Re: [Fink-devel] fink selfupdate-cvs warning (control-center-2.0.3-2)

2003-11-16 Thread Daniel Macks
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 11:18:09PM -0600, Joel L. Breazeale wrote: > > When doing a fink selfupdate-cvs I get the following warning shown in > context: [...] >WARNING: Unable to parse the line "Replaces %N (<< 2.0.1.1-1)" in > "/sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/finkinfo/gnome/control-center-2.0.3-

[Fink-devel] fink selfupdate-cvs warning (control-center-2.0.3-2)

2003-11-16 Thread Joel L. Breazeale
Folks, When doing a fink selfupdate-cvs I get the following warning shown in context: [mogwai:~] % sudo fink selfupdate-cvs Please note: the command 'fink selfupdate' should be used for routine updating; you only need to use 'fink selfupdate-cvs' or 'fink selfupdate-rsync' if you

Re: [Fink-devel] Ethereal and Eterm

2003-11-16 Thread Gary Kerbaugh
on 11/16/03 8:23 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > Which did you recompile, imlib or eterm? > I have to say that¹s an excellent point so I was compelled recompile both, several times. Originally it was Eterm but I'm surprised I hadn't recompiled both. I also wanted to see if my flags made any dif

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: fink/t/PkgVersion get_perl.t,1.3,1.4

2003-11-16 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 06:51:20PM -0500, David R. Morrison wrote: > Actually, in the mean while Ben added some stuff to the Makefile. > You can now use "make install" to run ./inject.pl, so a reasonable new > way to work is "make test; make install". "make test && make install" so if the tests fa

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: fink/t/PkgVersion get_perl.t,1.3,1.4

2003-11-16 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 02:58:40PM +0100, Max Horn wrote: > But note, as long as we don't incorporate the tests into our > development model, they will keep on getting broken. So far we haven't > yet agreed as a team to actually regularly use the tests. If you want > to achieve that, you may wan

Re: [Fink-devel] Basic style guide (was Re: fink/perlmod/Fink Bootstrap.pm,1.40,1.41 Command.pm,1.3,1.4 Config.pm,1.25,1.26 Mirror.pm,1.10,1.11)

2003-11-16 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 02:53:54PM +0100, Max Horn wrote: > >I'm really hoping to keep it sane. > > I think Ben's point was that there is absolutly no point in "arguing" > about this. There are reasons for every possible side. Simply because > there is no "correct solution". It's a matter of tas

Re: Selfupdate-rsync is broken (Was Re: [Fink-devel] "WARNING: Unable to parse ..." after upgrade)

2003-11-16 Thread David R. Morrison
Max Horn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ah! > > To quote http://rsync.samba.org/: > > NEWS for rsync version 2.5.6, aka the dwd-between-jobs release > Changes since version 2.5.5: > >ENHANCEMENTS: > > * The --delete-after option now implies --delete. (Wayne Davison) > > [...] > > >

Re: [Fink-devel] Ethereal and Eterm

2003-11-16 Thread Alexander Hansen
Which did you recompile, imlib or eterm? On Sunday, November 16, 2003, at 07:52 PM, Gary Kerbaugh wrote: Hi guys, I'm not having much luck with the E's recently. Every time Ethereal starts or stops I get a list of errors and warnings like the follwing: ** WARNING **: The plugin artnet.so has

[Fink-devel] libfinch release 0.0.1

2003-11-16 Thread Kyle Moffett
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I have just released version 0.0.1 of libfinch, which I hope will eventually replace the Fink dependency engine. A Fink package info file is posted on the Fink package submission tracker, ID 843416. http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php? func=de

[Fink-devel] Ethereal and Eterm

2003-11-16 Thread Gary Kerbaugh
Hi guys, I'm not having much luck with the E's recently. Every time Ethereal starts or stops I get a list of errors and warnings like the follwing: ** WARNING **: The plugin artnet.so has no version symbol ** WARNING **: The plugin gryphon.so has no version symbol ** WARNING **: /Users/kerb

[Fink-devel] X11 Dependency Rework (was: Re: [Fink-users] X11 and aalib binaries)

