Bom dia. Oi.
For me, this was an informative and interesting review. I am very seriously
considering the purchase of an SDR-1000. In preparation, I have upgraded my
computer, purchased the Delta44 and Eric's ground isolation kit. The only
thing that has prevented me from purchasing one to
Here's the post that I plan to put on Eham
I’ve had my SDR1000
since the beginning of the year. It is my 3,018 radio-yes I’ve owned over 3000
rigs during 45 plus years of hamming. The only rig I’ve not used is the Yaesu
FT9000.
In the beginning,
pre-Delta 44 sound card, I had to deal
Hello Tim,
I'm confident that the hardware issues related to the Eham review are
the exception and not the rule. Remember, many early purchasers of the
SDR-1000 assembled their radios in sections, probably purchasing the
board stack first, with the remainder to follow. That leaves a lot of
Well, let’s look at the complaints.
“RF suppression is inadequate. The SDR has little to
NO RF shielding. This means if you run an external
amplifier...GOOD LUCK! If you run the internal 100W PA...
you will need some luck as well. This radio was
originally designed as a QRP 1 watt
Hi all,
First, the D44 interface kit works a charm. Nice
advantage other than getting rid of the rats nest of cables is that
thegood old Radio Shack audio cables seat much better in the SDR's
connectors than do those from Hosa, which are prone to falling out. Thanks to
all for putting this
At 08:34 AM 10/6/2005, Gerald Youngblood wrote:
Hi Tim,
I am afraid I must chime in on this topic because of some misperceptions
that may arise from the exam review.
One thing that has been different about this radio is that the
purchaser of serial number uno over two years ago has had the
Frank wrote:
KD5NWA wrote:
Lip anyone? :-P
Don't I wish.
All you need to be convinced is to see the edifice that Bill Schottaedt
of CCRMA has built around CLM, CMN, and snd to see the value of that
kind of programming environment. His stuff works across all the current
Lisps. He
The software is currently locked to 48KHz. We will open this up
eventually to allow higher (and perhaps lower?) rates.
Eric Wachsmann
FlexRadio Systems
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
radio.biz] On Behalf Of richard allen
Sent: Thursday, October
I have grounded all of the points on my interface card, and it works great
on my Dell computer. My external mike connection provides great audio, and
when I connect the mike input to the speaker output of my Dell Computer, I
have been able to work the digital modes with MixW and other software
I have an SDR-1000 on order and haven't yet purchased a suitable sound
card. Since I want to use it with a laptop computer, I was thinking of
buying the Extigy, but Gerald mentioned at the TAPR DCC that there was a
soundcard with a firewire interface that might be suitable. Which card
is this
This problem was fixed by removing and
re-installing 1.4.5 - I assume some file or maybe DB was corrupted.
I have it working ok now.
Mel, K0PFX
- Original Message -
From: Mel Whitten
To: FlexRadio
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 11:46 PM
Subject: [Flexradio] 1.4.5 Old keyer "keys"
t the risk of over beating a dead horse, I've got get this off my chest. I'm
sorry Chris had some issues, hopefully they will be resolved through the proper
channels. It certainly looks like Gerald is trying on his end.
But you know..what amazes me about Eham Reviews, is the disparity
To be clear, we are moving away from the old
keyer.
As soon as we have an alternative to the existing memory and keyboard
buffer options (which will likely come in the form of 3rd party
applications), we will be dropping the old keyer
completely. I would believe that there
is an
Looking to see if anyone has been able to program other buttons on the shuttle
pro. Or...can you point me to where I can find the keystrokes required for
turning on or off functions other than what is on the keyboard screen of the
powerSDR console?
Thanks
Greg
AB7R
Greg,
Take a look at www.flex-radio.com/keymap.xls
Eric Wachsmann
FlexRadio Systems
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
radio.biz] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 4:46 PM
To: FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz;
Joe
Thanks, we all enjoyed producing it!
Actually perhaps we could reform the breakout box as an enclosure
for the D-44 kit. Ill give give away a free d-44 interface to anyone who
comes up with an enclosure method which does not need a machine
shop to create!
Thanks again
Eric
At 12:08 PM 10/6/2005, Robert McGwier wrote:
ALL of my three SDR-1000's are Mark I radios and they all have all of the
ECO's.
Bob
N4HY
I have not observed this. Note: by applying the Engineering
Change Orders and updating the software, you have the latest
version of the transceiver.
Bill
This was the last message on the topic that I read. Kill the horse, since
you hit on the MOST important of all facts which make this radio different
than others, in your last paragraph. The many comments about the 'review'
hit on many aspects which make it a great radio but still not unique.
At 01:31 PM 10/6/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 07:40 AM 10/6/2005, Dale Boresz wrote:
I have often advocated that, someday, we minimize/get rid of this
altogether with some sort of true USB interface to a small microprocessor,
possibly sending in the I and Q stream as integers or IEEE
At 06:26 PM 10/6/2005, ecellison wrote:
Bill
This was the last message on the topic that I read. Kill the horse,
since
you hit on the MOST important of all facts which make this radio
different
than others, in your last paragraph. The many comments about the
'review'
hit on many aspects which
... Or some variation of that sentiment is the persistent
theme that I see those who have already joined the Flex Radio
SDR-1000 owner's party express. Many of the eHam reviews say
it; I've also seen it posted both here and on the Forum area
numerous times as well. I also heard it several times at
21 matches
Mail list logo
