Re: [Flashcoders] ScrollRect and masking
Well I will do as Glen suggested, the first option. In my custom class that implements an IModuleConteiner interface, I will add a get fixedHeight():Number function. Thanks everyone for the help On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Omar Fouad wrote: > What about extending movieClip and overriding the height property to return > the mask height > > On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 12:14 AM, Glen Pike wrote: > >> currentModule.myMask > > > ___ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Re: [Flashcoders] ScrollRect and masking
What about extending movieClip and overriding the height property to return the mask height On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 12:14 AM, Glen Pike wrote: > currentModule.myMask ___ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Re: [Flashcoders] ScrollRect and masking
You should possibly roll your own class which is the list + mask that
reports it's height and width as that of the mask.
Alternatively, if you are feeling lazy, make the mask a symbol & give it
an instance name in the IDE, or do it programmatically and access the
width / height of that in your calculations, e.g.
currentModule.x = (stage.stageWidth * 0.5) - (currentModule.myMask.width *0.5)
Omar Fouad wrote:
No one?
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Omar Fouad wrote:
Thanks for the reply. I'm already doing that, as the list loads its data
upon added to stage
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Ktu wrote:
you could try positioning it before you add the 'list' to the displayList
of
the container.
Ktu;
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Omar Fouad
wrote:
Hello,
I'm working on some project where I have a big container Sprite and
based
on
what I need, I add some ui inside of it. Once I add this ui, and I make
sure
that everything is there on its place, I align this container sprite to
fir
in the center of my stage:
private var currentModule:Sprite; // the container
private function updateScreen(e:MouseEvent):void {
if(currentModule) { // when I switch to another module
removeChild(currentModule);
currentModule = null; // clean it up
}
currentModule = new Sprite();
addChild(currentModule);
currentModule.addChild(children); //some children are added to
currentModule
currentModule.x = (stage.stageWidth * 0.5) - (currentModule.width *0.5)
//
aligns horizontally
currentModule.y = (stage.stageHeight * 0.5) - (currentModule.height
*0.5)
//
aligns horizontally
}
Now assume I add to the currentModule, a masked list. What I mean is a
container that contains 100 list items one below the other, and a mask
that
shows just 5 items and the mask's height is 100.
stage alignment doesn't work properly because the currentModule height
is
not just 100 px (as the mask's height) but it is actually the real
height
that the 100 list item are occupying and so, alignment fails.
I could use myMask.height, but I need to align the whole currentModule
as I
use it as a wrapper to wrap some components under the same hood.
What should I do? I tried tracing the mc's height after using
scrollRect,
as
people said that it would return only the visible part's height but it
didn't happen. I traced and the same number is there as if nothing were
masked.
Any Ideas?
Thanks in advance
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Re: [Flashcoders] ScrollRect and masking
No one?
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Omar Fouad wrote:
> Thanks for the reply. I'm already doing that, as the list loads its data
> upon added to stage
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Ktu wrote:
>
>> you could try positioning it before you add the 'list' to the displayList
>> of
>> the container.
>>
>> Ktu;
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Omar Fouad
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > I'm working on some project where I have a big container Sprite and
>> based
>> > on
>> > what I need, I add some ui inside of it. Once I add this ui, and I make
>> > sure
>> > that everything is there on its place, I align this container sprite to
>> fir
>> > in the center of my stage:
>> >
>> > private var currentModule:Sprite; // the container
>> >
>> > private function updateScreen(e:MouseEvent):void {
>> > if(currentModule) { // when I switch to another module
>> > removeChild(currentModule);
>> > currentModule = null; // clean it up
>> > }
>> >
>> > currentModule = new Sprite();
>> > addChild(currentModule);
>> > currentModule.addChild(children); //some children are added to
>> > currentModule
>> > currentModule.x = (stage.stageWidth * 0.5) - (currentModule.width *0.5)
>> //
>> > aligns horizontally
>> > currentModule.y = (stage.stageHeight * 0.5) - (currentModule.height
>> *0.5)
>> > //
>> > aligns horizontally
>> > }
>> >
>> > Now assume I add to the currentModule, a masked list. What I mean is a
>> > container that contains 100 list items one below the other, and a mask
>> that
>> > shows just 5 items and the mask's height is 100.
