FYI
I am currenrtly compiling against FreeGlut in my MinGW32
environment and expect that it would just work on Linux and
other 'X' platforms
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mike
> A. Harris
> Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2003 1:17 AM
> To:
I've got that data, I think. Roskam got it from somewhere else. A lot of
his numbers came from an oft-cited NASA tech note that featured several
aircraft. I'd copy it, but it's huge.
Anyhow, for those guys that have made JSBSim models lately, do we have a
turbine for it?
> From Roskam:
>
> Wt= 6
"Curtis L. Olson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Tim Jelliffe writes:
> > I have to say, that this looks awesome. Very impressive!
>
> I'm not a big fan of "me too" messages, but in this case I have to
> second this motion. :-)
Thanks for the good words (to everyone) :-) I'm just finishing up a KD
Tim Jelliffe writes:
> I have to say, that this looks awesome. Very impressive!
I'm not a big fan of "me too" messages, but in this case I have to
second this motion. :-)
Curt.
--
Curtis Olson IVLab / HumanFIRST Program FlightGear Project
Twin Citiescurt 'at' me.umn.edu c
I
have to say, that this looks awesome. Very impressive!
Tim J
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
> Speaking of 747's, has anyone made a JSBSim 747 FDM, yet? I've got some
> data. If nobody has, I might give that a shot this evening. IT would at
> least be a start.
From Roskam:
Wt= 636,000
Ixx= 1820
Iyy= 3310
Izz= 4970
Ixz= 97
Clbeta= -.16
Clp= -.34
Clr= .13
Cnbeta= .16
Cnp=
Lee Elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I saw you'd reverted the target climb rate calcs in cvs and now that the old
> alt hold is back I can see that the auto throttle response seems considerably
> improved.
>
You may want to play with the gain factor and integral for throttle to. If
you fin
Frederic Bouvier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Jim Wilson wrote:
> > It seemed like it'd be ok to commit what I have so far for 3d
> instrumentation
> > in the boeing 747-400. Screen shot:
> >
> > http://www.spiderbark.com/fgfs/747-400-panel-01.png
>
> Looks good, but it seems some .xml are missing
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
> Jim Wilson wrote:
> > It seemed like it'd be ok to commit what I have so far for 3d
> instrumentation
> > in the boeing 747-400. Screen shot:
> >
> > http://www.spiderbark.com/fgfs/747-400-panel-01.png
>
> Looks good, but it seems some .xml are missi
Speaking of 747's, has anyone made a JSBSim 747 FDM, yet? I've got some
data. If nobody has, I might give that a shot this evening. IT would at
least be a start.
Jon
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailm
Jim Wilson wrote:
> It seemed like it'd be ok to commit what I have so far for 3d
instrumentation
> in the boeing 747-400. Screen shot:
>
> http://www.spiderbark.com/fgfs/747-400-panel-01.png
Looks good, but it seems some .xml are missing in CVS. For example,
boeing747-400-pfd-jw.xml specified in
On Sat, 2003-07-19 at 14:12, Tony Peden wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-07-19 at 14:04, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > > Am Samstag, 19. Juli 2003 22:21 schrieb Christopher S Horler:
> > > > This sometimes happens when I reset - I can't reproduce it everytime,
> > > > I'm looking in
It seemed like it'd be ok to commit what I have so far for 3d instrumentation
in the boeing 747-400. Screen shot:
http://www.spiderbark.com/fgfs/747-400-panel-01.png
Basically it works but there are a few problems:
1. I need to go back over the geometry for 16bit depth. It does work on the
16mb
On Saturday 19 July 2003 14:33, Lee Elliott wrote:
> On Saturday 19 July 2003 14:00, Jim Wilson wrote:
> > Lee Elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> >
> > >
> > > Could youi give me a quick nod when there's a new vers to try?
> >
> > After looking some more, I'm going to hold off on that for now.
