Re: [Flightgear-devel] RFC: Radios and Instrumentation

2003-01-29 Thread James Turner
On Wednesday, January 29, 2003, at 03:18 pm, David Megginson wrote: With the move, I'm also considering cleaning up the radio code a bit, and introducing better lags for the ADF and VOR needles (they're a little too snappy right now). Just one thing : when I get to the KLN-89b, I'm going to

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FW: Cygwin Build problems

2003-01-29 Thread James Turner
On Wednesday, January 29, 2003, at 02:43 pm, Curtis L. Olson wrote: SimGear/FlightGear configure used to automatically add /usr/local/lib to the library search path. That was removed because apparently it causes gcc-3.2 to gripe? Someone needs to explain the gcc-3.2 problem so that we can get

Re: [Flightgear-devel] DAFIF / Robin Peel's data

2003-01-28 Thread James Turner
On Tuesday, January 28, 2003, at 12:18 am, David Megginson wrote: First, forget the native fixed-field DAFIF format and go for DAFIFT -- it's the same stuff in a simple tab-delimited format. This single fact alone has saved me an enormous amount of hassle, the tab-delimited format is infinit

[Flightgear-devel] DAFIF / Robin Peel's data

2003-01-27 Thread James Turner
So, I am on the verge of 'snapping' with respect to our current aeronautical data, and am wondering how to proceed. I was looking at what at other software does for their aeronautical data, and most of the FS2k2 ones I know about are getting their data from: http://www.navdata.at/ Now, those d

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Partially Offtopic: Help open up the FSD protocol

2003-01-27 Thread James Turner
On Monday, January 27, 2003, at 01:27 pm, Michael Basler wrote: Neither my flying skills nor my spare time are sufficient for taking part in Vatsim :-( Me too ... However, I know that there are a few competiting networks a la Vatsim present or just emerging and I read several quite sharp d

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FMC / GPSs

2003-01-26 Thread James Turner
On Sunday, January 26, 2003, at 08:47 pm, Norman Vine wrote: You are aware of these http://www.ibiblio.org/fplan/ http://www.ibiblio.org/fplan/avdbtools/guide.html and FlyWay at http://www.bellz.org/progs.html Ah, I'm aware of things like them, but I guess my terminology is wrong. What I'm

[Flightgear-devel] FMC / GPSs [ was End of /steam approaches]

2003-01-26 Thread James Turner
On Sunday, January 26, 2003, at 05:12 pm, Norman Vine wrote: Hopefully we can now actually start implementing a realistic 'navigation computer', as is present in most modern GPS units and autopilots that, since the hopefully the AP is no longer dependent on hardwired to steamed input from C1

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGNavList searching

2003-01-26 Thread James Turner
On Saturday, January 25, 2003, at 09:55 pm, Curtis L. Olson wrote: I made some changes to the FGNavList class, take a look and see if it will work better for your needs. Thanks, I already saw this and picked it up, it works great! I'd done the research (okay, 2 minutes with grep) to see who t

[Flightgear-devel] FGNavList searching

2003-01-25 Thread James Turner
Hey, I've hit a slight problem trying to use FGNavList::findByIdent, in that it's calling onto the helper function findNavFromList, which does VOR range calculations to cut-off results. For what I need, I'm perfectly happy to deal navaids which are out of range of the supplied position, but be

[Flightgear-devel] Missing FGCondition.h

2003-01-24 Thread James Turner
My Linux and OS-X builds (cvs updated today) are both failing in FDM/JSBSim/FGSwitch.cpp, because FGCondition.h is not found ... a missing cvs add? H&H James -- We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars. ___ Flightgear-devel

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Displaced thresholds

2003-01-18 Thread James Turner
That looks pretty similar to what I've been aiming for (screenshot of current progress at http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/~eazdluf/taxidraw.jpg - and yes I know its currently windoze only - its just a fast prototype proof-of-concept and I'll port it to a multiplatform toolkit if it works). It woul

Re: [Flightgear-devel] KSFO International Terminal

2003-01-18 Thread James Turner
On Saturday, January 18, 2003, at 12:44 am, David Megginson wrote: Michael Basler writes: as an interim report, the guy with the FS98 add-on KSFO scenery did not answer until now (but mail did not bounce either). I'll stay tuned, but doubt he will... it's just been so long ago and he did ne

Re: [Flightgear-devel] main.cxx: glXGetProcAddressARB undeclared, and warnings

2003-01-04 Thread James Turner
On Saturday, January 4, 2003, at 05:01 pm, Curtis L. Olson wrote: Carsten Hoefer writes: Am Sam, 2003-01-04 um 00.19 schrieb Julian Foad: That works for me, adding it just before the #include, like this: #define GLX_GLXEXT_PROTOTYPES #include However, defining internal symbols like