>> > stage alignment doesn't work properly because the currentModule height
>> is
>> > not just 100 px (as the mask's height) but it is actually the real
>> height
>> > that the 100 list item are occupying and so, alignment fails.
>> >
>> > I could use myMask.height, but I need to align the whole currentModule
>> as I
>> > use it as a wrapper to wrap some components under the same hood.
>> > What should I do? I tried tracing the mc's height after using
>> scrollRect,
>> > as
>> > people said that it would return only the visible part's height but it
>> > didn't happen. I traced and the same number is there as if nothing were
>> > masked.
>> > Any Ideas?
>> >
>> > Thanks in advance
>> > ___
>> > Flashcoders mailing list
>> > Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
>> > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
>> >
>> ___
>> Flashcoders mailing list
>> Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
>> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
>>
>
>
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Re: [Flashcoders] ScrollRect and masking
Thanks for the reply. I'm already doing that, as the list loads its data
upon added to stage
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Ktu wrote:
> you could try positioning it before you add the 'list' to the displayList
> of
> the container.
>
> Ktu;
>
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Omar Fouad
> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm working on some project where I have a big container Sprite and based
> > on
> > what I need, I add some ui inside of it. Once I add this ui, and I make
> > sure
> > that everything is there on its place, I align this container sprite to
> fir
> > in the center of my stage:
> >
> > private var currentModule:Sprite; // the container
> >
> > private function updateScreen(e:MouseEvent):void {
> > if(currentModule) { // when I switch to another module
> > removeChild(currentModule);
> > currentModule = null; // clean it up
> > }
> >
> > currentModule = new Sprite();
> > addChild(currentModule);
> > currentModule.addChild(children); //some children are added to
> > currentModule
> > currentModule.x = (stage.stageWidth * 0.5) - (currentModule.width *0.5)
> //
> > aligns horizontally
> > currentModule.y = (stage.stageHeight * 0.5) - (currentModule.height *0.5)
> > //
> > aligns horizontally
> > }
> >
> > Now assume I add to the currentModule, a masked list. What I mean is a
> > container that contains 100 list items one below the other, and a mask
> that
> > shows just 5 items and the mask's height is 100.
> > stage alignment doesn't work properly because the currentModule height is
> > not just 100 px (as the mask's height) but it is actually the real height
> > that the 100 list item are occupying and so, alignment fails.
> >
> > I could use myMask.height, but I need to align the whole currentModule as
> I
> > use it as a wrapper to wrap some components under the same hood.
> > What should I do? I tried tracing the mc's height after using scrollRect,
> > as
> > people said that it would return only the visible part's height but it
> > didn't happen. I traced and the same number is there as if nothing were
> > masked.
> > Any Ideas?
> >
> > Thanks in advance
> > ___
> > Flashcoders mailing list
> > Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
> > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
> >
> ___
> Flashcoders mailing list
> Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
>
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Re: [Flashcoders] ScrollRect and masking
you could try positioning it before you add the 'list' to the displayList of
the container.
Ktu;
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Omar Fouad wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm working on some project where I have a big container Sprite and based
> on
> what I need, I add some ui inside of it. Once I add this ui, and I make
> sure
> that everything is there on its place, I align this container sprite to fir
> in the center of my stage:
>
> private var currentModule:Sprite; // the container
>
> private function updateScreen(e:MouseEvent):void {
> if(currentModule) { // when I switch to another module
> removeChild(currentModule);
> currentModule = null; // clean it up
> }
>
> currentModule = new Sprite();
> addChild(currentModule);
> currentModule.addChild(children); //some children are added to
> currentModule
> currentModule.x = (stage.stageWidth * 0.5) - (currentModule.width *0.5) //
> aligns horizontally
> currentModule.y = (stage.stageHeight * 0.5) - (currentModule.height *0.5)
> //
> aligns horizontally
> }
>
> Now assume I add to the currentModule, a masked list. What I mean is a
> container that contains 100 list items one below the other, and a mask that
> shows just 5 items and the mask's height is 100.
> stage alignment doesn't work properly because the currentModule height is
> not just 100 px (as the mask's height) but it is actually the real height
> that the 100 list item are occupying and so, alignment fails.
>
> I could use myMask.height, but I need to align the whole currentModule as I
> use it as a wrapper to wrap some components under the same hood.
> What should I do? I tried tracing the mc's height after using scrollRect,
> as
> people said that it would return only the visible part's height but it
> didn't happen. I traced and the same number is there as if nothing were
> masked.
