Did someone already do a CYgWin build?
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
I'll have the Red Hat/Fedora packages available in the
next day or so.
On Sat, 2004-07-31 at 00:36, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
> The official v0.9.5 source tarball and base package is now up on the ftp
> sites and I've updated the website as well. I plan to email out an
> "official" announcement l
On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 22:44:19 +0200, Erik wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Arnt Karlsen wrote:
>
> >>Erik
> >>
> >>(Ever used the bicycle to cycle up a steep hill?)
> >
> > ..is "overhang" steep enough? ;-)
>
> On a bicycle?
..yup. Classic case of _find_-a-way and stay-_off_-the-brakes
On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 16:11:29 +0100
"Vivian Meazza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I downloaded FGFS cvs this morning. There appears to be an error in
> gui.nas:
>
> 166 if(cap 1) { continue; }
>
> I assume this to be a typo or corruption. I guess that it should be
>
> 166 if(cap <= 0.1)
Erik Hofman wrote:
Jon Stockill wrote:
Erik Hofman wrote:
My personal opinion would be to get everything at one place,
preferably (but not necessarily) in a separate CVS branch at
flightgear.org just like the world wide scenery right now. That would
be easiest for everybody (and provides mirror
Jon Stockill wrote:
Erik Hofman wrote:
My personal opinion would be to get everything at one place,
preferably (but not necessarily) in a separate CVS branch at
flightgear.org just like the world wide scenery right now. That would
be easiest for everybody (and provides mirror sites).
That makes
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
Erik
(Ever used the bicycle to cycle up a steep hill?)
..is "overhang" steep enough? ;-)
On a bicycle?
Erik
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c
On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 21:07:28 +0200, Ron wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Boris Koenig schrieb:
>
> > Ron Lange wrote:
> >
> > > Thank you Durk! I hope that someone is making a patch of the final
> > > base package soon...;-)
> >
> >
> > Just to get this straight: you'd need a patch from
Dear Boris!
Just a patch chain (pre2->pre3->final) would be nice...
Regards
Ron
Boris Koenig schrieb:
Ron Lange wrote:
Thank you Durk! I hope that someone is making a patch of the final
base package soon...;-)
Just to get this straight: you'd need a patch from pre2 -> 0.9.5 ?
Is there anybody el
- Original Message -
From: "Lee Elliott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "FlightGear developers discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, July 31, 2004 8:46 AM
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Data source battle?
> On Friday 30 July 2004 23:19, John Wojnaroski wrote:
> > When using real-ti
Ron Lange wrote:
Thank you Durk! I hope that someone is making a patch of the final base
package soon...;-)
Just to get this straight: you'd need a patch from pre2 -> 0.9.5 ?
Is there anybody else who would like to see such a patch ?
Arnt, for which pre-version do you need a patch ?
Bori
Thank you Durk! I hope that someone is making a patch of the final base
package soon...;-) then I'll get out of trouble.
Ron
Durk Talsma schrieb:
Hi Ron,
That explains it: In version pre2, MD11 traffic is still generated, but the
required aircraft is not included in the base package. Around the
On Saturday 31 July 2004 17:02, Jon Berndt wrote:
> > I don't use real weather because most of my flying is to test the fdms
> > I'm working on,
>
> Just so I am clear, when you say "fdms" are you referring to Flight
> Dynamics Model source code, or are you referring to something I'd call an
> Airc
> I don't use real weather because most of my flying is to test the fdms I'm
> working on,
Just so I am clear, when you say "fdms" are you referring to Flight Dynamics Model
source
code, or are you referring to something I'd call an Aircraft Flight Model (AFM) or
Aircraft Flight Model Definition
On Friday 30 July 2004 23:19, John Wojnaroski wrote:
> When using real-time weather via the net and the native-ctrls interface to
> input control data to FG it appears both "sources" attempt to write to the
> environmental properties; this is most noticeable with the wind vector and
> discontinuiti
I downloaded FGFS cvs this morning. There appears to be an error in gui.nas:
166 if(cap 1) { continue; }
I assume this to be a typo or corruption. I guess that it should be
166 if(cap <= 0.1) { continue; }
ISR this having been mentioned at some time. Even if this line is corrected,
it doe
Jon Stockill wrote:
Erik Hofman wrote:
My personal opinion would be to get everything at one place,
preferably (but not necessarily) in a separate CVS branch at
flightgear.org just like the world wide scenery right now. That would
be easiest for everybody (and provides mirror sites).
That makes
On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 15:11:38 +0200, Erik wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Norman Vine wrote:
>
> > No No .. it's the earth that sucks as there is no gravity !
>
> Yeah, that would really suck. But a bit less might be a blessing
> sometimes.
>
> Erik
>
> (Ever used the bicycle to cycle
Erik Hofman wrote:
My personal opinion would be to get everything at one place, preferably
(but not necessarily) in a separate CVS branch at flightgear.org just
like the world wide scenery right now. That would be easiest for
everybody (and provides mirror sites).
That makes life very easy for u
Chris Metzler wrote:
> Mat Churchill and I are both enthusiastic about such a scenery
> website.
>
> What do people think?
I think some sort of centralised list of what people have been working
on is a great way to go - for both finished scenery, and models too -
obviously there are limits to what
Martin Spott wrote:
"Curtis L. Olson" wrote:
[...] So if you are one of our
package builders, please let me know as soon as you have v0.9.5 ready to
go and I will update the web site.
