[Flightgear-devel] Re: nimitz ai model : solid material, versus yasim jsb

2005-04-30 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Alex Romosan -- Saturday 30 April 2005 00:43: [JSBSim groundcache() patch] i strongly second committing the patches to cvs (and the fa-18, of course). As far as I've understood: the former doesn't make sense at the moment, and the latter is impossible. 1. JSBSim is not maintained in fgfs'

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: RFC: Eliminating jitter

2005-04-30 Thread Mathias Fröhlich
On Freitag 29 April 2005 16:40, Erik Hofman wrote: Jim Wilson wrote: From: Erik Hofman As the last writer/rewriter of the viewer (and therefore partly responsible for the bug being there) I probably should look at it, but it will be a few days yet. This is too good to wait on and it

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: nimitz ai model : solid material, versus yasim jsb

2005-04-30 Thread Mathias Fröhlich
On Freitag 29 April 2005 22:36, ghours wrote: from where is it possible to get these patches ? I did find anything in JSBSim CVs Yes, but there was a propblem with the standalone version of JSBSim. Jon completely reverted these patches within a few hours. The fix and the job to check that back

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: nimitz ai model : solid material, versus yasim jsb

2005-04-30 Thread Mathias Fröhlich
On Freitag 29 April 2005 22:58, Melchior FRANZ wrote: * ghours -- Friday 29 April 2005 22:36: [ground cache for JSBSim] Yes the patches are welcome . from where is it possible to get these patches ? ftp://ftp.uni-duisburg.de/FlightGear/Misc_maf/carrier/ You only need the JSBSim diff

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: nimitz ai model : solid material, versus yasim jsb

2005-04-30 Thread Mathias Fröhlich
On Samstag 30 April 2005 01:00, Melchior FRANZ wrote: 1. JSBSim is not maintained in fgfs' cvs, but JSBSim's own cvs. It's only regularly copied over to our cvs, so the patch applied here would repeatedly get overwritten. And applying it in JSBSim cvs is currently not a good idea

RE: [Flightgear-devel] Re: nimitz ai model : solid material, versus yasim jsb

2005-04-30 Thread Jon Berndt
You only need the JSBSim diff (and the FA18, of course :-). I don't know it the diff does still apply, though. (It's Mathias' work, not mine.) The diff still applies, since JSBSim is developed elsewhere. Erik usually moves changes from JSBSim to flightgear before a release of fg. Until

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: nimitz ai model : solid material, versus yasim jsb

2005-04-30 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sat, 30 Apr 2005 11:25:36 +0200, Mathias wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Samstag 30 April 2005 01:00, Melchior FRANZ wrote: 1. JSBSim is not maintained in fgfs' cvs, but JSBSim's own cvs. It's only regularly copied over to our cvs, so the patch applied here would

[Flightgear-devel] Error compiling FlightGear

2005-04-30 Thread Ampere K. Hardraade
I've just upgraded SimGear, but I was getting the following errors when I was trying to compile FlightGear today: localhost:/usr/local/src/FlightGear-0.9.8# make Making all in tests make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/FlightGear-0.9.8/tests' if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.

[Flightgear-devel] visual smoothing of model in fgfs?

2005-04-30 Thread Jeff Koppe
I'm working on my 2nd incarnation of a 1911 Wright EX for fgfs. All this after upgrading operating system, fgfs, etc, etc. Now, in fgfs my model seems to be much more faceted than I recall the first one (which, of course, I no longer have). I faintly recall seeing a discussion somewhere about