Re: [Fink-devel] libjpeg-shlibs and libjpeg dependencies in your packages!

2010-06-23 Thread Sjors Gielen
Op 23 jun 2010, om 16:17 heeft Koen van der Drift het volgende geschreven: > Sjors, > > Feel free to send me those files if they could help. I have some time > tonight (I'm in the US) to test, but after that I am very busy for > several days. I have committed an updated apt.info to my experimen

Re: [Fink-devel] libjpeg-shlibs and libjpeg dependencies in your packages!

2010-06-23 Thread Koen van der Drift
Sjors, Feel free to send me those files if they could help. I have some time tonight (I'm in the US) to test, but after that I am very busy for several days. - Koen. On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Sjors Gielen wrote: > > Op 23 jun 2010, om 14:13 heeft Alexander Hansen het volgende geschreven:

Re: [Fink-devel] libjpeg-shlibs and libjpeg dependencies in your packages!

2010-06-23 Thread Sjors Gielen
Op 23 jun 2010, om 14:13 heeft Alexander Hansen het volgende geschreven: > If you're running a HEAD fink the parallel build option might well be > set (it's out in the wild as of 0.29.11, too). Check /sw/etc/fink.conf > for a MaxBuildJobs field. Is it possible this bug is really in the configur

Re: [Fink-devel] libjpeg-shlibs and libjpeg dependencies in your packages!

2010-06-23 Thread Alexander Hansen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 6/23/10 6:05 AM, Koen van der Drift wrote: > > On Jun 23, 2010, at 4:40 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: > >> The [262] tells you that there are 262 levels of "make" running. >> Either there is an infinite loop (but then this should happen to >> oth

Re: [Fink-devel] libjpeg-shlibs and libjpeg dependencies in your packages!

2010-06-23 Thread Koen van der Drift
On Jun 23, 2010, at 4:40 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: > The [262] tells you that there are 262 levels of "make" running. > Either there is an infinite loop (but then this should happen to > others, too), or it is a question of parallel make running wild. Do > you somehow have your fink tweake

Re: [Fink-devel] libjpeg-shlibs and libjpeg dependencies in your packages!

2010-06-23 Thread Daniel E. Macks
Martin Costabel said: > Koen van der Drift wrote: > [] >> make[262]: Makefile:11: fork: Resource temporarily unavailable >> make[262]: vfork: Resource temporarily unavailable >> make[261]: *** [dirs] Error 2 > > The [262] tells you that there are 262 levels of "make" running. Either > there is an

Re: [Fink-devel] libjpeg-shlibs and libjpeg dependencies in your packages!

2010-06-23 Thread Martin Costabel
Koen van der Drift wrote: [] > make[262]: Makefile:11: fork: Resource temporarily unavailable > make[262]: vfork: Resource temporarily unavailable > make[261]: *** [dirs] Error 2 The [262] tells you that there are 262 levels of "make" running. Either there is an infinite loop (but then this shoul

Re: [Fink-devel] libjpeg-shlibs and libjpeg dependencies in your packages!

2010-06-22 Thread Koen van der Drift
On Jun 22, 2010, at 8:39 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > I've historically resorted to logging out and back in or rebooting > when > I've had this error. > Still get the same error after a reboot. - Koen. -- ThinkGeek

Re: [Fink-devel] libjpeg-shlibs and libjpeg dependencies in your packages!

2010-06-22 Thread Alexander Hansen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 6/22/10 11:31 AM, Sjors Gielen wrote: > > Op 22 jun 2010, om 16:41 heeft Max Horn het volgende geschreven: > >> Well, there is always good old "grep", which gives the list below of 245 >> .info files containing the string "libjpeg-shlibs" in my u

Re: [Fink-devel] libjpeg-shlibs and libjpeg dependencies in your packages!

2010-06-22 Thread Daniel E. Macks
Sjors Gielen said: > > Op 22 jun 2010, om 16:41 heeft Max Horn het volgende geschreven: > >> Well, there is always good old "grep", which gives the list below of 245 >> .info files containing the string "libjpeg-shlibs" in my unstable tree. Some >> of those may not be really dependencies, but mo

Re: [Fink-devel] libjpeg-shlibs and libjpeg dependencies in your packages!

2010-06-22 Thread Sjors Gielen
Op 22 jun 2010, om 16:41 heeft Max Horn het volgende geschreven: > Well, there is always good old "grep", which gives the list below of 245 > .info files containing the string "libjpeg-shlibs" in my unstable tree. Some > of those may not be really dependencies, but most probably are (I didn't

Re: [Fink-devel] libjpeg-shlibs and libjpeg dependencies in your packages!

2010-06-22 Thread Max Horn
Am 22.06.2010 um 15:27 schrieb Sjors Gielen: > > Op 22 jun 2010, om 15:13 heeft Max Horn het volgende geschreven: > >> Hi Sjors, >> >> may I ask how you arrived at exactly that list? There many many more >> packages which depend on libjpeg instead of libjpeg8. Maybe those packages >> are the

Re: [Fink-devel] libjpeg-shlibs and libjpeg dependencies in your packages!

