Re: [Fink-devel] fink using apt-get [with patch rev. 7 & 8]

On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 11:17:00AM +0200, Christian Schaffner wrote: > > On 29.09.2004, at 11:57, Michal 'hramrach' Suchanek wrote: > > >Hello > > > >I tried to download a package with versions 5 and 8 of the patch but it > >is hard to find one that would download form the binary distribution. >

Re: [Fink-devel] fink using apt-get [with patch rev. 7 & 8]

On 29.09.2004, at 11:57, Michal 'hramrach' Suchanek wrote: Hello I tried to download a package with versions 5 and 8 of the patch but it is hard to find one that would download form the binary distribution. Well, you could try svn-client-ssl-1.0.6-11. And others... :) Is there also support for down

Re: [Fink-devel] fink using apt-get [with patch rev. 9]

On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 11:14:52AM +0200, Christian Schaffner wrote: > > it seems that you are missing the patch file in the patch submission > item at func=detail&aid=1037296&group_id=17203&atid=317203> > Or am i missing something? *grumble*. It's th

Re: [Fink-devel] fink using apt-get [with patch rev. 9]

Hi Daniel On 30.09.2004, at 07:24, Daniel Macks wrote: On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 11:12:22PM +0200, Christian Schaffner wrote: Here comes revision 9 of the patch... [snip discussion] This patch is also added to the patch submission tracker at:

Re: [Fink-devel] fink using apt-get [with patch rev. 9]

Daniel Macks wrote: [] While doing that, I noticed that "apt-get --print-uris" does not print things that if one has already compiled a package, apt-get may see that .deb in preference to one from the apt server. Probably best to not "fetch" those file: URIs into the cache/apt dir. Also, that means

Re: [Fink-devel] fink using apt-get [with patch rev. 9]

On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 11:12:22PM +0200, Christian Schaffner wrote: > Here comes revision 9 of the patch... [snip discussion] > This patch is also added to the patch submission tracker at: > func=detail&aid=1037296&group_id=17203&atid=317203> We discu

Re: [Fink-devel] fink using apt-get [with patch rev. 9]

Here comes revision 9 of the patch... On 28.09.2004, at 22:13, Christian Schaffner wrote: Anyway, added to that mail are two patches: #7 implements all enhancements described here and downloads the debs into /sw/fink/debs with a symlink to it in /sw/var/cache/apt/archives/. #8 also has all cha

Re: [Fink-devel] fink using apt-get [with patch rev. 7 & 8]

Hello I tried to download a package with versions 5 and 8 of the patch but it is hard to find one that would download form the binary distribution. Is there also support for downloading dependencies that are older in the apt repository than in fink but should suffice for the requested package? T

Re: [Fink-devel] fink using apt-get [with patch rev. 7 & 8]

Hi Daniel Thank you very much for your feedback. I try to comment, although most of what you are discussing comes from the decisions made by bbraun in the first revision of the patch. So we should wait for his comments too. On 28.09.2004, at 18:36, Daniel Macks wrote: Some thoughts on patch #5:

Re: [Fink-devel] fink using apt-get

On 08.09.2004, at 00:32, Rob Braun wrote: On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 04:31:33PM -0700, Rob Braun wrote: I've come up with a patch that does this. I've been testing the patch locally, but have not tested it extensively. I'll test it with larger dependency chains later, when I get access to better co

Re: [Fink-devel] fink using apt-get [with patch rev.5]

Some thoughts on patch #5: Our .deb repository is built with %p=/sw. If that is not how a user has configured his fink, even a .deb present in apt-cache is not usable. In PkgVersion::apt_fetch, you appear to download the .deb to $basepath/fink/debs. Is our apt-get hacked to know to look there, do

Re: [Fink-devel] fink using apt-get [with new patch]

On 08.09.2004, at 00:32, Rob Braun wrote: On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 04:31:33PM -0700, Rob Braun wrote: I've come up with a patch that does this. I've been testing the patch locally, but have not tested it extensively. I'll test it with larger dependency chains later, when I get access to better co

Re: [Fink-devel] fink using apt-get [with patch]

[try again with the patch attached...] Hi Rob On 08.09.2004, at 00:32, Rob Braun wrote: On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 04:31:33PM -0700, Rob Braun wrote: I've come up with a patch that does this. I've been testing the patch locally, but have not tested it extensively. I'll test it with larger dependency

Re: [Fink-devel] fink using apt-get

Hi Rob On 08.09.2004, at 00:32, Rob Braun wrote: On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 04:31:33PM -0700, Rob Braun wrote: I've come up with a patch that does this. I've been testing the patch locally, but have not tested it extensively. I'll test it with larger dependency chains later, when I get access to bet

Re: [Fink-devel] fink using apt-get

Hi Rob On 08.09.2004, at 00:32, Rob Braun wrote: On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 04:31:33PM -0700, Rob Braun wrote: I've come up with a patch that does this. I've been testing the patch locally, but have not tested it extensively. I'll test it with larger dependency chains later, when I get access to bet

Re: [Fink-devel] fink using apt-get

On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 07:00:14PM -0700, Rob Braun wrote: > On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 06:31:48PM -0600, TheSin wrote: > > > > so the description is true but the implementation isn't that difficult. > > and using the download only option in apt-get will fix the problem in > > your 2nd step/requir

Re: [Fink-devel] fink using apt-get

On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 04:31:33PM -0700, Rob Braun wrote: > > I've come up with a patch that does this. I've been testing the > patch locally, but have not tested it extensively. I'll test it with > larger dependency chains later, when I get access to better connectivity. > Known issues: it is

Re: [Fink-devel] fink using apt-get

On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 06:31:48PM -0600, TheSin wrote: > > so the description is true but the implementation isn't that difficult. > and using the download only option in apt-get will fix the problem in > your 2nd step/requirement. As you can see in the patch, that is what it does. Uses the

Re: [Fink-devel] fink using apt-get

well this isn't 100% true. I made fink do this in the past. This is what I did 1) use fink to get the list of depends including version and revision. 2) in the fink engine before the fetch, do an apt-get install on a versioned version, if an error then continue, else set to installed and continu

[Fink-devel] fink using apt-get

Something I have been toying with for a while now is fink being able to use apt-get-able packages. Sometimes when building something large, many of the dependency packages are already in a bindist somewhere, and I'd rather not build each and every one, just the packages newer than what is in the b