> Any Ideas?
>
> Thanks in advance
> ___
> Flashcoders mailing list
> Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
>
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Re: [FlashCoders] scrollRect
Actually, I don't know. I'm sure there are tons of raster methods since I've seen Andre Michelle use them, and my PNG's alpha channels are intact. - Original Message - From: "Dimitrios Bendilas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Flashcoders mailing list" Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2006 4:28 AM Subject: Re: [FlashCoders] scrollRect Hello Jester, I apologize for taking S long to reply. Thank you very much for the information you provided! When I was asking you "how you handle alpha" I meant alpha values. Like when having a few movieclips on top of another, with _alpha = 40 or any value<100. Can you do that with BitmapData? (sorry if this is a very basic question, I didn't have the chance to work with bitmaps a lot yet). I think I'll see how performance goes and maybe I'll bother you and the list again if I need to start digging more into your approach. Thanks a lot. Regards, Dimitrios - Original Message - From: "JesterXL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Flashcoders mailing list" Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 5:11 PM Subject: Re: [FlashCoders] scrollRect > BitmapSprites extend Bitmap. Bitmap is an internal class, and extends > DisplayObject. DisplayObjects' have a drawing index, just like MovieClips > do. So, instead of swapDepths, you'd use setChildIndex. > > Now, for individual bitmaps that you are drawing, addToBitmapSprite, they > are added to the internal array, and drawn in that order. It would be > probably 10 minutes to add that method and call redraw to allow bitmaps to > change depth. > > ...or you could do it; I can give you Suversion access to the source if > you > wish. > > Alpha is handled by your bitmap. Bitmaps support alpha channels, so > whatever bitmap you added should have the alpha. In my case, the moving > sprites example uses a circular PNG, and since PNG's have alpha channels, > Flash draws the circle correctly on top of other circles. > > MovieClip's have gotten more powerful in Flash Player 8.5, yes, mainly > because of the DisplayList which seperates a MovieClip from existing from > actually being rendered/drawn each frame. It is not, however, > re-inventing > the wheel. We have not been able to blit in the Flash Player until > version > 8; instead, we've had to duplicate a tile 100 times vs. drawing onto 1 > bitmap. > > Great example of why blitting is so powerful and scaleable: > http://www.gskinner.com/blog/archives/2005/08/flash_8_thought.html > > Significantly less process, less RAM, and scales to infinite bitmaps. > > I have no benchmarks nor numbers other than creating 100 MovieClips in > Flash > 8 used 99%CPU, and 60 megs of RAM, and the framerate sucked. Changing > those > 100 MovieClips to be 1 bitmap, and scrolled via a copyPixels from a > double-buffering used 6% CPU and full framerate. That's what made me > write > Diesel. > > When you start adding BitmapSprites, you are adding overhead however > because > they themselves are DisplayObjects, like MovieClips, only they are drawn > into 1 bitmap vs. 30 of them drawn in 30 places in the DisplayList. > > The hybrid approach is to use 1 Bitmap, load all of your tiles and draw to > just 1. You're actual monsters and characters that move, make Sprites (or > MovieClips), and remove them from the DisplayList if they are not > on-screen. > Use scrollRect for the area you are scrolling, and use double-buffering > (copyPixels from a rectangle from an off-screen bitmap). > > This doesn't scale well because Sprites have more overhead, and moving > them > is sometimes more expensive then copyPixels, but it works well enough in > the > alpha, so I'm sure beta, and release it'll still be smokin'. > > > - Original Message - > From: "Dimitrios Bendilas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Flashcoders mailing list" > Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 6:36 AM > Subject: Re: [FlashCoders] scrollRect > > > Hi Jester, > > Thanks for the url. It seems very interesting. > There is one thing that bothers me, aside the fact that > I'would have to re-write a lot of stuff from scratch, if I > used a model like this. > > How do you know in what depth to draw everything? > How do you handle _alphas? > > The movieclip model provides a very easy way to stack > images one above another with no problems. It just seems > a lot of work, it's like re-inveting the wheel. > > How much can performance benefit from an approach > like this? Any benchmarks, numbers? > > Is there a hybrid approach maybe? One that requires > less code but increases performance? > > Thanks! > &g
Re: [FlashCoders] scrollRect
Hello Jester,
I apologize for taking S long to reply.