Re: [Flightgear-devel] ATC Sound

2002-12-23 Thread James Turner
On Monday, December 23, 2002, at 02:14 pm, David Megginson wrote: Hmm. I wonder what the issue is. At 10, I can hear, perhaps, 75% of it over the idling engine, but I still have to strain to make it out. I don't know enough about the audio side to troubleshoot this easily. I would just lik

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Mac OS X 0.9.1 build available

2002-12-14 Thread James Turner
On Saturday, December 14, 2002, at 08:20 pm, darrell.l.walisser.1 wrote: I would like to get joystick support included soon (this would involve working on PLIB). Is anyone else already working on this? I am about to, by porting Max Horn's work in SDL to plib. I've got as far as reading over

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: ld: Undefined symbols error linking fgfs 0.9.1

2002-12-08 Thread James Turner
On Sunday, December 8, 2002, at 04:15 am, Andy Ross wrote: David Drum wrote: > I am compiling FG 0.9.1 on Mac OS X. > > ld: Undefined symbols: > _CPSEnableForegroundOperation > _CPSGetCurrentProcess > _CPSSetFrontProcess > _CPSSetProcessName > > [...] > I sent this to flightgear-users a couple

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Blender Status

2002-11-13 Thread James Turner
On Wednesday, November 13, 2002, at 07:16 pm, Gene Buckle wrote: Wouldn't it just be easier to allow the user to configure how they'd like the aircraft lists presented? The model file can indicate aircraft details such as licence requirements, operation category, etc. The user could then co

Re: [Flightgear-devel] building models

2002-10-31 Thread James Turner
On Thursday, October 31, 2002, at 02:22 pm, David Megginson wrote: Absolutely, though I wouldn't call it a complex structure (four polys). It will look a little silly without the surrounding tall buildings, though. This got me thinking. The dynamic scenery can place arbitrary models, so pre

Panel interaction (was Re: [Flightgear-devel] ADF change?)

2002-10-26 Thread James Turner
On Saturday, October 26, 2002, at 02:23 am, David Megginson wrote: Curtis L. Olson writes: What would be really useful when you get into modeling push buttons is to be able to model a switch where it is "true" while the mouse is depressed and then immediately returns to false when the mouse b

Re: [Flightgear-devel] JavaScript!

2002-06-28 Thread James Turner
A couple of comments on the scripting issue: JavaScript is a really nice language, but you aren't going to get a very small runtime without losing useful things (like regular expressions). However, the sources are readily available, as has already been noted. My day job is working with Mozilla bas

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Capturing warnings

2002-06-25 Thread James Turner
On Tuesday, June 25, 2002, at 01:31 am, Andy Ross wrote: > Jonathan Polley wrote: >> I cannot redirect stderr via 'command 2> file' on my Mac, so the easy >> solution was out. I did find that the following command works: > > Rubbish. Sure you can. You just have to run a real shell. :) > > S

Re: [Flightgear-devel] ANN: SGPropertyChangeListener

2002-06-18 Thread James Turner
On Tuesday, June 18, 2002, at 02:38 am, David Megginson wrote: > > The node argument is as follows: > > 1. If the value of an existing property node has been modified, it is >the node itself. > > 2. If a property has been added or removed, it is the property's >parent. Hmm, how is the l

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Autopilot planning [was RE: progress]

2002-06-14 Thread James Turner
On Friday, June 14, 2002, at 04:19 am, Jim Wilson wrote: > Armed vs. Active modes: > Active modes are the only ones that affect control surfaces. Armed > modes > select an impending active mode that may or may not get triggered, > depending > on if the condition for that mode is satisfied.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Autopilot planning [was RE: progress]

2002-06-11 Thread James Turner
On Tuesday, June 11, 2002, at 02:27 pm, Jim Wilson wrote: > If I'm not mistaken (and I easily could be) the FMC would usually just > feed > the autopilot heading and speed data when using non-radio-stack "NAV" > modes. > The FMC monitors the course and the AP only needs to follow the > comma

[Flightgear-devel] Autopilot planning [was RE: progress]

2002-06-11 Thread James Turner
On Tuesday, June 11, 2002, at 02:34 am, Jim Wilson wrote: > Not a problem...give me a day or two to get things together. Probably > there > won't be as much changed as there will be added, but some of the > "settings" > need to be exposed in the property tree. yeah, this is basically what I

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: progress

2002-06-10 Thread James Turner
ahOn Mon, 2002-06-10 at 15:58, Jim Wilson wrote: > James Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > (I want to get the flight-plans hooked up to the existing > > auto-pilot code, which isn't really designed to look like a 'big jet' > > model of