2010-06-22 Thread Daniel E. Macks
Sjors Gielen said: > Op 22 jun 2010, om 15:13 heeft Max Horn het volgende geschreven: >> >> may I ask how you arrived at exactly that list? There many many >> more packages which depend on libjpeg instead of libjpeg8. Maybe >> those packages are the ones that are used by KDE / Qt ? > > These are o

Re: [Fink-devel] libjpeg-shlibs and libjpeg dependencies in your packages!

2010-06-22 Thread Alexander Hansen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 6/22/10 9:27 AM, Sjors Gielen wrote: > > Op 22 jun 2010, om 15:13 heeft Max Horn het volgende geschreven: > >> Hi Sjors, >> >> may I ask how you arrived at exactly that list? There many many more >> packages which depend on libjpeg instead of lib

Re: [Fink-devel] libjpeg-shlibs and libjpeg dependencies in your packages!

2010-06-22 Thread Sjors Gielen
Op 22 jun 2010, om 15:13 heeft Max Horn het volgende geschreven: > Hi Sjors, > > may I ask how you arrived at exactly that list? There many many more packages > which depend on libjpeg instead of libjpeg8. Maybe those packages are the > ones that are used by KDE / Qt ? These are only the pack

Re: [Fink-devel] libjpeg-shlibs and libjpeg dependencies in your packages!

2010-06-22 Thread Max Horn
Am 21.06.2010 um 22:42 schrieb Sjors Gielen: > Hello Dave, Justin, Alexander, William, > > I am sending you this e-mail to inform you that one or some of your packages > depend on libjpeg-shlibs and/or builddepend on libjpeg. I have seen > libjpeg-related crashes on various machines, most prob

Re: [Fink-devel] libjpeg-shlibs and libjpeg dependencies in your packages!

2010-06-22 Thread Alexander Hansen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 6/22/10 6:17 AM, Koen van der Drift wrote: > > On Jun 22, 2010, at 6:06 AM, Sjors Gielen wrote: > >> Do you have a process limit set for your shell? > > Not that I am aware of. > > >> What does 'ulimit -u' say? > > 266 > > >> Does this probl

Re: [Fink-devel] libjpeg-shlibs and libjpeg dependencies in your packages!

2010-06-22 Thread Koen van der Drift
On Jun 22, 2010, at 6:06 AM, Sjors Gielen wrote: > Do you have a process limit set for your shell? Not that I am aware of. > What does 'ulimit -u' say? 266 > Does this problem repeat if you build again, with less user > processes running concurrently? (The default value for the user > p

Re: [Fink-devel] libjpeg-shlibs and libjpeg dependencies in your packages!

2010-06-22 Thread Sjors Gielen
Op 22 jun 2010, om 05:17 heeft Koen van der Drift het volgende geschreven: > Building your apt fails on my iMac G5, with 10.5.8; dpkg went fine. Thanks for trying! Let's see. This looks weird... > config.status: executing default commands > make[262]: Makefile:11: fork: Resource temporarily una

Re: [Fink-devel] libjpeg-shlibs and libjpeg dependencies in your packages!

2010-06-22 Thread Sjors Gielen
Op 21 jun 2010, om 23:42 heeft William G. Scott het volgende geschreven: > If you would be willing to make the fixes, I would be especially grateful. > I'm trying to get my NIH grant renewal finished. > > I "inherited" the package from Jack Howarth, but am not particularly > qualified to maint

Re: [Fink-devel] libjpeg-shlibs and libjpeg dependencies in your packages!

2010-06-22 Thread Sjors Gielen
Hi David, First of all - > P.S. Two of the packages of mine which you mention -- imagemagick1-shlibs > and libdjvulibre15-shlibs -- are in fact old (perhaps obsolete) versions of > packages which exist in newer versions in fink. THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO > REASON TO CHANGE OBSOLETE PACKAGES to

[Fink-devel] libjpeg-shlibs and libjpeg dependencies in your packages!

2010-06-21 Thread Koen van der Drift
On Jun 21, 2010, at 4:42 PM, Sjors Gielen wrote: > PS: I still need testers for the new dpkg and apt! They can be found > in my experimental directory (/experimental/dazjorz/finkinfo). They > are way more up-to-date, more featureful, nicer, faster, and should > work without problems, but I

Re: [Fink-devel] libjpeg-shlibs and libjpeg dependencies in your packages!

2010-06-21 Thread David R. Morrison
Dear Sjors, I'm not convinced that you have correctly diagnosed the crashes you have seen. The shared libraries of libjpeg and libjpeg8 have different names, and the dynamic linker cannot possibly confuse them. There is a remote possibility that some other library is confusing symbols between l

[Fink-devel] libjpeg-shlibs and libjpeg dependencies in your packages!

2010-06-21 Thread Sjors Gielen
Hello Dave, Justin, Alexander, William, I am sending you this e-mail to inform you that one or some of your packages depend on libjpeg-shlibs and/or builddepend on libjpeg. I have seen libjpeg-related crashes on various machines, most probably related to KDE or Qt loading whatever jpeg library