Thank you very much for the information you provided!
When I was asking you "how you handle alpha" I meant alpha values.
Like when having a few movieclips on top of another, with _alpha = 40 or any
value<100.
Can you do that with BitmapData? (sorry if this is a very basic question, I
didn't have the chance to work with bitmaps a lot yet).
I think I'll see how performance goes and maybe I'll bother you and the list
again if I need to start digging more into your approach.
Thanks a lot.
Regards,
Dimitrios
- Original Message -
From: "JesterXL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Flashcoders mailing list"
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 5:11 PM
Subject: Re: [FlashCoders] scrollRect
BitmapSprites extend Bitmap. Bitmap is an internal class, and extends
DisplayObject. DisplayObjects' have a drawing index, just like MovieClips
do. So, instead of swapDepths, you'd use setChildIndex.
Now, for individual bitmaps that you are drawing, addToBitmapSprite, they
are added to the internal array, and drawn in that order. It would be
probably 10 minutes to add that method and call redraw to allow bitmaps to
change depth.
...or you could do it; I can give you Suversion access to the source if
you
wish.
Alpha is handled by your bitmap. Bitmaps support alpha channels, so
whatever bitmap you added should have the alpha. In my case, the moving
sprites example uses a circular PNG, and since PNG's have alpha channels,
Flash draws the circle correctly on top of other circles.
MovieClip's have gotten more powerful in Flash Player 8.5, yes, mainly
because of the DisplayList which seperates a MovieClip from existing from
actually being rendered/drawn each frame. It is not, however,
re-inventing
the wheel. We have not been able to blit in the Flash Player until
version
8; instead, we've had to duplicate a tile 100 times vs. drawing onto 1
bitmap.
Great example of why blitting is so powerful and scaleable:
http://www.gskinner.com/blog/archives/2005/08/flash_8_thought.html
Significantly less process, less RAM, and scales to infinite bitmaps.
I have no benchmarks nor numbers other than creating 100 MovieClips in
Flash
8 used 99%CPU, and 60 megs of RAM, and the framerate sucked. Changing
those
100 MovieClips to be 1 bitmap, and scrolled via a copyPixels from a
double-buffering used 6% CPU and full framerate. That's what made me
write
Diesel.
When you start adding BitmapSprites, you are adding overhead however
because
they themselves are DisplayObjects, like MovieClips, only they are drawn
into 1 bitmap vs. 30 of them drawn in 30 places in the DisplayList.
The hybrid approach is to use 1 Bitmap, load all of your tiles and draw to
just 1. You're actual monsters and characters that move, make Sprites (or
MovieClips), and remove them from the DisplayList if they are not
on-screen.
Use scrollRect for the area you are scrolling, and use double-buffering
(copyPixels from a rectangle from an off-screen bitmap).
This doesn't scale well because Sprites have more overhead, and moving
them
is sometimes more expensive then copyPixels, but it works well enough in
the
alpha, so I'm sure beta, and release it'll still be smokin'.
- Original Message -
From: "Dimitrios Bendilas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Flashcoders mailing list"
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 6:36 AM
Subject: Re: [FlashCoders] scrollRect
Hi Jester,
Thanks for the url. It seems very interesting.
There is one thing that bothers me, aside the fact that
I'would have to re-write a lot of stuff from scratch, if I
used a model like this.
How do you know in what depth to draw everything?
How do you handle _alphas?
The movieclip model provides a very easy way to stack
images one above another with no problems. It just seems
a lot of work, it's like re-inveting the wheel.
How much can performance benefit from an approach
like this? Any benchmarks, numbers?
Is there a hybrid approach maybe? One that requires
less code but increases performance?
Thanks!
Dimitrios
- Original Message -----
From: "JesterXL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Flashcoders mailing list"
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 3:53 AM
Subject: Re: [FlashCoders] scrollRect
I oringally wrote this in Flash 8, and ported to Flash 8.5. There is no
reason it couldn't go back.
http://www.jessewarden.com/archives/2006/01/diesel_battlefi.html
- Original Message -
From: "Dimitrios Bendilas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 4:55 PM
Subject: [FlashCoders] scrollRect
Hi all,
I'm trying to make a very basic prototype to test parallax movement with
Flash 8.
