Re: ..OT: [Flightgear-devel] Recording NMEA data playing back ?

2004-07-16 Thread Martin Spott
Arnt Karlsen wrote: On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 16:37:14 + (UTC), Martin wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: P.S.: For my dimploma 'thesis' I built a 2D-filter for thermal ..url? Sorry, this was 'closed source' development at a local company, Martin. -- Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just

RE: [Flightgear-devel] Spitfire

2004-07-16 Thread Vivian Meazza
I wrote Sent: 15 July 2004 22:16 To: 'FlightGear developers discussions' Subject: RE: [Flightgear-devel] Spitfire I wrote Sent: 09 July 2004 09:53 To: 'FlightGear developers discussions' Subject: RE: [Flightgear-devel] Spitfire David Megginson wrote Sent: 09 July 2004

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Spitfire

2004-07-16 Thread Erik Hofman
Vivian Meazza wrote: Back up with an upgraded machine - 2.8 Mhz P4, 512 Ram, Gforce 5200. I've rebuilt Cywin, and FGFS-CVS. I've just copied the latest version of the Spitfire from FGFS-0.9.4, where it was working, after a fashion, to FGFS-CVS. All the files. Now it won't fly, as David pointed

Re: [Flightgear-devel] How FlightGear handles 3ds

2004-07-16 Thread Erik Hofman
Ampere K. Hardraade wrote: Bump. So, is my idea a good one or a bad one? There doesn't seem to be much response... There has been some discussion related to this off-line. No conclusions where drawn yet. Part of the problem is that we need some one to do the coding, and then we need to

RE: [Flightgear-devel] Spitfire

2004-07-16 Thread Vivian Meazza
Erik Hofman wrote Sent: 16 July 2004 08:44 To: FlightGear developers discussions Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Spitfire Vivian Meazza wrote: Back up with an upgraded machine - 2.8 Mhz P4, 512 Ram, Gforce 5200. I've rebuilt Cywin, and FGFS-CVS. I've just copied the latest version

[Flightgear-devel] This quarter, production Fokker 70 should resume!

2004-07-16 Thread Erik Hofman
It is a bit of a shameless plug, but it's for my own interest :-D Found at http://www.luchtzak.be/article4876.html It is the intention that this trimester the production of Fokker 70 planes is resumed. This is anounced by the commercial director Ruud Kleinendorst from Rekkof today (8 April) in

[Flightgear-devel] Next release of FlightGear

2004-07-16 Thread Curtis L. Olson
I've started doing some of the pre-release work for FlightGear-0.9.5 (which is the next release.) That means I'd like to do our official next release in the next week or two. Please take a few minutes to download the tar balls and test this pre1 release. Please! This is our quality control

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Next release of FlightGear

2004-07-16 Thread Ampere K. Hardraade
The file or folder /site/ftp.flightgear.org/flightgear-ftp/Source/FlightGear-0.9.5-pre1.tar.gz does not exist. Did anyone encounter this problem? Regards, Ampere On July 16, 2004 11:34 am, Curtis L. Olson wrote: I've started doing some of the pre-release work for FlightGear-0.9.5 (which is

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Next release of FlightGear

2004-07-16 Thread Curtis L. Olson
Ampere K. Hardraade wrote: The file or folder /site/ftp.flightgear.org/flightgear-ftp/Source/FlightGear-0.9.5-pre1.tar.gz does not exist. Did anyone encounter this problem? Most likely sunsite hasn't sync'd it's mirror yet. You can always go direct to ftp://ftp.flightgear.org Regards,

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Next release of FlightGear

2004-07-16 Thread Durk Talsma
Curt and others, Just a quick question: Does this mean, we're entering a feature-freeze period now? The reason I'm asking is that I have some upates for the traffic manager that I was planning to clean-up a bit and submit by the end of the weekend. This new code, while humble in size, is going

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Next release of FlightGear

2004-07-16 Thread Martin Spott
Ampere K. Hardraade wrote: The file or folder /site/ftp.flightgear.org/flightgear-ftp/Source/FlightGear-0.9.5-pre1.tar.gz ^^ does not exist. Simply put a de. in there, Martin. -- Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Next release of FlightGear

2004-07-16 Thread Curtis L. Olson
Durk Talsma wrote: Curt and others, Just a quick question: Does this mean, we're entering a feature-freeze period now? Yes, I apologize for not being 100% clear ... I'm juggling way too many things this summer, but I'm still trying to get a release out. The reason I'm asking is that I have

[Flightgear-devel] FW: [Mapserver-users] Seek GPS mobile service experiment participants

2004-07-16 Thread Norman Vine
fyi -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Changqing Zhou Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 2:57 PM To: MapServer Subject: [Mapserver-users] Seek GPS mobile service experiment participants This message is not directly related to map server;

[Flightgear-devel] Turn Coordination

2004-07-16 Thread sonny hammaker
does anyone know of the equations that are used to determine how coordinated a turn is? I notice in the hud view mode there is a coordinated turn gauge, and in the distant modes, there is also a coordinated turn indicator. thanks ___

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Advertisements on the FG web site?

2004-07-16 Thread Frederic Bouvier
Curtis L. Olson wrote: I want to bring a new subject before the group. In the past we have discussed potential income sources for the FG project, so I think it's fair to discuss another option since the opportunity has introduced itself today. There is a company that makes hardware (3d

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Advertisements on the FG web site?

2004-07-16 Thread Lee Elliott
On Friday 16 July 2004 22:02, Curtis L. Olson wrote: I want to bring a new subject before the group. In the past we have discussed potential income sources for the FG project, so I think it's fair to discuss another option since the opportunity has introduced itself today. There is a

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Advertisements on the FG web site?

