Re: [Fink-devel] The FAQ

2002-11-04 Thread Alexander Hansen
Since I was going to add a section about the problem I had with libgtop, I can add a section about bad download URLs (I just answered two posts today on the issue). On Sat, 2002-11-02 at 17:56, Martin Costabel wrote: Max Horn wrote: [] So I'll look into working over it now a bit. I'd

Re: [Fink-devel] ncurses

2002-11-04 Thread Chris Zubrzycki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday, November 4, 2002, at 01:56 AM, Chris Zubrzycki wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 hey guys. I have a new revision of ncurses 5.2, which should also know about apple's terminfo entries, as well as termcap stuff, and I

[Fink-devel] -isystem and LIBRARY_PATH problems

2002-11-04 Thread Masanori Sekino
I'm reinstalling fink due to partition corruption and I got build error with following package, - imlib-1.9.10-9 - gnome-applets 1.4.0.5-3 - libgnomeprint2-1.116.0-2 I'm using 10.2 tree and fink-0.11.0.cvs-20021102.0124. I'm wondering which package, fink or other, should be fixed. Ideas?

[Fink-devel] FAQ additions

2002-11-04 Thread Alexander Hansen
Here's the material that I said I'd add to the FAQ (I don't have commit access): [ldx3:~/web/xml/faq] hansen% cvs diff -u faq.xml Index: faq.xml === RCS file: /cvsroot/fink/web/xml/faq/faq.xml,v retrieving revision 1.46 diff -u

Re: [Fink-devel] -isystem and LIBRARY_PATH problems

2002-11-04 Thread jfm
You seem to imply that LIBRARY_PATH might also be involved... For imlib, it is not the case, and testing the 2 others is underway.. I have to rush to a seminar_ results afterwards. Jean-Francois --- This SF.net email is sponsored by:

[Fink-devel] Fink audiofile package

2002-11-04 Thread Jason Deraleau
I have been having a lot of problems lately with installing the audiofile package. It appears the sources are out of date. I am running Fink unstable distribution. I get the following: Downloading the file audiofile-0.2.3.tar.gz failed. (1) Give up (2) Retry the same mirror (3) Retry another

[Fink-devel] Re: Fink audiofile package

2002-11-04 Thread Justin Hallett
I need your OSX version and the output of fink --version please, though i know what the problem is I just need to know where to fix it. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I have been having a lot of problems lately with installing the audiofile package. It appears the sources are out of date. I am running

[Fink-devel] Re: Fink audiofile package

2002-11-04 Thread Justin Hallett
well i haven't looked at the output just yet, i will when i get a chance but I'm telling you now your script isn't doing something cause I just tested the files for audiofile in cvs and they are fine. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Actually, I have a script that runs fink selfupdate-cvs and fink

Re: [Fink-devel] -isystem and LIBRARY_PATH problems

2002-11-04 Thread jfm
LIBRARY_PATH poses no problems here... Jean-Francois --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ApacheCon, November 18-21 in Las Vegas (supported by COMDEX), the only Apache event to be fully supported by the ASF. http://www.apachecon.com

Re: [Fink-devel] -isystem problems in current cvs with pstoedit

2002-11-04 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Monday, November 4, 2002, at 01:11 PM, Ben Hines wrote: Bingo. definitely a gcc bug, already filed: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl and search for 7327. My apologies for posting this and promptly going to bed. Thanks Jean-Francois, Max and Ben for looking into it. It kind of

[Fink-devel] Re: Fink audiofile package

2002-11-04 Thread Jason Deraleau
non of that matters the fact that it's looking in gnome-pre2 means your file it out of date, all those ? at the beginning are files that aren't even getting updated. And could be causing cvs to skip it all. Trust me your info IS uout of date. ### Source:

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Fink audiofile package

2002-11-04 Thread Alexander Hansen
The output looked odd to me. Can you verify that /sw/fink/dists is a symlink to /sw/fink/10.2? On Mon, 2002-11-04 at 12:39, Jason Deraleau wrote: if it is present in the stable tree it'll take it first anyhow, but i checked both. infacted i check my personal sandbox and the 10.1 tree

[Fink-devel] Accelerated OpenGL under OSX and X windows.