On Sat, 2003-07-19 at 14:04, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > Am Samstag, 19. Juli 2003 22:21 schrieb Christopher S Horler:
> > > This sometimes happens when I reset - I can't reproduce it everytime,
> > > I'm looking into things that may make it happen - it seems almost like
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Am Samstag, 19. Juli 2003 22:21 schrieb Christopher S Horler:
> > This sometimes happens when I reset - I can't reproduce it everytime,
> > I'm looking into things that may make it happen - it seems almost like
> > some values are being initialized incorrectly i.e. the p
Am Samstag, 19. Juli 2003 22:21 schrieb Christopher S Horler:
> This sometimes happens when I reset - I can't reproduce it everytime,
> I'm looking into things that may make it happen - it seems almost like
> some values are being initialized incorrectly i.e. the plane starts the
> right way up the
This sometimes happens when I reset - I can't reproduce it everytime,
I'm looking into things that may make it happen - it seems almost like
some values are being initialized incorrectly i.e. the plane starts the
right way up then goes through a 180 degree half loop.
http://www.zen11419.zen.co.uk/
Richard A Downing writes:
>
> I'm working my way through some of the UK aerodromes, and have hit some problems
> agreeing ANY of the decimal coordinates
> in the FG files with the DMS coordinates given in the UK AIP.
>
> For instance, London Gatwick (EGKK) has ARP at N510853 W0001125, which by
Roland Häder wrote:
Hello.
Here are my patches files. Please check them out and include them in
your project.
These files has been testet with a "Phoenix Joystick (4-axis,
4-buttons).
Thanks Roland,
I will check them out and put them in CVS when I have some time. It will
probably be tomorrow
Jim Wilson wrote:
Erik Hofman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Update of /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Aircraft/fokker100
In directory baron:/tmp/cvs-serv5280/Aircraft/fokker100
Log Message:
Directory /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Aircraft/fokker100 added to the
repository
Hi Erik,
Think we're still mis
Erik Hofman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Update of /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Aircraft/fokker100
> In directory baron:/tmp/cvs-serv5280/Aircraft/fokker100
>
> Log Message:
> Directory /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Aircraft/fokker100 added to the
repository
Hi Erik,
Think we're still missing the
On Saturday 19 July 2003 14:00, Jim Wilson wrote:
> Lee Elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> >
> > Could youi give me a quick nod when there's a new vers to try?
>
> After looking some more, I'm going to hold off on that for now. Go ahead
and
> use the patch I posted last night. What I was s
On Saturday 19 July 2003 08:37, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * Lee Elliott -- Saturday 19 July 2003 00:54:
> > I'm with Michael entirely on this. Adding new stuff is
> > great but not if it's at the expense of old features.
>
> Sigh ... We =do= remove old features once in a while (and
> Network-OLK w
Lee Elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> Could youi give me a quick nod when there's a new vers to try?
After looking some more, I'm going to hold off on that for now. Go ahead and
use the patch I posted last night. What I was shooting for was a little more
smoothness when switching from V/S
On Saturday 19 July 2003 05:21, Jim Wilson wrote:
> Lee Elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > With the YF-23 it's
> > very obvious.
>
> Hi Lee,
>
> In a separate message I've sent a patch to backout the target climb rate
fix.
> I was able to stabalize the A/P by making adjustments with the f
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 20:30:15 -0400
"Norman Vine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Richard A Downing writes:
> >
> > I'm working my way through some of the UK aerodromes, and have hit
> some problems agreeing ANY of the decimal coordinates
> > in the FG files with the DMS coordinates given in the UK
* Michael Selig -- Friday 18 July 2003 23:53:
> Something interesting about your damped view is that it appears
> to simulate what MSFS has in their chase view
That's disgusting. But I'm innocent. I don't have Micros~1 installed,
let alone MSFS. I just wanted to have a real chase view, that at le
* Lee Elliott -- Saturday 19 July 2003 00:54:
> I'm with Michael entirely on this. Adding new stuff is
> great but not if it's at the expense of old features.
Sigh ... We =do= remove old features once in a while (and
Network-OLK will be the next ;-), but in this case you are
preaching to the cho
29 matches
Mail list logo