2003-11-16 Thread Benjamin Reed
(replying to fink-devel, for packagers) Peter O'Gorman wrote: I think it needs to be changed. Binary only users should not need to install Apple's X11SDK to get the x11 provides. I've committed a change to fink's virtuals to provide system-xfree86 in a different way. The new behavior (which is

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: fink/t/PkgVersion get_perl.t,1.3,1.4

2003-11-16 Thread Benjamin Reed
Max Horn wrote: Am Montag, 17.11.03 um 00:51 Uhr schrieb David R. Morrison: Actually, in the mean while Ben added some stuff to the Makefile. You can now use "make install" to run ./inject.pl, so a reasonable new way to work is "make test; make install". But I am not using "make install". Plus th

[Fink-devel] again: fileutils/gettext problem

2003-11-16 Thread Max Horn
Another trace on the fileutils/gettext problem: A user mailed me who experienced the "fileutils" crashes. I told him to do this: sudo dpkg --remove fileutils fink reinstall gettext fink reinstall fileutils And that fixed the issue. So that seems to be another hint at the prebinding (or

Re: [Fink-devel] XFree86 and Apple's X11

2003-11-16 Thread Gary Kerbaugh
on 11/16/03 3:23 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: > Can you post a link? Absolutely! I should have anyway. Here's the MacOSXHints http://www.macosxhints.com/article.php?story=20031106151631171 Here's one for Apple's UNIX list: http://discussions.info.apple.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]@.599c426d In tha

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: fink/t/PkgVersion get_perl.t,1.3,1.4

2003-11-16 Thread Max Horn
Am Montag, 17.11.03 um 00:51 Uhr schrieb David R. Morrison: Actually, in the mean while Ben added some stuff to the Makefile. You can now use "make install" to run ./inject.pl, so a reasonable new way to work is "make test; make install". But I am not using "make install". Plus this won't work for

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: fink/t/PkgVersion get_perl.t,1.3,1.4

2003-11-16 Thread David R. Morrison
Actually, in the mean while Ben added some stuff to the Makefile. You can now use "make install" to run ./inject.pl, so a reasonable new way to work is "make test; make install". -- Dave --- This SF. Net email is sponsored by: GoToMyPC GoToMy

[Fink-devel] Re: fink/perlmod/Fink ChangeLog,1.411.2.1,1.411.2.2 VirtPackage.pm,1.22,1.22.2.1

2003-11-16 Thread Max Horn
Am Sonntag, 16.11.03 um 23:02 Uhr schrieb Benjamin Reed: Update of /cvsroot/fink/fink/perlmod/Fink In directory sc8-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv15238/perlmod/Fink Modified Files: Tag: branch_0_17 ChangeLog VirtPackage.pm Log Message: back-ported xfree86 changes to the 0.17 branch I am a bit

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: fink/t/PkgVersion get_perl.t,1.3,1.4

2003-11-16 Thread Max Horn
Am Sonntag, 16.11.03 um 17:28 Uhr schrieb David R. Morrison: [...] Anyway, I think we need a way of having ./inject.pl run the test suite. For that matter, we should probably have our users run the test suite as they are compiling the fink package manager for themselves, as a further check that

Re: Selfupdate-rsync is broken (Was Re: [Fink-devel] "WARNING: Unable to parse ..." after upgrade)

2003-11-16 Thread Max Horn
Ah! To quote http://rsync.samba.org/: NEWS for rsync version 2.5.6, aka the dwd-between-jobs release Changes since version 2.5.5: ENHANCEMENTS: * The --delete-after option now implies --delete. (Wayne Davison) [...] --> I think that is exactly the problem. Fixing it should be trivial.

Re: Selfupdate-rsync is broken (Was Re: [Fink-devel] "WARNING: Unable to parse ..." after upgrade)

2003-11-16 Thread Max Horn
Am Sonntag, 16.11.03 um 19:58 Uhr schrieb Martin Costabel: Don McKenzie Paul wrote: Still a problem using the system version of rsync in 10.2.8. Perhaps that tells us something. [] /usr/bin/su donpaul -c "rsync -az --delete-after -v --include='10.2-gcc3.3/' --include='10.2-gcc3.3/stable/' --in