Is movieclip.scrollRect what I should be using? I tried this:
var bg:MovieClip = _root.attachMovie("bg", "
Re: [FlashCoders] scrollRect
BitmapSprites extend Bitmap. Bitmap is an internal class, and extends
DisplayObject. DisplayObjects' have a drawing index, just like MovieClips
do. So, instead of swapDepths, you'd use setChildIndex.
Now, for individual bitmaps that you are drawing, addToBitmapSprite, they
are added to the internal array, and drawn in that order. It would be
probably 10 minutes to add that method and call redraw to allow bitmaps to
change depth.
...or you could do it; I can give you Suversion access to the source if you
wish.
Alpha is handled by your bitmap. Bitmaps support alpha channels, so
whatever bitmap you added should have the alpha. In my case, the moving
sprites example uses a circular PNG, and since PNG's have alpha channels,
Flash draws the circle correctly on top of other circles.
MovieClip's have gotten more powerful in Flash Player 8.5, yes, mainly
because of the DisplayList which seperates a MovieClip from existing from
actually being rendered/drawn each frame. It is not, however, re-inventing
the wheel. We have not been able to blit in the Flash Player until version
8; instead, we've had to duplicate a tile 100 times vs. drawing onto 1
bitmap.
Great example of why blitting is so powerful and scaleable:
http://www.gskinner.com/blog/archives/2005/08/flash_8_thought.html
Significantly less process, less RAM, and scales to infinite bitmaps.
I have no benchmarks nor numbers other than creating 100 MovieClips in Flash
8 used 99%CPU, and 60 megs of RAM, and the framerate sucked. Changing those
100 MovieClips to be 1 bitmap, and scrolled via a copyPixels from a
double-buffering used 6% CPU and full framerate. That's what made me write
Diesel.
When you start adding BitmapSprites, you are adding overhead however because
they themselves are DisplayObjects, like MovieClips, only they are drawn
into 1 bitmap vs. 30 of them drawn in 30 places in the DisplayList.
The hybrid approach is to use 1 Bitmap, load all of your tiles and draw to
just 1. You're actual monsters and characters that move, make Sprites (or
MovieClips), and remove them from the DisplayList if they are not on-screen.
Use scrollRect for the area you are scrolling, and use double-buffering
(copyPixels from a rectangle from an off-screen bitmap).
This doesn't scale well because Sprites have more overhead, and moving them
is sometimes more expensive then copyPixels, but it works well enough in the
alpha, so I'm sure beta, and release it'll still be smokin'.
- Original Message -
From: "Dimitrios Bendilas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Flashcoders mailing list"
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 6:36 AM
Subject: Re: [FlashCoders] scrollRect
Hi Jester,
Thanks for the url. It seems very interesting.
There is one thing that bothers me, aside the fact that
I'would have to re-write a lot of stuff from scratch, if I
used a model like this.
How do you know in what depth to draw everything?
How do you handle _alphas?
The movieclip model provides a very easy way to stack
images one above another with no problems. It just seems
a lot of work, it's like re-inveting the wheel.
How much can performance benefit from an approach
like this? Any benchmarks, numbers?
Is there a hybrid approach maybe? One that requires
less code but increases performance?
Thanks!
Dimitrios
- Original Message -
From: "JesterXL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Flashcoders mailing list"
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 3:53 AM
Subject: Re: [FlashCoders] scrollRect
>I oringally wrote this in Flash 8, and ported to Flash 8.5. There is no
> reason it couldn't go back.
>
> http://www.jessewarden.com/archives/2006/01/diesel_battlefi.html
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Dimitrios Bendilas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 4:55 PM
> Subject: [FlashCoders] scrollRect
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to make a very basic prototype to test parallax movement with
> Flash 8.
>
> Is movieclip.scrollRect what I should be using? I tried this:
>
> var bg:MovieClip = _root.attachMovie("bg", "bg", 2);
> var y:Number = 0;
> _root.onEnterFrame = function():Void {
> bg.scrollRect = {x:0, y:y--, width:635, height:540};
> }
>
> The movieclip "bg" contains only a jpg 635x540.
> The movement is pretty jumpy. Should I be using BitmapData instead?
>
> I'm a bit lost! I've been searching for code samples online for the past 2
> hours and
> I haven't found anything useful.
>
> Does anyone have a useful link for parallax or tile-based games using
> Flash
> 8 features?