2004-07-16 Thread Chris Metzler
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 16:02:31 -0500 Curtis L. Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any thoughts? Any strong feelings? We get a pretty good chunk of daily hits so we do have some referring power to swing around. What do you think? Wrong way down the slippery slope? Good idea? I'll buy

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Advertisements on the FG web site?

2004-07-16 Thread Ampere K. Hardraade
On July 16, 2004 05:17 pm, Frederic Bouvier wrote: Would it be a single company or a space broker ? Would you be able to control the content of the advertisement ? I am not opposed if it is related to aviation or computing. -Fred What he said. If we do go ahead with this idea, would it

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Advertisements on the FG web site?

2004-07-16 Thread Curtis L. Olson
Lee Elliott wrote: IMO, money exists and until there's either a well thought out alternative, or no further need for it, you might as well try to get along with it. Clever way to put it. :-) However, there is a degree of implied endorsement and association so I think that anything 'endorsed'

RE: [Flightgear-devel] Advertisements on the FG web site?

2004-07-16 Thread Vivian Meazza
Lee Elliott wrote Sent: 16 July 2004 22:18 To: FlightGear developers discussions Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Advertisements on the FG web site? On Friday 16 July 2004 22:02, Curtis L. Olson wrote: I want to bring a new subject before the group. In the past we have discussed

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Advertisements on the FG web site?

2004-07-16 Thread Lee Elliott
On Friday 16 July 2004 22:41, Curtis L. Olson wrote: Lee Elliott wrote: IMO, money exists and until there's either a well thought out alternative, or no further need for it, you might as well try to get along with it. Clever way to put it. :-) However, there is a degree of implied

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Advertisements on the FG web site?

2004-07-16 Thread Christian Mayer
Curtis L. Olson schrieb: I want to bring a new subject before the group. [...] If we put banner adds on our web site, and one of our visiters clicks through and buys something from this company (being referred from our site) then we would get a 10% commission from the sale. I believe there is

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Advertisements on the FG web site?

2004-07-16 Thread Lee Elliott
Speaking as a user/contributor - not as a member of the project, so this is just my personal opinion: Assuming there are no Linux drivers, how would they feel about GPL'd ones? Personally, while I much prefer GPL software and would really like it if they did GPL a Linux driver, I'm not

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Turn Coordination

2004-07-16 Thread David Megginson
sonny hammaker wrote: does anyone know of the equations that are used to determine how coordinated a turn is? Side force (along the y axis) = 0. All the best, David ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Not a good idea (was Re: [Flightgear-devel] Advertisements on the FG web site?)

2004-07-16 Thread Lee Elliott
On Friday 16 July 2004 23:45, David Megginson wrote: Curtis L. Olson wrote: But any way you cut it, putting advertisements on our web site will change the look and feel of our web site and probably influence the impression our project projects to the world ... Yes, it will make a

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Turn Coordination

2004-07-16 Thread Ampere K. Hardraade
This may help: http://regentsprep.org/Regents/physics/phys06/bcentrif/default.htm Regards, Ampere On July 16, 2004 04:26 pm, sonny hammaker wrote: does anyone know of the equations that are used to determine how coordinated a turn is? I notice in the hud view mode there is a coordinated

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Advertisements on the FG web site?

2004-07-16 Thread Boris Koenig
Good morining, just dropping in from one of the other timezones ;-) I've also got some thoughts regarding this whole sponsoring idea, and to be direct: I do have to admit that I wouldn't have any problems with such a model, actually it's just a couple of days ago that I talked to other FlightGear

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Next release of FlightGear

2004-07-16 Thread Ampere K. Hardraade
I've got an error during compiliation: -DPKGLIBDIR=\/usr/share/FlightGear/share/FlightGear\ -g -O2 -D_REENTRANT -c -o viewer.o `test -f viewer.cxx || echo './'`viewer.cxx source='viewmgr.cxx' object='viewmgr.o' libtool=no \ depfile='.deps/viewmgr.Po' tmpdepfile='.deps/viewmgr.TPo' \ depmode=gcc3

Re: Not a good idea (was Re: [Flightgear-devel] Advertisements on the FG web site?)

2004-07-16 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 23:53:51 +0100, Lee wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Friday 16 July 2004 23:45, David Megginson wrote: ...wisdom omitted... These are good points. Glad it's not my call. ..amen. ..they want banner ads, they ship us free hardware and pay us to write GPL drivers

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Next release of FlightGear

2004-07-16 Thread Ampere K. Hardraade
Oh, I forgot to mention, I installed simgear in /usr/share/simgear and tried to do the same with FlightGear in /usr/share/FlightGear. I used the following commands when I was compiling FlightGear: ./configure --prefix=/usr/share/FlightGear --with-simgear=/usr/share/simgear make (with the error

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Next release of FlightGear

2004-07-16 Thread Ampere K. Hardraade
Correction: Not only is fgfs missing, but so are metar, terrasync, and (est-epsilon?). Regards, Ampere On July 17, 2004 12:42 am, Ampere K. Hardraade wrote: Oh, I forgot to mention, I installed simgear in /usr/share/simgear and tried to do the same with FlightGear in /usr/share/FlightGear. I

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Advertisements on the FG web site?

2004-07-16 Thread John Wojnaroski
Curtis wrote: I want to bring a new subject before the group. In the past we have discussed potential income sources for the FG project, so I think it's fair to discuss another option since the opportunity has introduced itself today. There is a company that makes hardware (3d glasses,