2002-11-04 Thread Stephen Hocking
Has anyone in the XonX team sat down coded up the libGL stuff as a relatively thin wrapper around Apple's native implementation? Stephen -- The views expressed above are not those of PGS Tensor. We've heard that a million monkeys at a million keyboards could produce the

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink clean install on 10.2 issues? (was Re: Finkaudiofile package)

2002-11-04 Thread Martin Costabel
Jason Deraleau wrote: . Since I am doing this using clean installs following the instructions provided word for word on two different Jaguar systems, I have a feeling it's something wrong with the Fink directions or distribution. How can I help the developers track this problem down? This has

Re: [Fink-devel] Accelerated OpenGL under OSX and X windows.

2002-11-04 Thread Torrey Lyons
At 3:14 PM -0600 11/4/02, Stephen Hocking wrote: Has anyone in the XonX team sat down coded up the libGL stuff as a relatively thin wrapper around Apple's native implementation? (Probably not the ideal list for this question, but...) Yes. TOT XFree86 CVS. :-) --Torrey

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink clean install on 10.2 issues? (was Re: Fink audiofile package)

2002-11-04 Thread David R. Morrison
Jason, You are following the instructions on the jag-bootstrap page, and yet one of your earlier messages showed that you were in a fink-0.4.1-full directory? Where did that come from? You shouldn't have fink-0.4.1 on your system at all if you are following those instructions... -- Dave

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink clean install on 10.2 issues? (was Re: Fink audiofile package)

2002-11-04 Thread David R. Morrison
I've tried with both source installers I could find on the Fink page. Well, one is intended for 10.1 and one for 10.2, so that could be part of the problem. If you ran the bootstrap.sh found in the fink-0.4.1-full tarball, then you installed an old, 10.1, version of fink and you need to do the

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink clean install on 10.2 issues? (was Re: Fink audiofile package)

2002-11-04 Thread Jason Deraleau
If you ran the bootstrap.sh found in the fink-0.11.0 tarball (as instructed on the jag-bootstrap page) then everything should be fine. If it is not, let's try to debug some more. -- Dave The problem here is that the original issue I had was with the audiofile package not being able to be

Re: [Fink-devel] ncurses

2002-11-04 Thread Max Horn
At 12:43 Uhr -0500 04.11.2002, Chris Zubrzycki wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday, November 4, 2002, at 12:20 PM, Carsten Klapp wrote: Too bad about the symbol changes in 5.3 I can't use it yet, anyway both built for me without any problems on 10.2.1. (Nice that

Re: [Fink-devel] The FAQ

2002-11-04 Thread Hisashi T Fujinaka
I can't find Alexander Hansen's email address (the archives strip the addresses.) Sorry to post this to the list, but can you email me Alexander? Thanks. On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Max Horn wrote: Hisashi T Fujinaka and Alexander Hansen both offered to work on the FAQ. Guys, can you communicate with

Re: [Fink-devel] -isystem and LIBRARY_PATH problems

2002-11-04 Thread Ben Hines
On Monday, November 4, 2002, at 02:18 PM, Max Horn wrote: You are using an experimental CVS version of Fink. It's kinda normal you encounter problems :-) In this case, the -isystem causes a warning, and the packages specifcy -Werror, thus the warning gets turned into an error. The fix tha

Re: [Fink-devel] ncurses

2002-11-04 Thread Chris Zubrzycki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday, November 4, 2002, at 05:28 PM, Max Horn wrote: At 12:43 Uhr -0500 04.11.2002, Chris Zubrzycki wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday, November 4, 2002, at 12:20 PM, Carsten Klapp wrote: Too bad about the

Re: [Fink-devel] -isystem problems in current cvs with pstoedit

2002-11-04 Thread Max Horn
At 23:56 Uhr +0900 04.11.2002, Peter O'Gorman wrote: On Monday, November 4, 2002, at 01:11 PM, Ben Hines wrote: Bingo. definitely a gcc bug, already filed: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl and search for 7327. My apologies for posting this and promptly going to bed. Thanks

Re: [Fink-devel] -isystem problems in current cvs with pstoedit

2002-11-04 Thread Justin Hallett
two things, #1 i have a libxml2 pkg in my exp that conforms to the new env vars #2, is the best way for pkgs that the -isystem breaks it to do a NoSetCPPFLAGS then use a compilescript to set CPPFLAGS? could we not add a ResetCPPFLAGS?? that would not include defaults options only what I set?

