read in 2 seconds.
i readline 4.3-25 Comfortable terminal input library
i readline-shlibs4.3-25 Comfortable
Hi,
I'm the findutils maintainer. 'find -ls' (and in fact most of the
size-related bits of find) is broken in older versions of findutils.
Newer versions, including 4.1.20 in unstable, work fine for me. I'm
seeing exactly the same output from '/usr/bin/find . -ls' and
'/sw/bin/find . -ls'. If
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Macks wrote:
| In implementing variants, I'm doing some percent expansions on Package
| using %things that may not be known to previous fink. That means (I
| think) that if a user selfupdates while running an older fink and
| there are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
David R. Morrison wrote:
| Martin Costabel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
|
|I think we will have to restart the old discussion of /sw/Applications,
|too. And I mean a real discussion, not the hasty erection of religious
|taboos as we had in the past.
19 matches
Mail list logo
