2006/11/16, Magus [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In some areas you're simply requested to do a low approach before the
final landing - in order to scare the kettle on the runway off
We don't have any unruly kitchen appliances here, but the livestock
tends towards beefalow (Bison x Beef) rather
Hi,
I'm catching up with you guys in Mac OS X build for cvs-head / OSG,
and built it successfully.
I did a test fly and I recognized some issues that are shown at wiki
page (2x slower, no 3d clouds - even noisy clouds),
which I guess it seems OK at this moment.
The thing is there're some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tatsuhiro Nishioka wrote:
Source files that I used were:
FlightGear: cvs-head (as of yesterday)
PLIB-1.8.4
OpenSceneGraph: CVS-20061113
SimGear: CVS-head (as of yesterday), which I check out with cvs -
d :pserver:[EMAIL
Tatsuhiro Nishioka wrote:
Source files that I used were:
FlightGear: cvs-head (as of yesterday)
PLIB-1.8.4
OpenSceneGraph: CVS-20061113
SimGear: CVS-head (as of yesterday), which I check out with cvs -
d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/cvs/SimGear-0.3 co source
data: 0.9.10 data
Always
On Nov 16, 2006, at 4:57 AM, Stefan Seifert wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tatsuhiro Nishioka wrote:
Source files that I used were:
FlightGear: cvs-head (as of yesterday)
PLIB-1.8.4
OpenSceneGraph: CVS-20061113
SimGear: CVS-head (as of yesterday), which I check out
Vadym Kukhtin wrote:
I see this almost my 2nd flight (guess where)
http://img135.imageshack.us/img135/8718/fgfsscreen031hj1.jpg
I wonder how tall a fence you need to keep them off the field?
Josh
-
Take Surveys. Earn
Oops my wrong. I tried both 0.9.10 and cvs-head data.
I tried the 0.9.10 since using cvs data, which I got as tarball at
http://cvs.flightgear.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/viewcvs.cgi/data/?
cvsroot=FlightGear-0.9only_with_tag=HEAD, resulting the same + some
missing files, so I tried 0.9.10.
OKay, I
Hi,
Well, I think the problem is based on OSG - Detlef's
F4U has got the same problem.
Greetings
HHS
--- Martin Spott [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Mathias Fr?hlich wrote:
On Thursday 16 November 2006 00:34, Georg
Vollnhals wrote:
2.b
Mathias created a new FAA conform security
Hi,
So, now I got the OSG-version from yesterday for
microsoft compiled with WINCVS.
What should I say which isn't said before - framerates
about 10 % under the plib-version. But they are more
stables than than the plib-version.
I got the same problems heliflyer mentioned with the
Seneca on the
Hi,
So, now I got the OSG-version from yesterday for
microsoft compiled with WINCVS.
What should I say which isn't said before - framerates
about 10 % under the plib-version. But they are more
stables than than the plib-version.
I got the same problems heliflyer mentioned with the
Seneca on the
Hi Maik,
It looks like I completely overlooked your message yesterday. I've been
playing with your idea a bit. Some more comments below.
On Wednesday 15 November 2006 19:53, Maik Justus wrote:
Hi,
I built a version with debug info only for this file and got, as
expected, normal performance.
Hi all,
just to explain that it is a bad day today to answer to your replies - I
had to work for 15 hours today, just coming home and still on duty (on
call) for the night until tomorrow, the mobile phone is my enemy now!
So in short:
1. ghost aircraft
As also HHS pointed out, this must be an
From: Tatsuhiro Nishioka
Hi,
I'm catching up with you guys in Mac OS X build for cvs-head / OSG,
and built it successfully.
I did a test fly and I recognized some issues that are shown at wiki
page (2x slower, no 3d clouds - even noisy clouds),
which I guess it seems OK at this
On Nov 16, 2006, at 4:15 PM, flightgear-devel-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Georg Vollnhals wrote:
http://home.arcor.de/vollnhals-bremen/OSGTst/fgfs-screen-042.jpg
http://home.arcor.de/vollnhals-bremen/OSGTst/fgfs-screen-044.jpg
When you crash the bo105, you get a cow. When you crash the
From: Tatsuhiro Nishioka
So here's the question.