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: progress

2002-06-10 Thread James Turner
On Monday, June 10, 2002, at 05:35 am, John Wojnaroski wrote: > Well, I've been working on a Multi-function Control Display Unit (MCDU) > which connects to the FMC and > provides manual control of the nav receivers and other aircraft systems. > Next major effort is adding ability to > insert an

RE: [Flightgear-devel] HSIs

2002-06-07 Thread James Turner
On Fri, 2002-06-07 at 23:45, Norman Vine wrote: > FWIW > crosstrack error on a 'spherical earth' was computed in 'some' > navigation instruments long before 'digital' computers were used > in these devices. > < trig values for an angle can be determined from an 'analog' device > and the re

Re: [Flightgear-devel] HSIs

2002-06-07 Thread James Turner
On Fri, 2002-06-07 at 22:42, Curtis L. Olson wrote: > You are in luck. :-) Hmm, I'm quite worried that my brain didn't register that this instrument was an HSI (given that I've used the 310 and DC-3 quite a bit). I think maybe I've been using (virtual) digital HSIs too much, and forgot they can

[Flightgear-devel] HSIs

2002-06-07 Thread James Turner
As a result of playing with with routes / flight plans, one thing I forsee in the future is driving navigation instruments from a non-radio source (i.e something like the NAV / GPS toggle which I'm led to believe is common in many GA craft with a GPS fitted). Now, the problem is that such systems

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Parsing Lon/lat strings

2002-06-05 Thread James Turner
On Tuesday, June 4, 2002, at 01:22 am, Andy Ross wrote: > > Heh, that actually sounded kinda fun, so I tried it. Here's the > smallest parser for your syntax that I could come up with, in good old > obfuscatorial C style. It sits pleasingly close to the line between > elegance and perversity.

[Flightgear-devel] Parsing Lon/lat strings

2002-06-03 Thread James Turner
Further to my flight plan hacking (which is coming along nicely): Is there any code in Sim/FlightGear to do generic conversion of a lat / lon string into a decimal degree value? I.e, something that would accept and convert some / all of the following: N50 23.1 -96.32 E00 06.3 into a sign-corre

Re: [Flightgear-devel] VSI units mismatch panel/steam

2002-06-03 Thread James Turner
On Mon, 2002-06-03 at 03:18, Curtis L. Olson wrote: > Cockpit/steam.cxx exports "/steam/vertical-speed-fpm" and ties it to > FGSteam::get_VSI_fps > > It seems like there is a mismatch here between fpsecond and fpminute. > > The fdm exports "/velocities/vertical-speed-fps" aka climb_rate. > >

[Flightgear-devel] Routes / Flight-plans

2002-06-02 Thread James Turner
Following some recent bad experiences with commercial simulators, and the prospect of simulating (from an FDM perspective) a modern jet in FlightGear, I am planning to work on some features which might eventually let me use FG for the stuff I enjoy flying. As a starting point, there are a few inf

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Autopilot climb modes

2002-05-29 Thread James Turner
[I assume Thomas will reply anyway, but I want to check I have this right (from using the PMDG 757/767/777s which are supposed to be just about the most accurate systems models out there)] On Wednesday, May 29, 2002, at 02:23 pm, Jim Wilson wrote: > > So if in SPD mode the selected speed was

[Flightgear-devel] Autopilot climb modes

2002-05-29 Thread James Turner
On Wednesday, May 29, 2002, at 04:06 am, Alex Perry wrote: >>> Just something to file away ... big jets should have a climb mode in >>> which the power is regulated to max climb by the autothrottles and >>> speed >>> is held with the pitch control. Is this the mode activated by the CLB / CON

[Flightgear-devel] yasim solution issues

2002-05-26 Thread James Turner
Just noting that the YAsim 747 gets a solution failure for me (updated 15 minutes ago). The DC3 works great now, however, except that the VSI seems to be reporting bogus values (it sits at the maximum climb rate stop). [tries to test the yasim c310 to see if the VSI thing is a panel bug..] Hmm,

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Virtual cockpit notes

2002-03-10 Thread James Turner
On Sat, 2002-03-09 at 22:08, Jim Wilson wrote: > Fly! uses a 3D cockpit. They use 2D for most of the instrumentation, switches > and knobs, and 3D models for the things that really need it like levers. More > than likely the legability problem is your LCD at 1600x1200 ;-) In any case > we'd be

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Problem report on release 0.7.9

2002-02-23 Thread James Turner
On Fri, 2002-02-22 at 20:52, Curtis L. Olson wrote: > > > This may or may not be related but when I start up at an airport for > > which i have no scenery, the elevation is below 0. At EHAM it is > > -17 ft as shown in /position/altitude-ft. > > Actually, when an ocean tile is automatically ge

<    1   2