Ampere K. Hardraade wrote:
On May 15, 2005 10:21 am, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
PS: TODO for 1.0:
- perfect weather (almost) done
- per-wheel gound reactions YASim: done; JSBSim: :-( UIUC: bah!
- help system (a bit unsophisticated, but) done
- a/c
I suppose it's a little off topic, but it seems like something you guys
would know about (since it seems like I saw it here to begin with, anyway)
Would any of you know where I can find the image somewhat matching this
description:
A swimsuit model with big gazongas, with general information
Martin Spott wrote:
Jonathan Richards wrote:
I had a cunning plan to burn FGBenchmark onto business card CDs for giveaway
at the forthcoming Linux exhibition in London, but 0.0.3 is too big for the
media, which only takes 50 MB.
I'll have a look at it this week (I'm on holiday the next week
I download the Win32 package watch the list. I'm using Win32 mostly
because I can never get hardware acceleration working in linux, and my
linux box is off-line in my parent's basement waiting till I move to my
own place. Anyone have any academic type jobs for me that pay enough to
pay
I might be willing to see what I can do.
I've been on a extracting things from other things kick lately, like
pulling midi files out of proprietary archive files.
How much harder can this be? If they're not too big/too many files, sent
them my way, I'll take a shot in my spare time.
JD
Curtis
This is pretty sad.
It's times like this when I start to consider relocating to Canadia to
find a job and live there, much as I bash on it (jokingly, of course; it
really wouldn't do to be bashing our 51st state).
David Megginson wrote:
Jon Stockill wrote:
US developers/users need to be
miles distance. Thus, it seems reasonable to me to possibly
show the sun as being smaller than earth.
As for eclipses, I imagine you'd see them, even if they were beyond the
horizon. =P
JD
Jonathan Richards wrote:
On Thursday 27 Nov 2003 5:23 am, JD Fenech wrote:
Not too shabby, but it probably
This really doesn't seem like such a difficult subject to me.
If one were to use a crude approximation of a flat plane drawn out to
intersect the ray from the eye to the sun, it would work, but...
If you want to be really clever, use a spherical or spheroidal
approximation to determine where
Stupid idea: Has anyone thought to make a simple FDM for ground
vechicles? I admit it might get boring quickly, but in a multiplay
situation, it might be intresting to allow someone to simply watch
takeoffs from the ground, with a mobile camera. It's half-assed, and
since I can barely get FG
Ok, I'm having a bit of trouble getting the release version of
flightgear to compile under cygwin. I'm hardly an expert at getting
major projects to compile, so I'm not quite sure what the problem even is.
I've pasted the error at the bottom, so if anyone has any thoughts on
it, maybe you can
:)
- Original Message -
From: JD Fenech [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 9:05 PM
Subject: [Flightgear-devel] Compile issues
Ok, I'm having a bit of trouble getting the release version of
flightgear to compile under cygwin. I'm hardly an expert
I know this is slightly off topic, but what is the possibility of having
a one aircraft, one file type configuration. The idea is basically to
put all of the requisite files for a particular aircraft into some kind
of archive file, such as a tarball, and then drop the archives into one
I know it isn't quite development related, but you guys seem like the
best folks to
ask this question...
I'm a fifth-year senior, CompSci major with physics and math minors...
I have an interest in cosmology/astronomy/simulation/etc.
I'm looking for a good grad school where I can put these
If you really want LHX, I can send you my copy.
It's so old I doubt anyone sells it anymore. I think that
might have been the first flight sim I played too.
Curiouser and curiouser.
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003 19:31:53 -0600,
Mike Bonar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL
Technically, Y'alls is more of a possesive form of Y'all.
At least that's how I use it. Y'all can use it yall's own way.
And yes, that paticular usage is techically wrong too, considering
that its usually used to refer to an physical object, such as an
airplane :)
Nyeh.
Y'all have fun.
Jon
This is just a thought, and since I'm definitely no expert at the internals,
please feel free to
bash the idea. This seems like a possibly reasonable way to add other elements
to the scenery,
such as buildings, towers, bridges, roads, etc. I'm just a college kid, haven't
actually worked on
Make sure the mirror really isn't a parabolic one. 40 mirrors are pretty big to be
anywhere
near perfectly spherical.
Also, the reflected image will form on your retina, so where you put your eye has
plenty
of importance. Also, the optics of your eye might have an effect :)
*grins* What a
Huh?
JD
--
The modern definition of 'racist' is someone who is winning an argument
with a liberal.
--Peter Brimelow
Marcio Shimoda wrote:
BRAZIL
2002 World Cup Champion
And we are 2nd (GERMANY)
Ok, CU in Germany 2006
[]'s
Marcio Shimoda
18 matches
Mail list logo
