Alex Romosan wrote:
that was exactly the original problem: changes in simgear
would involve a
full recompilation of flightgear if you use static libraries. and
compiling flightgear does take a very long time. now, if you use
dynamic libraries, you can make your change in simgear and
* Karsten Krispin -- Sunday 08 May 2005 02:30:
just a small question: is it hard to include simgear as shared libs?
When you want to change something in simgear you have to recompile fgfs. that
needs pretty too long.
Or is there a trick?
No trick for avoiding to recompile fgfs, but for not
Karsten Krispin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
yes. would be cool if you send me a patch.
this is the patch:
patch.simgear.bz2
Description: simgear as shared lib
the last part gets simgear to use a system installed expat lib, so you
might not want to apply it. after you apply the patch you need
Martin Spott [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello Karsten,
Karsten Krispin wrote:
just a small question: is it hard to include simgear as shared libs?
No, it's not dificult at all. But you probably don't _want_ to, because
changes in FlightGear sometimes relate to changes in SimGear so you
Alex Romosan wrote:
that was exactly the original problem: changes in simgear would involve a
full recompilation of flightgear if you use static libraries.
Well, if you do substantial changes to SimGear that affects the
headers, then you have to recompile the relating parts of FlightGear
Alex Romosan wrote:
that was exactly the original problem: changes in simgear would involve a
full recompilation of flightgear if you use static libraries. and
compiling flightgear does take a very long time. now, if you use
dynamic libraries, you can make your change in simgear and just go fly
Am Sonntag 08 Mai 2005 19:33 schrieb Martin Spott:
Alex Romosan wrote:
that was exactly the original problem: changes in simgear would involve a
full recompilation of flightgear if you use static libraries.
Well, if you do substantial changes to SimGear that affects the
headers, then you
Sorry, I normally wouldn't send corrections on my message but I made
some lazy typos that make my message more confusing than it should have
been. Let me try again ...
Using static or dynamic libs really doesn't make that much difference
when recompiling FlightGear. It is your installation
Karsten Krispin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
just a small question: is it hard to include simgear as shared libs?
When you want to change something in simgear you have to recompile
fgfs. that needs pretty too long.
i can send you a patch (i've been building simgear as shared libs for
the
Am Sonntag 08 Mai 2005 04:26 schrieben Sie:
Am Sonntag 08 Mai 2005 03:22 schrieb Alex Romosan:
Karsten Krispin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
just a small question: is it hard to include simgear as shared libs?
When you want to change something in simgear you have to recompile
fgfs. that
10 matches
Mail list logo