Solaris/Sparc is currently building - but it takes a while on an old
Sparc20 :-)
Ouch
Which compiler are you
Norman Vine wrote:
No No .. it's the earth that sucks as there is no gravity !
Yeah, that would really suck. But a bit less might be a blessing sometimes.
Erik
(Ever used the bicycle to cycle up a steep hill?)
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROT
Josh Babcock wrote:
You're jst bottoming out. Happens at many airports. The new scenery
has much flatter runways, but many of the big ones are still not
perfectly flat like I suspect they should be.
Runways are hardly ever really flat. They always follow the surface
somewhat (sometimes even qu
Durk Talsma wrote:
Hi Guys,
Okay, here's an interesting take-off problem.
Try running fgfs --airport=FHAW --aircraft=747
The runway has a pretty big slope and as soon as the nose wheel hits the
sloping part, the FDM freezes.
Cheers,
Durk
P.S., running fgfs-0.9.5-pre3, base-0.9.5-pre3, and terra
Erik Hofman writes:
>
> Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:42:48 -0400, Ampere wrote in message
> >
> >>On July 28, 2004 03:06 pm, Jon S Berndt wrote:
> >>
> >>>So, from the point of view of the horizontal stabilizor, that pesky
> >>>downwash happens because "wings really suck". ;-)
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:42:48 -0400, Ampere wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On July 28, 2004 03:06 pm, Jon S Berndt wrote:
So, from the point of view of the horizontal stabilizor, that pesky
downwash happens because "wings really suck". ;-)
I guess that's one of the reaso
Hi Ron,
That explains it: In version pre2, MD11 traffic is still generated, but the
required aircraft is not included in the base package. Around the time one
you're trying to start, one of the KLM MD11's starting from of heading for
Asmterdam is probably causing trouble. Version pre3 has its o
Chris Metzler wrote:
[...]
So what we discussed was a webpage/site which would (eventually) do for
FlightGear what avsim.com/flightsim.com's file libraries do for MSFS.
At least at first, it'd provide upload/browse/download capability.
Even though I agree with Erik that it would make sense to keep
For what it's worth, FlightGear 0.9.5 for IRIX is available at:
http://www.1stweb.nl/~ehofman/fgfs/
Erik
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
Hi Durk,
here are the requested informations:
fgfs-versions: FlightGear-0.9.5-pre2 / fgfs-base-0.9.5-pre2.tar.gz
starting time: between 10:00am and 1:00pm (noon here in germany, while
my son's sleeping...;-)
ADEP: ETHB - Bückeburg, Germany (located in the e000n50 scenerey) with
the Bo105
Regards
On Saturday 31 July 2004 12:26, Ron Lange wrote:
> did I say sporadic? I am just trying for 2 hours getting fgfs to
> start...damn
> Ron
>
> > #8 0x0842ac65 in FGAISchedule::update (this=0xa555c08, now=1091246021)
> > at Schedule.cxx:292
> > #9 0x084227e7 in FGTrafficManager::update (this=0xa54
Martin Spott wrote:
> Solaris/Sparc is currently building - but it takes a while on an old
> Sparc20 :-)
The package is present at the usual place:
ftp://ftp.uni-duisburg.de/FlightGear/Solaris/fgfs-0.9.5-Solaris.tar.gz
I'm planning to create a package for the regular Solaris installer but
I'
did I say sporadic? I am just trying for 2 hours getting fgfs to
start...damn
Ron
Ron Lange schrieb:
hi all,
aborting means SIGABRT, IMHO. Unfortunately I've similar effects on my
system, although they're appearing sporadic it is annoying. After
several attempts fgfs starts then. I am not sure
hi all,
aborting means SIGABRT, IMHO. Unfortunately I've similar effects on my
system, although they're appearing sporadic it is annoying. After
several attempts fgfs starts then. I am not sure but it seems to be an
issue in the FGAI. Just a guess.
Regards Ron
Here the gdb-backtrace:
Starting p
Norman Vine wrote:
Boris Koenig writes:
I mentioned
primarily "bzflag" - cause it is based on SimGear
Hmm .. very interesting .
as bzflag predates SimGear ...
lol, don't tell me now that I was wrong ?
could you please tell us your source of this information
as I didn't see any mention of
Boris Koenig writes:
>>
> I mentioned
> primarily "bzflag" - cause it is based on SimGear
Hmm .. very interesting .
as bzflag predates SimGear ...
could you please tell us your source of this information
as I didn't see any mention of SimGear in a quick perusal
of the bzflag source c
Hi Guys,
Okay, here's an interesting take-off problem.
Try running fgfs --airport=FHAW --aircraft=747
The runway has a pretty big slope and as soon as the nose wheel hits the
sloping part, the FDM freezes.
Cheers,
Durk
P.S., running fgfs-0.9.5-pre3, base-0.9.5-pre3, and terrasync scenery dow
Chris Metzler wrote:
I've been waiting to post this until after the release went out, hoping
there'd be more discussion when things were a tiny bit calmer . . .
Over time, various people have done a lot of work on ground structures,
etc., to add to the scenery for FlightGear. Frederic's did a lot
38 matches
Mail list logo