[Fink-devel] Bochs does not run

2002-11-04 Thread Kyle Moffett
I am unable to get bochs to work, it dies with a cannot find font error. Something about xfs is screwy too, trying to run 'xfs' gives the following output: xfs notice: listening on port 7100 xfs notice: ignoring font path element /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc (bad font path descriptor) xfs

Re: [Fink-devel] -isystem problems in current cvs with pstoedit

2002-11-04 Thread Max Horn
At 15:28 Uhr -0700 04.11.2002, Justin Hallett wrote: two things, #1 i have a libxml2 pkg in my exp that conforms to the new env vars Fine, but there is really no need for that. First off, I will convert the package myself once (or rather: if !) there is a release of Fink with the code in it.

Re: [Fink-devel] -isystem problems in current cvs with pstoedit

2002-11-04 Thread Justin Hallett
OH I understand this, it's jsut I needed it for testing, and I thought I'd let you know since i didn't nothingn to the patch it's self just the info file to save you some time later if need be. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Fine, but there is really no need for that. First off, I will convert the

Re: [Fink-devel] -isystem problems in current cvs with pstoedit

2002-11-04 Thread Justin Hallett
ahhh perfect thanks Max, i guess we should doc this someplace for others. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: You can, and always could, do this: SetCPPFLAGS: -I%p/include NoSetCPPFLAGS: true The NoSetCPPFLAGS has only one effect: don't add the default value for CPPFLAGS

Re: [Fink-devel] -isystem problems in current cvs with pstoedit

2002-11-04 Thread Ben Hines
On Monday, November 4, 2002, at 02:22 PM, Max Horn wrote: At 23:56 Uhr +0900 04.11.2002, Peter O'Gorman wrote: On Monday, November 4, 2002, at 01:11 PM, Ben Hines wrote: Bingo. definitely a gcc bug, already filed: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl and search for 7327. My apologies

Re: [Fink-devel] -isystem problems in current cvs with pstoedit

2002-11-04 Thread Ben Hines
On Monday, November 4, 2002, at 04:26 PM, Ben Hines wrote: A simple reproducible case is now appended to the FSF bug, from me.. I can't find how to link directly to their bugs, but http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl and search for 7327, scroll to bottom for my steps. To clarify, i

Re: [Fink-devel] -isystem problems in current cvs with pstoedit

2002-11-04 Thread Ben Hines
This sounds like a great idea. -Ben On Monday, November 4, 2002, at 05:00 PM, Justin Hallett wrote: so as a temp fix why don't we make use of GCC: 3.1 and if GCC: 3.1 then CPPFLAGS = -I/sw/include instead of -isystem?? [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Anyway, the workaround (disabling isystem)

Re: [Fink-devel] -isystem problems in current cvs with pstoedit

2002-11-04 Thread Max Horn
At 16:26 Uhr -0800 04.11.2002, Ben Hines wrote: On Monday, November 4, 2002, at 02:22 PM, Max Horn wrote: At 23:56 Uhr +0900 04.11.2002, Peter O'Gorman wrote: On Monday, November 4, 2002, at 01:11 PM, Ben Hines wrote: Bingo. definitely a gcc bug, already filed:

Re: [Fink-devel] -isystem problems in current cvs with pstoedit

2002-11-04 Thread Max Horn
At 17:15 Uhr -0800 04.11.2002, Ben Hines wrote: This sounds like a great idea. -Ben On Monday, November 4, 2002, at 05:00 PM, Justin Hallett wrote: so as a temp fix why don't we make use of GCC: 3.1 and if GCC: 3.1 then CPPFLAGS = -I/sw/include instead of -isystem?? A great idea? Well, it

Re: [Fink-devel] -isystem problems in current cvs with pstoedit

2002-11-04 Thread Justin Hallett
well I've encontered it once so far on a package not mentioned on the list, but that is it for me so far. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: haven't encountered a problem I couldn't resolve easily, and not a single issue of the above mentioned GCC bug.

Re: [Fink-devel] -isystem problems in current cvs with pstoedit

2002-11-04 Thread Ben Hines
On Monday, November 4, 2002, at 05:48 PM, Max Horn wrote: Note that I already built dozens of dozens packages with current CVS of Fink, including my existing system, and a fresh bootstrap, and including such packages as kdebase3-ssl and other things. So far I haven't encountered a problem I