> Performance is the key issue here, since this is going for a very big and
> complex game
> and I want to optimize it as much as possible.
>
> Thanks a
Re: [FlashCoders] scrollRect
Hi Jester,
Thanks for the url. It seems very interesting.
There is one thing that bothers me, aside the fact that
I'would have to re-write a lot of stuff from scratch, if I
used a model like this.
How do you know in what depth to draw everything?
How do you handle _alphas?
The movieclip model provides a very easy way to stack
images one above another with no problems. It just seems
a lot of work, it's like re-inveting the wheel.
How much can performance benefit from an approach
like this? Any benchmarks, numbers?
Is there a hybrid approach maybe? One that requires
less code but increases performance?
Thanks!
Dimitrios
- Original Message -
From: "JesterXL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Flashcoders mailing list"
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 3:53 AM
Subject: Re: [FlashCoders] scrollRect
I oringally wrote this in Flash 8, and ported to Flash 8.5. There is no
reason it couldn't go back.
http://www.jessewarden.com/archives/2006/01/diesel_battlefi.html
- Original Message -
From: "Dimitrios Bendilas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 4:55 PM
Subject: [FlashCoders] scrollRect
Hi all,
I'm trying to make a very basic prototype to test parallax movement with
Flash 8.
Is movieclip.scrollRect what I should be using? I tried this:
var bg:MovieClip = _root.attachMovie("bg", "bg", 2);
var y:Number = 0;
_root.onEnterFrame = function():Void {
bg.scrollRect = {x:0, y:y--, width:635, height:540};
}
The movieclip "bg" contains only a jpg 635x540.
The movement is pretty jumpy. Should I be using BitmapData instead?
I'm a bit lost! I've been searching for code samples online for the past 2
hours and
I haven't found anything useful.
Does anyone have a useful link for parallax or tile-based games using
Flash
8 features?
Performance is the key issue here, since this is going for a very big and
complex game
and I want to optimize it as much as possible.
Thanks a lot!
Dimitrios
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com
Re: [FlashCoders] scrollRect
Ah, the joy of alpha software... sorry about that.
:: goes to fix ::
Remind me to do this again when Flex 2 is released. There is a bug with
flash.display.Loader, and Adobe is already aware of it (Tile Loader will
load every other image). Additionally, the html-template is not included
(Subversion is being a bitch), so when you get the error in Flex Builder 2,
just right click on the error and "Rebuild html-template...".
Other than that, she actually works a tad faster and uses less RAM with the
beta.
http://dev.jessewarden.com/flash/diesel/jxl_diesel_battlefield_beta1.zip
http://diesel.avlux.net/svn/
u: public
p: public
- Original Message -
From: "Sascha Balkau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Flashcoders mailing list"
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 10:26 PM
Subject: Re: [FlashCoders] scrollRect
JesterXL,
I'd be interested in see this engine running but the demos on your site seem
not to work anymore with the latest Flash 8.5 alpha player.
If I import the project into Flex Builder and try to run it , it tells me
that some errors exist but it doesn't show me where the errors are.
Would be cool to get a hint on this to compile it with the latest Flex beta
to make it run.
Thanks,
Sascha
>I oringally wrote this in Flash 8, and ported to Flash 8.5. There is no
> reason it couldn't go back.
>
> http://www.jessewarden.com/archives/2006/01/diesel_battlefi.html
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Dimitrios Bendilas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 4:55 PM
> Subject: [FlashCoders] scrollRect
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to make a very basic prototype to test parallax movement with
> Flash 8.
>
> Is movieclip.scrollRect what I should be using? I tried this:
>
> var bg:MovieClip = _root.attachMovie("bg", "bg", 2);
> var y:Number = 0;
> _root.onEnterFrame = function():Void {
> bg.scrollRect = {x:0, y:y--, width:635, height:540};
> }
>
> The movieclip "bg" contains only a jpg 635x540.
> The movement is pretty jumpy. Should I be using BitmapData instead?
>
> I'm a bit lost! I've been searching for code samples online for the past 2
> hours and
> I haven't found anything useful.
>
> Does anyone have a useful link for parallax or tile-based games using
> Flash
> 8 features?
> Performance is the key issue here, since this is going for a very big and
> complex game
> and I want to optimize it as much as possible.
>
> Thanks a lot!
