( Perhaps better suited to the -devel list? )
Edelleenlähetetyn viestin alku:
Lähettäjä: Asko Kauppi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Päiväys: 7. huhtikuuta 2005 19:28:02 GMT+03:00
Vastaanottaja: Fink Users' List fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Aihe: [Fink-users] SDL SDL_Mixer performance
I'm using SDL
Thanks.
I will keep the three in the same .info since it makes maintaining the
source, MD5 fields etc. easier.
-ak
11.4.2005 kello 04:15, Martin Costabel kirjoitti:
Asko Kauppi wrote:
I have a prototype fink package, with the following subsections:
luax
luax-samples
luax-tests
Now
I have a prototype fink package, with the following subsections:
luax
luax-samples
luax-tests
Now, only the main 'luax' package needs actually to be compiled (only
it has binaries). So why is it, that if I do 'fink build luax-samples'
the somewhat time-taking compilation
Hi, all
I would have a question regarding versioning of packages, especially
concerning the Lua (www.lua.org) scripting language.
Current package in Fink is 5.0, by the name 'lua'. Latest stable
release is 5.0.2, which is compatible and causes no problems.
However, in the Lua tradition,
Trying to use a simple if-else in fink scripts; WHAT am I missing??
Sample scripts do have plenty of if's, what's so special with this:
if test `uname -r` \ 8.7.0; then
sh: -c: line 2: syntax error: unexpected end of file
### execution of if failed, exit code 2
...
# Note: the 10.4 readline
Jean-Louis's email address is [EMAIL PROTECTED] (two l's)
However, we are maintaining the package together, so I may pick up
the call, too. :)
Lua 5.1.1 is being reviewed by the Lua authorities, and that version
I can affect (not Lua 5.0, that is all Jean-Louis's).
New package splitting is
Sure did! :) Had read the manual, but... forgotten that part. Thanks.
Martin Costabel kirjoitti 3.7.2006 kello 15.57:
Asko Kauppi wrote:
Trying to use a simple if-else in fink scripts; WHAT am I missing??
Sample scripts do have plenty of if's, what's so special with this:
if test `uname
Description: Lua command for command line use (same as 'lua51')
Chris Zubrzycki kirjoitti 3.7.2006 kello 17.21:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jul 2, 2006, at 8:08 PM, Asko Kauppi wrote:
Jean-Louis's email address is [EMAIL PROTECTED] (two l's)
However, we
I have a package for Fink that is completely CPU ignorant; how should
I mark it such in the .info file?
Also, what is the generic approach taken towards PowerPC/Intel issue,
which now gets more concrete.
I found no notion at:
http://fink.sourceforge.net/doc/packaging/reference.php?
Wouldn't this be way too privacy-infringing?
I would personally draw the line to:
- don't send anything identifying the user (no email ids etc.)
- don't send anything about his/her environment (that would be
potentially identifying, too)
We all know there's plenty of privacy-concerned
What is the proper way to test whether a user is running OS X 10.3?
I've just noticed the test I had has not worked since 10.4.10, and
will either banish 10.3 support or need a fool proof test. Did not
find anything on net.
The current code is:
# if [ `uname -r` \ 8.7.0 ]; then
#gcc
Thanks for answers. I will be changing to using:
[ `/usr/bin/sw_vers -productVersion | cut -d'.' -f1-2` \ 10.4 ]
Asko Kauppi kirjoitti 22.2.2008 kello 10:23:
What is the proper way to test whether a user is running OS X 10.3?
I've just noticed the test I had has not worked since 10.4.10
I'm a fink package maintainer, who upgraded to Leopard this week.
Surprisingly, the support for 10.5.x from fink's side seems far from
ready. I don't know the reasons, but this is rather disturbing. To me,
fink is a method of delivering tools to people liking OS X and working
on the
K. Hansen kirjoitti 24.2.2008 kello 1:03:
On Saturday 23 February 2008 05:55:45 pm Asko Kauppi wrote:
I'm a fink package maintainer, who upgraded to Leopard this week.
