Dear Colleagues,
In a few sentences, a summary of my contribution addressing some of Pedro’s
formulations of Yixin's questions:
It is difficult to consider a unique perspective on the relations between
intelligence and information as they depend upon the agent being considered
(bacteria, human
On Information
Please allow me to respectfully disagree with many of you. The term
'information' can well be defined by stringent logical-mathematical methods.
It will, however, need agreement on the calssification of the kinds of
information.
In preparation to an answer to the questions formulat
An interesting message from Qiao Tian-qing
Note: attachments are not much welcome by the host server of this list.
--P.
Mensaje original
Asunto: I agree with you
Fecha: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 10:52:38 +0800
De: whhbs...@sina.com
Para: pcmarijuan.i...@aragon.es
D
"Information is the difference that makes the difference"
Dear colleagues,
It seems important to me to distinguish between two concepts of information
because if we use the same word for two concepts this can be a source of
confusion. Perhaps, I can reproduce the two character set in Ch
alf Of Igor Gurevich
Sent: den 20 december 2010 12:28
To: Pedro C. Marijuan
Cc: fis@listas.unizar.es
Subject: Re: [Fis] Closing Comments?
Dear Pedro C. Marijuan!
Dear Dear Colleagues!
DEFINITION OF CONCEPT “INFORMATION”
1) D. Doucette in work “Challenges for Those Constructing a Science of
Inform
Dear FIS colleagues,
Well, I am making a try on those tough questions...
Q1. What is the correct concept of intelligence?
It should refer to entities with capability to adjust (adapt) their
inner processes and configurations to their environment, either
following an autopoietic life cycle or in
Dear Pedro C. Marijuan!
Dear Dear Colleagues!
DEFINITION OF CONCEPT “INFORMATION”
1) D. Doucette in work “Challenges for Those Constructing a Science of
Information as an Evolving Unique Discipline” presented at Fourth
International Conference on the Foundations of Information Science:
Towards a
FIS Friends,
Like in most of our excursions, in the present one we have stumbled upon
a very interesting and exciting "attractor". Rather than throwing
ourselves into a deep discussion about the modes of social knowing and
their historical interrelationship my suggestion is that we sidestep
t