Re: [Fink-devel] "WARNING: Unable to parse ..." after upgrade

2003-11-16 Thread Max Horn
Am Montag, 17.11.03 um 00:16 Uhr schrieb b.bum: On Nov 16, 2003, at 10:48 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: Randal L. Schwartz wrote: [] OK... that's the problem. The "rsync" package in fink is broken. I am against the death penalty, in general, but in this case it seems appropriate. In any case, Panth

Re: [Fink-devel] "WARNING: Unable to parse ..." after upgrade

2003-11-16 Thread b.bum
On Nov 16, 2003, at 10:48 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: Randal L. Schwartz wrote: [] OK... that's the problem. The "rsync" package in fink is broken. I am against the death penalty, in general, but in this case it seems appropriate. In any case, Panther's rsync is more recent than 2.5.5 I haven't s

Re: [Fink-devel] XFree86 and Apple's X11

2003-11-16 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
Can you post a link? On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 15:03, Gary Kerbaugh wrote: > Hi guys, > >I regularly campaign against such suggestions as I can't imagine that > problems wouldn't eventually ensue. However, I'm not expert enough to claim > this with conviction. Now a hint has surfaced at MacOSXH

[Fink-devel] XFree86 and Apple's X11

2003-11-16 Thread Gary Kerbaugh
Hi guys, As a helper on Apple's UNIX list I regularly see suggestions that both Xdarwin and Apple's X11 be installed on the same computer. I imagine that most of these people don't realize that both of these packages also install versions of X11 in /usr/X11R6 and /etc/X11. If someone installed

Selfupdate-rsync is broken (Was Re: [Fink-devel] "WARNING: Unable to parse ..." after upgrade)

2003-11-16 Thread Martin Costabel
Don McKenzie Paul wrote: Still a problem using the system version of rsync in 10.2.8. Perhaps that tells us something. [] /usr/bin/su donpaul -c "rsync -az --delete-after -v --include='10.2-gcc3.3/' --include='10.2-gcc3.3/stable/' --include='10.2-gcc3.3/stable/main/' --include='10.2-gcc3.3/sta

Re: [Fink-devel] "WARNING: Unable to parse ..." after upgrade

2003-11-16 Thread Darian Lanx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Randal L. Schwartz wrote: "Martin" == Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Martin> If you want to test this, you could move this remporarily out of the Martin> way so that /usr/bin/rsync is used and look if the selfupdate works Martin> dif

Re: [Fink-devel] "WARNING: Unable to parse ..." after upgrade

2003-11-16 Thread Martin Costabel
Randal L. Schwartz wrote: [] OK... that's the problem. The "rsync" package in fink is broken. I am against the death penalty, in general, but in this case it seems appropriate. In any case, Panther's rsync is more recent than 2.5.5 I haven't seen the rsync maintainer recently either (CCed). Can

Re: [Fink-devel] "WARNING: Unable to parse ..." after upgrade

2003-11-16 Thread Don McKenzie Paul
Still a problem using the system version of rsync in 10.2.8. Perhaps that tells us something. Don [82-69-15-218:~] donpaul% which rsync /usr/bin/rsync [82-69-15-218:~] donpaul% funk /usr/bin/sudo /sw/bin/fink selfupdate rsync -az -v rsync://rjk.hr.eu.finkmirrors.net/finkinfo//TIMESTAMP /sw/fi

Re: [Fink-devel] "WARNING: Unable to parse ..." after upgrade

2003-11-16 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
> "Don" == Don McKenzie Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Don> [82-69-15-218:~] donpaul% which rsync Don> /sw/bin/rsync Yes, this does seem to be the culprit now. -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.stonehenge.com/merl

Re: [Fink-devel] "WARNING: Unable to parse ..." after upgrade

2003-11-16 Thread Don McKenzie Paul
for me 82-69-15-218:~] donpaul% find /sw -name 'xplanet*' /sw/fink/10.2/stable/main/finkinfo/x11/xplanet-0.95-2.info /sw/fink/10.2/stable/main/finkinfo/x11/xplanet-0.95-2.patch /sw/fink/10.2/unstable/main/finkinfo/x11/xplanet-1.0.1-2.info /sw/fink/10.2/unstable/main/finkinfo/x11/xplanet-1.0.1-2.pa