Surprisingly, the support for 10.5.x from fink's side seems far from
ready. I don't know the reasons, but this is rather
opinion.
The end of installing LuaRocks would show something like:
***
*** Please run the following command to allow LuaRocks install binary
modules
***
*** sudo fink install lua51-dev
***
-asko
Jean-François Mertens kirjoitti 14.5.2008 kello 2:31:
On 13 May 2008, at 20:59, Asko Kauppi wrote
Just reporting a problem building freetype2-dev 2.1.4-12 on my
machine (PowerPC G4, 10.5.4, gcc 4.0.1 build 5465).
Can anyone repeat this (I'll try freetype219 in the mean time)...
Seems I'm not the first:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg15268.html
But there's no solution
Martin Costabel kirjoitti 3.7.2008 kello 23:24:
Asko Kauppi wrote:
Just reporting a problem building freetype2-dev 2.1.4-12 on my
machine (PowerPC G4, 10.5.4, gcc 4.0.1 build 5465).
Can anyone repeat this (I'll try freetype219 in the mean time)...
Seems I'm not the first:
http
I saw this discussed on fink-users and also here at fink-devel but
would like to re-bring it up.
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg28211.html
'pango.pc' is in the wrong place, and the supposed fix is to set
PKG_CONFIG_PATH to find it.
However, this also affects a
I need to find _any_ fink package (installed or not) that still has a
Depends: or BuildDepends: on package X.
How to do that?
fink list -t | cut -f2 | xargs fink dumpinfo -pN -fdepends -
fbuilddepends
...must be close, but starts asking about packages to install.. Why?
-asko
Sorry for the noise. Got this solved by adding #!/bin/sh -ex to the
PatchScript and preceding any $ with backslash.
ok now.
Edelleenlähetetty viesti alkaa:
Lähettäjä: Asko Kauppi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Päiväys: 28. syyskuuta 2008 klo 23:34.50
Vastaanottaja: fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
I've done this before, but for some reason it does not work with a
package I'm now tooling up. Why?
The idea is to create a custom Makefile for fink, embedded in
the .info file.
What I get is each line separately executed. What's wrong???
PatchScript:
cat Makefile.fink EOF
Running OS X 10.5 on PowerPC.
I needed to print via IPP to a HP Deskjet 3550. Presumably this
should be possible via hpijs driver, so I installed it via fink.
That did not work. No new drivers were added to OS X Printing
preferences. I did run the add command mentioned in usage
As maintainers of fink sigc++2 and cairomm1 packages you might be
interested about this:
a bug in OS X or libsigc++ (depends on how you want to see it) that
causes cairomm (among others?) not to compile.
-asko
Edelleenlähetetty viesti alkaa:
Lähettäjä: Asko Kauppi [EMAIL PROTECTED
Would the i386-linux-binutils enable cross compiling Linux i386 target
from OS X (using C/C++, not Pascal)?
https://sourceforge.net/tracker2/?func=detailaid=2146378group_id=17203atid=414256
-
This SF.Net email is
I've been wanting to get mingw-gcc to work, as well. Had problems
with mingw-binutils and I think the message never got to the list due
to a 40+KB log attached (probably served me right..?).
I think I never heard of Asari on this (mailed him twice). Maybe
someone should take over the
that this is preferable to emailing the maintainer directly, since
most fink package maintainers do not have access to all possible
hardware and software configurations.
Edelleenlähetetty viesti alkaa:
Lähettäjä: Asko Kauppi as...@dnainternet.net
Päiväys: 14. tammikuuta 2009 klo 0:17.32
Seems to solve it for me (tested on PPC). Please check it in. :)
THANKS!
And you might make a note that this package is without an active
maintainer?
-asko
Martin Costabel kirjoitti 13.1.2009 kello 23:38:
Asko Kauppi wrote:
[]
Does anyone else have this problem; does the package
27 matches
Mail list logo