>
> Dimitrios
> ___
> Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
> To change your subscription options or search the archive:
> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
>
> Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
> Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
> http://www.figleaf.com
> http://training.figleaf.com
>
> ___
> Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
> To change your subscription options or search the archive:
> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
>
> Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
> Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
> http://www.figleaf.com
> http://training.figleaf.com
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com
Re: [FlashCoders] scrollRect
JesterXL,
I'd be interested in see this engine running but the demos on your site seem
not to work anymore with the latest Flash 8.5 alpha player.
If I import the project into Flex Builder and try to run it , it tells me
that some errors exist but it doesn't show me where the errors are.
Would be cool to get a hint on this to compile it with the latest Flex beta
to make it run.
Thanks,
Sascha
I oringally wrote this in Flash 8, and ported to Flash 8.5. There is no
reason it couldn't go back.
http://www.jessewarden.com/archives/2006/01/diesel_battlefi.html
- Original Message -
From: "Dimitrios Bendilas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 4:55 PM
Subject: [FlashCoders] scrollRect
Hi all,
I'm trying to make a very basic prototype to test parallax movement with
Flash 8.
Is movieclip.scrollRect what I should be using? I tried this:
var bg:MovieClip = _root.attachMovie("bg", "bg", 2);
var y:Number = 0;
_root.onEnterFrame = function():Void {
bg.scrollRect = {x:0, y:y--, width:635, height:540};
}
The movieclip "bg" contains only a jpg 635x540.
The movement is pretty jumpy. Should I be using BitmapData instead?
I'm a bit lost! I've been searching for code samples online for the past 2
hours and
I haven't found anything useful.
Does anyone have a useful link for parallax or tile-based games using
Flash
8 features?
Performance is the key issue here, since this is going for a very big and
complex game
and I want to optimize it as much as possible.
Thanks a lot!
Dimitrios
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com
Re: [FlashCoders] scrollRect
I oringally wrote this in Flash 8, and ported to Flash 8.5. There is no
reason it couldn't go back.
http://www.jessewarden.com/archives/2006/01/diesel_battlefi.html
- Original Message -
From: "Dimitrios Bendilas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 4:55 PM
Subject: [FlashCoders] scrollRect
Hi all,
I'm trying to make a very basic prototype to test parallax movement with
Flash 8.
Is movieclip.scrollRect what I should be using? I tried this:
var bg:MovieClip = _root.attachMovie("bg", "bg", 2);
var y:Number = 0;
_root.onEnterFrame = function():Void {
bg.scrollRect = {x:0, y:y--, width:635, height:540};
}
The movieclip "bg" contains only a jpg 635x540.
The movement is pretty jumpy. Should I be using BitmapData instead?
I'm a bit lost! I've been searching for code samples online for the past 2
hours and
I haven't found anything useful.
Does anyone have a useful link for parallax or tile-based games using Flash
8 features?
Performance is the key issue here, since this is going for a very big and
complex game
and I want to optimize it as much as possible.
Thanks a lot!
Dimitrios
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com
RE: [FlashCoders] scrollRect
You want to use bitmap caching in combination with scrollRect.
Use movieclip.cacheAsBitmap = true
Also any bitmaps you use should be smoothed. So make sure your jpg is
set to allow smoothing in the library. If you are dynamically loading
jpg's read this. If not read it anyway :)
http://www.kaourantin.net/2005/12/dynamically-loading-bitmaps-with.html
Good Luck.
-Thomas
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Dimitrios Bendilas
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 1:55 PM
To: flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
Subject: [FlashCoders] scrollRect
Hi all,
I'm trying to make a very basic prototype to test parallax movement with
Flash 8.
Is movieclip.scrollRect what I should be using? I tried this:
var bg:MovieClip = _root.attachMovie("bg", "bg", 2); var y:Number = 0;
_root.onEnterFrame = function():Void { bg.scrollRect = {x:0, y:y--,
width:635, height:540}; }
The movieclip "bg" contains only a jpg 635x540.
The movement is pretty jumpy. Should I be using BitmapData instead?
I'm a bit lost! I've been searching for code samples online for the past
2 hours and I haven't found anything useful.
Does anyone have a useful link for parallax or tile-based games using
Flash 8 features?
Performance is the key issue here, since this is going for a very big
and complex game and I want to optimize it as much as possible.
Thanks a lot!
Dimitrios
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com
