Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 13:13:20 +0200, Boris wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Maybe that saves some time or at least keeps you from re-inventing
the wheel ;-)
..maybe. Executive summary from http://www.phoenixosfs.org/ ;-)
BTW, interesting project but they don't seem to
Chris Metzler wrote:
I've been waiting to post this until after the release went out, hoping
there'd be more discussion when things were a tiny bit calmer . . .
Over time, various people have done a lot of work on ground structures,
etc., to add to the scenery for FlightGear. Frederic's did a lot
Hi Guys,
Okay, here's an interesting take-off problem.
Try running fgfs --airport=FHAW --aircraft=747
The runway has a pretty big slope and as soon as the nose wheel hits the
sloping part, the FDM freezes.
Cheers,
Durk
P.S., running fgfs-0.9.5-pre3, base-0.9.5-pre3, and terrasync scenery
Boris Koenig writes:
I mentioned
primarily bzflag - cause it is based on SimGear
Hmm .. very interesting .
as bzflag predates SimGear ...
could you please tell us your source of this information
as I didn't see any mention of SimGear in a quick perusal
of the bzflag source code
Norman Vine wrote:
Boris Koenig writes:
I mentioned
primarily bzflag - cause it is based on SimGear
Hmm .. very interesting .
as bzflag predates SimGear ...
lol, don't tell me now that I was wrong ?
could you please tell us your source of this information
as I didn't see any mention of
hi all,
aborting means SIGABRT, IMHO. Unfortunately I've similar effects on my
system, although they're appearing sporadic it is annoying. After
several attempts fgfs starts then. I am not sure but it seems to be an
issue in the FGAI. Just a guess.
Regards Ron
Here the gdb-backtrace:
Starting
Hi Durk,
here are the requested informations:
fgfs-versions: FlightGear-0.9.5-pre2 / fgfs-base-0.9.5-pre2.tar.gz
starting time: between 10:00am and 1:00pm (noon here in germany, while
my son's sleeping...;-)
ADEP: ETHB - Bückeburg, Germany (located in the e000n50 scenerey) with
the Bo105
Regards
For what it's worth, FlightGear 0.9.5 for IRIX is available at:
http://www.1stweb.nl/~ehofman/fgfs/
Erik
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
Chris Metzler wrote:
[...]
So what we discussed was a webpage/site which would (eventually) do for
FlightGear what avsim.com/flightsim.com's file libraries do for MSFS.
At least at first, it'd provide upload/browse/download capability.
Even though I agree with Erik that it would make sense to
Hi Ron,
That explains it: In version pre2, MD11 traffic is still generated, but the
required aircraft is not included in the base package. Around the time one
you're trying to start, one of the KLM MD11's starting from of heading for
Asmterdam is probably causing trouble. Version pre3 has its
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:42:48 -0400, Ampere wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On July 28, 2004 03:06 pm, Jon S Berndt wrote:
So, from the point of view of the horizontal stabilizor, that pesky
downwash happens because wings really suck. ;-)
I guess that's one of the reasons
Erik Hofman writes:
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:42:48 -0400, Ampere wrote in message
On July 28, 2004 03:06 pm, Jon S Berndt wrote:
So, from the point of view of the horizontal stabilizor, that pesky
downwash happens because wings really suck. ;-)
I guess that's one
Durk Talsma wrote:
Hi Guys,
Okay, here's an interesting take-off problem.
Try running fgfs --airport=FHAW --aircraft=747
The runway has a pretty big slope and as soon as the nose wheel hits the
sloping part, the FDM freezes.
Cheers,
Durk
P.S., running fgfs-0.9.5-pre3, base-0.9.5-pre3, and
On Friday 30 July 2004 23:19, John Wojnaroski wrote:
When using real-time weather via the net and the native-ctrls interface to
input control data to FG it appears both sources attempt to write to the
environmental properties; this is most noticeable with the wind vector and
discontinuities in
I don't use real weather because most of my flying is to test the fdms I'm
working on,
Just so I am clear, when you say fdms are you referring to Flight Dynamics Model
source
code, or are you referring to something I'd call an Aircraft Flight Model (AFM) or
Aircraft Flight Model Definition
On Saturday 31 July 2004 17:02, Jon Berndt wrote:
I don't use real weather because most of my flying is to test the fdms
I'm working on,
Just so I am clear, when you say fdms are you referring to Flight
Dynamics Model source code, or are you referring to something I'd call an
Aircraft
Thank you Durk! I hope that someone is making a patch of the final base
package soon...;-) then I'll get out of trouble.
Ron
Durk Talsma schrieb:
Hi Ron,
That explains it: In version pre2, MD11 traffic is still generated, but the
required aircraft is not included in the base package. Around the
Ron Lange wrote:
Thank you Durk! I hope that someone is making a patch of the final base
package soon...;-)
Just to get this straight: you'd need a patch from pre2 - 0.9.5 ?
Is there anybody else who would like to see such a patch ?
Arnt, for which pre-version do you need a patch ?
- Original Message -
From: Lee Elliott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: FlightGear developers discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 31, 2004 8:46 AM
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Data source battle?
On Friday 30 July 2004 23:19, John Wojnaroski wrote:
When using real-time weather
Dear Boris!
Just a patch chain (pre2-pre3-final) would be nice...
Regards
Ron
Boris Koenig schrieb:
Ron Lange wrote:
Thank you Durk! I hope that someone is making a patch of the final
base package soon...;-)
Just to get this straight: you'd need a patch from pre2 - 0.9.5 ?
Is there anybody else
On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 21:07:28 +0200, Ron wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Boris Koenig schrieb:
Ron Lange wrote:
Thank you Durk! I hope that someone is making a patch of the final
base package soon...;-)
Just to get this straight: you'd need a patch from pre2 - 0.9.5 ?
Is
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
Erik
(Ever used the bicycle to cycle up a steep hill?)
..is overhang steep enough? ;-)
On a bicycle?
Erik
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Jon Stockill wrote:
Erik Hofman wrote:
My personal opinion would be to get everything at one place,
preferably (but not necessarily) in a separate CVS branch at
flightgear.org just like the world wide scenery right now. That would
be easiest for everybody (and provides mirror sites).
That
Erik Hofman wrote:
Jon Stockill wrote:
Erik Hofman wrote:
My personal opinion would be to get everything at one place,
preferably (but not necessarily) in a separate CVS branch at
flightgear.org just like the world wide scenery right now. That would
be easiest for everybody (and provides mirror
On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 16:11:29 +0100
Vivian Meazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I downloaded FGFS cvs this morning. There appears to be an error in
gui.nas:
166 if(cap 1) { continue; }
I assume this to be a typo or corruption. I guess that it should be
166 if(cap = 0.1) { continue; }
On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 22:44:19 +0200, Erik wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
Erik
(Ever used the bicycle to cycle up a steep hill?)
..is overhang steep enough? ;-)
On a bicycle?
..yup. Classic case of _find_-a-way and stay-_off_-the-brakes
to pull G's, but
I'll have the Red Hat/Fedora packages available in the
next day or so.
On Sat, 2004-07-31 at 00:36, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
The official v0.9.5 source tarball and base package is now up on the ftp
sites and I've updated the website as well. I plan to email out an
official announcement later
Did someone already do a CYgWin build?
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
28 matches
Mail list logo