Any suggestion about the place I can post it?
Should or Could I join the FG Mac OS X project?
Is it just about storing a single file ?
I also need (and want) to release the patches and Xcode project files
for this because I
Mathias Fröhlich wrote
It would still be interesting why we get consistently bad performance
reports
on win32 and most unix users report equal to much better performance...
It certainly would. My system comprises a P4 2.8 with .5 Gb RAM and a
recently purchased nVidia FX 6200 with 256 Mb
Hi Jim,
I'm making diff + Xcode project files (only project files, which
does't contain any source files) for both 0.9.10 release and
cvs-head (as of yesterday). I'm willing to write a document how to
build 0.9.10 / cvs-head.
I can post those files and docs on Mac OS X FlightGear site and/or
Can't reproduce this problem under FG-osg either.
Unless I've screwed something up, this morning I got the same issue
with FG-osg as well. Anyone using NVIDIA 9629 can test this?
Pigeon.
-
Take Surveys. Earn
Hi,
I noticed 3D cockpit instruments (I tried C172p's and 747's) seems
to be scaled depending on the size of the window.
This is most obvious if I change the FOV to the maximum (120) using
the 'X' key. If I resize FG's window so that its width is much larger
than its height (say,
Hi,
confirmed. I got this artefacts too. But this happens since today after I
have recompiled everything (FlightGear-, SimGear-CVS and PLIB-SVN from 16
November, as the new OSG version of Mathias).
Matthias
On Friday 17 November 2006 00:14, Pigeon wrote:
Can't reproduce this problem
Hi Durk,
while trying to analyze the crash I got to the conviction, that the call
stack is wrong and points not to the right position (there are some
inconsistencies in the call stack). I think this is due to the missing
debug information in the system libraries. I try to get the error with
Hi
I have checked out the latest CVS version of OpenSceneGraph and am
having compilation issues.
I have built the latest CVS versions of OpenThreads and Producer
successfully, however when I build OSG, I get the following error.
I am running Slamd64, an x86_64 version of Slackware, with
So my questions:
1. Am I right to be concerned about this?
Yes. Contact eBay immediately.
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
Curtis Olson wrote:
Someone just directed me to the following ebay vendor selling FlightGear.
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/Realistic-Professional-Aviation-Flight-Simulator_W0QQitemZ260053619883QQihZ016QQcategoryZ80336QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
At first glance I thought, no big deal, just another person
Whether it violates the GPL is a matter for discussion. IMHO, it's skirting
pretty close to the line. I didn't see any notice of the GPL or some of the
finer points of it, in the offering. I believe that should be plainly
visible. More concerning to me is that the offering is misleading, and from
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 22:11:43 -0600, Jon wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
So my questions:
1. Am I right to be concerned about this?
Yes. Contact eBay immediately.
..and http://groklaw.net/ , _after_ we hear they got him. ;o)
..OT: can you guys confirm Groklaw.net's IP? I
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 22:02:22 -0600, Curtis wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Someone just directed me to the following ebay vendor selling
FlightGear.
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/Realistic-Professional-Aviation-Flight-Simulator_W0QQitemZ260053619883QQihZ016QQcategoryZ80336QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 23:36:20 -0600
Jon S. Berndt wrote:
Whether it violates the GPL is a matter for discussion. IMHO, it's
skirting pretty close to the line.
What are the specific subsections of the GPL that look to you like
they may be being violated here? What is the line that it's close
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 23:36:20 -0600, Jon wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Whether it violates the GPL is a matter for discussion. IMHO, it's
skirting pretty close to the line. I didn't see any notice of the GPL
or some of the finer points of it, in the offering. I believe that
should be
On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 08:02:10 +0100
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
..in courts, this is known as fraud, and copyright infringement:
You do harm to the cause of free software by throwing accusations like
this around without backing them up. Again, please be specific: what
specific subsections of the GPL
30 matches
Mail list logo