Re: [Fink-devel] "WARNING: Unable to parse ..." after upgrade

2003-11-16 Thread Don McKenzie Paul
At 18:12 + 16/11/03, Don McKenzie Paul wrote: Randal L. Schwartz wrote: "Martin" == Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Martin> None of the above: Already fixed, about a week ago. Define "already fixed". I just self-updated, and I'm still getting it. Weird. The only explanation I h

Re: [Fink-devel] "WARNING: Unable to parse ..." after upgrade

2003-11-16 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
> "Martin" == Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Martin> If you want to test this, you could move this remporarily out of the Martin> way so that /usr/bin/rsync is used and look if the selfupdate works Martin> differently then. Boom... VERY different. Deleted many things. No errors

Re: [Fink-devel] "WARNING: Unable to parse ..." after upgrade

2003-11-16 Thread Martin Costabel
Randal L. Schwartz wrote: [] % which rsync /sw/bin/rsync If you want to test this, you could move this remporarily out of the way so that /usr/bin/rsync is used and look if the selfupdate works differently then. Otherwise I will have to leave this problem to the rsync buffs (bbraun?), because t

Re: [Fink-devel] "WARNING: Unable to parse ..." after upgrade

2003-11-16 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
> "Martin" == Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Martin> This is getting funny. The files are definitely not on the server: Martin> costabel% rsync Martin> rsync://sfo.ca.us.finkmirrors.net/finkinfo/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/x11/xplanet\* Martin> -rw-r--r--1813 2003/11/08

Re: [Fink-devel] "WARNING: Unable to parse ..." after upgrade

2003-11-16 Thread Martin Costabel
Randal L. Schwartz wrote: [] -rw-r--r--1 merlyn unknown 1900 Oct 27 05:32 /sw/fink/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/x11/xplanet-0.95-12.info -rw-r--r--1 merlyn unknown 386 Oct 21 08:11 /sw/fink/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/x11/xplanet-0.95-12.patch -rw-r--r--1 merlyn unknow

Re: [Fink-devel] "WARNING: Unable to parse ..." after upgrade

2003-11-16 Thread Don McKenzie Paul
Randal L. Schwartz wrote: "Martin" == Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Martin> None of the above: Already fixed, about a week ago. Define "already fixed". I just self-updated, and I'm still getting it. Weird. The only explanation I have is that you are doing selfupdate-rsync with o

Re: [Fink-devel] "WARNING: Unable to parse ..." after upgrade

2003-11-16 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
> "Martin" == Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Martin> Hmm, then perhaps your /sw/fink/dists is not pointing to 10.3? lrwxr-xr-x1 merlyn unknown 4 Nov 15 09:25 /sw/fink/dists -> 10.3 Martin> Otherwise I don't understand how you can have xplanet-0.95-12 in Martin> uns

Re: [Fink-devel] "WARNING: Unable to parse ..." after upgrade

2003-11-16 Thread Martin Costabel
Randal L. Schwartz wrote: [] Here's /sw/etc/fink.conf: [] Trees: local/main stable/main stable/crypto local/bootstrap unstable/main unstab le/crypto [] Distribution: 10.3 [] SelfUpdateMethod: rsync And the rsync is definitely pulling 10.3/unstable. Here's the command: /usr/bin/su

Re: [Fink-devel] "WARNING: Unable to parse ..." after upgrade

2003-11-16 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
> "Martin" == Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Martin> Randal L. Schwartz wrote: >>> "Martin" == Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Martin> None of the above: Already fixed, about a week ago. >> Define "already fixed". I just self-updated, and I'm still getting >> it.

[Fink-devel] libnet

2003-11-16 Thread Gary Kerbaugh
Hi guys, I tried to update snort and it failed due to errors in checking for libnet.h. This was installed as a dependency so I've never kept track of it. I have the old version 1.0.2a from the libnet1.0 package. At the bottom of libnet.h are the lines: #if (!LIBNET_LIL_ENDIAN && !LIBNET_BIG_E

Re: [Fink-devel] "WARNING: Unable to parse ..." after upgrade

2003-11-16 Thread Martin Costabel
Randal L. Schwartz wrote: "Martin" == Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Martin> None of the above: Already fixed, about a week ago. Define "already fixed". I just self-updated, and I'm still getting it. Weird. The only explanation I have is that you are doing selfupdate-rsync with o

Re: [Fink-devel] "WARNING: Unable to parse ..." after upgrade

2003-11-16 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
> "Martin" == Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Martin> None of the above: Already fixed, about a week ago. Define "already fixed". I just self-updated, and I'm still getting it. -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ht

Re: [Fink-devel] "WARNING: Unable to parse ..." after upgrade

2003-11-16 Thread Martin Costabel
Randal L. Schwartz wrote: My fink self-upgraded recently, and now I'm getting these errors: [] Are these wanted, expected, known, fixable, hurting anything? None of the above: Already fixed, about a week ago. -- Martin --- This SF. Net email

[Fink-devel] "WARNING: Unable to parse ..." after upgrade

2003-11-16 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
My fink self-upgraded recently, and now I'm getting these errors: Reading package info... WARNING: Unable to parse the line "GCC 3.3" in "/sw/fink/dists/stable/main/finkinfo/games/grhino-0.7.0-11.info". WARNING: Unable to parse the line "Manually downloads and installs day and night

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: fink/t/PkgVersion get_perl.t,1.3,1.4

2003-11-16 Thread David R. Morrison
Let me jump in here, since it was my change that caused the trouble. First of all, the history of this code snippet is that I wrote it back in June to implement one aspect of the then-new "Type: perl 5.x.y" declaration. In the past month, a few changes were made to it (by other people): it was

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: fink/t/PkgVersion get_perl.t,1.3,1.4

2003-11-16 Thread Max Horn
Am Sonntag, 16.11.03 um 14:33 Uhr schrieb Michael G Schwern: On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 05:15:35AM -0800, Max Horn wrote: --- get_perl.t 15 Nov 2003 11:57:59 - 1.3 +++ get_perl.t 16 Nov 2003 13:15:33 - 1.4 @@ -16,7 +16,13 @@ isa_ok( $pv, 'Fink::PkgVersion' ); my($perldir, $perla

Re: [Fink-devel] Basic style guide (was Re: fink/perlmod/Fink Bootstrap.pm,1.40,1.41 Command.pm,1.3,1.4 Config.pm,1.25,1.26 Mirror.pm,1.10,1.11)

2003-11-16 Thread Max Horn
Am Sonntag, 16.11.03 um 14:23 Uhr schrieb Michael G Schwern: On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 07:44:11AM -0500, Benjamin Reed wrote: And thus starts a religious war... I'm really hoping to keep it sane. I think Ben's point was that there is absolutly no point in "arguing" about this. There are reasons for

[Fink-devel] Re: fink/t/PkgVersion get_perl.t,1.3,1.4

2003-11-16 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 05:15:35AM -0800, Max Horn wrote: > --- get_perl.t15 Nov 2003 11:57:59 - 1.3 > +++ get_perl.t16 Nov 2003 13:15:33 - 1.4 > @@ -16,7 +16,13 @@ > isa_ok( $pv, 'Fink::PkgVersion' ); > > my($perldir, $perlarch) = $pv->get_perl_dir_arch; > -#l

Re: [Fink-devel] Basic style guide (was Re: fink/perlmod/Fink Bootstrap.pm,1.40,1.41 Command.pm,1.3,1.4 Config.pm,1.25,1.26 Mirror.pm,1.10,1.11)

2003-11-16 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 07:44:11AM -0500, Benjamin Reed wrote: > And thus starts a religious war... I'm really hoping to keep it sane. So I've said why not tabs. Now you, why literal tabs? Any decent editor can toggle the behavior of the tab key between a literal tab and N spaces. And any decen

Re: [Fink-devel] get_perl_dir_arch() and "Type: perl" (was Re: fink/t/PkgVersion get_perl.t,1.2,1.3)

2003-11-16 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 01:53:34PM +0100, Max Horn wrote: > >You don't disable a failing test. You either fix the bug, fix the > >test or > >post a bug report and set TODO (see t/Command/failure.t for examples). > > So far that particular test failed twice for me when in fact everything > was w

Re: [Fink-devel] Basic style guide (was Re: fink/perlmod/Fink Bootstrap.pm,1.40,1.41 Command.pm,1.3,1.4 Config.pm,1.25,1.26 Mirror.pm,1.10,1.11)

2003-11-16 Thread Max Horn
Am Sonntag, 16.11.03 um 13:44 Uhr schrieb Benjamin Reed: [...] I agree that you should use spaces when you're doing columnar stuff, and in that case, if it were to be indented, you would do: foobar Exactly. Use tabs to indent statements, but don't use them inside statements. In all other case

Re: [Fink-devel] Basic style guide (was Re: fink/perlmod/Fink Bootstrap.pm,1.40,1.41 Command.pm,1.3,1.4 Config.pm,1.25,1.26 Mirror.pm,1.10,1.11)

2003-11-16 Thread Max Horn
Am Sonntag, 16.11.03 um 13:16 Uhr schrieb Michael G Schwern: On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 03:42:31AM -0800, Max Horn wrote: Modified Files: Bootstrap.pm Command.pm Config.pm Mirror.pm Log Message: fix whitespaces I'm not really sure what you "fixed" here aside from replacing perfectly fine fou

Re: [Fink-devel] get_perl_dir_arch() and "Type: perl" (was Re: fink/t/PkgVersion get_perl.t,1.2,1.3)

2003-11-16 Thread Max Horn
Am Sonntag, 16.11.03 um 13:34 Uhr schrieb Michael G Schwern: On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 03:58:01AM -0800, Max Horn wrote: disable not working test Tests are there to tell you something might be broken. If you just comment it out when it starts failing then the tests are worthless. The test was wor

Re: [Fink-devel] Basic style guide (was Re: fink/perlmod/Fink Bootstrap.pm,1.40,1.41 Command.pm,1.3,1.4 Config.pm,1.25,1.26 Mirror.pm,1.10,1.11)

2003-11-16 Thread Benjamin Reed
Michael G Schwern wrote: And thus starts a religious war... Don't use tabs when spaces will do. Tabs cause confusion. You don't know what people have their tab stops set to. Don't indent with them. You can't look and tell the difference between a tab and a space. Don't use them in code. I

[Fink-devel] get_perl_dir_arch() and "Type: perl" (was Re: fink/t/PkgVersion get_perl.t,1.2,1.3)

2003-11-16 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 03:58:01AM -0800, Max Horn wrote: > disable not working test Tests are there to tell you something might be broken. If you just comment it out when it starts failing then the tests are worthless. You don't disable a failing test. You either fix the bug, fix the test or p

[Fink-devel] Basic style guide (was Re: fink/perlmod/Fink Bootstrap.pm,1.40,1.41 Command.pm,1.3,1.4 Config.pm,1.25,1.26 Mirror.pm,1.10,1.11)

2003-11-16 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 03:42:31AM -0800, Max Horn wrote: > Modified Files: > Bootstrap.pm Command.pm Config.pm Mirror.pm > Log Message: > fix whitespaces I'm not really sure what you "fixed" here aside from replacing perfectly fine four space indentation with tabs. Also, it seems you're

Re: [Fink-devel] mv trailing slashes bug solved

2003-11-16 Thread Martin Costabel
Alexander Strange wrote: On Nov 16, 2003, at 2:24 AM, James Gibbs wrote: Martin Costabel suggested to me that a kext may be to blame for the mv trailing slashes bug. In my system preferences, the only "haxie" I have is Stuffit Archive Via Rename aka Stuffit AVR. It is part of Stuffit Deluxe 8.

Re: [Fink-devel] mv trailing slashes bug solved

2003-11-16 Thread Alexander Strange
On Nov 16, 2003, at 2:24 AM, James Gibbs wrote: Martin Costabel suggested to me that a kext may be to blame for the mv trailing slashes bug. In my system preferences, the only "haxie" I have is Stuffit Archive Via Rename aka Stuffit AVR. It is part of Stuffit Deluxe 8.0. It allows one to stuff

[Fink-devel] mv trailing slashes bug solved

2003-11-16 Thread James Gibbs
Martin Costabel suggested to me that a kext may be to blame for the mv trailing slashes bug. In my system preferences, the only "haxie" I have is Stuffit Archive Via Rename aka Stuffit AVR. It is part of Stuffit Deluxe 8.0. It allows one to stuff a file by adding .sit, .tar, .zip, etc. or unstu