Re: [Flightgear-devel] CMake, tomorrow (Sunday 23rd)

2011-10-25 Thread Adrian Musceac
On Monday, October 24, 2011 16:53:23 James Turner wrote: Mathias' suggestion also works, BTW - specify CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH, with one (or several) paths to search - I tested that this morning and updated the README. As you guessed, manually setting the the detection variables

Re: [Flightgear-devel] CMake, tomorrow (Sunday 23rd)

2011-10-25 Thread James Turner
On 25 Oct 2011, at 09:39, Adrian Musceac wrote: Hi James, and thanks for updating the readme. I may be blind or just stupid, but I can't find a way of setting CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH in KDevelop that works. Adding it to environment variables does not do anything, and cmake fails to find the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Fgpanel and ubuntu 11.10 build linking failed on libz, solved.

2011-10-25 Thread Andreas Gaeb
Am 24.10.2011 13:08, schrieb James Turner: [...] Also, there is something configuration dependent happening here, since other people have reported a similar issue (also with Ubuntu 11) on IRC, but I don't see the issue on my Ubuntu install. Anyone else seeing this problem (on any other

[Flightgear-devel] Aircraft split

2011-10-25 Thread syd adams
Hi . Though it appears to have it's drawbacks , from a selfish point of view ,the split makes work here much easier. Thanks again. Just another (possibly useless) idea . What about adding a text/xml file of all available aircraft , or even an aircraft.dat file,somewhere in fgdata? I haven't

Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgdata: Important note

2011-10-25 Thread AJ MacLeod
On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 00:18:36 +0200 HB-GRAL flightg...@sablonier.ch wrote: Hi Core (and the rest of the entire organism of course) Why not splitting up the Aircraft folder into hangars as collection of aircrafts as plug-ins, collection of big teams or small but heavy industries ? IMHO that

Re: [Flightgear-devel] CMake, tomorrow (Sunday 23rd)

2011-10-25 Thread Geoff McLane
On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 14:53 +0100, James Turner wrote: On 24 Oct 2011, at 13:17, Geoff McLane wrote: In my case I like to be able to compile against different versions of say OSG - like - OSG301=1# stable release 3.0.1 - default OSG283=0# general release 283 -

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Enabling HLA - missing RTI.hh

2011-10-25 Thread Mathias Fröhlich
On Monday, October 24, 2011 22:12:15 Martin Spott wrote: George Patterson wrote: Btw, Berlios is closing on 31/12/2011 so grab what you need now. I am not sure if Mathias has moved the above project to another host. I'm sure Mathias will speak about the details himself, but aside from

[Flightgear-devel] OpenRTI git repository

2011-10-25 Thread Mathias Fröhlich
Hi, Some of you have already noticed that berlios is closing at the end of the year. So OpenRTI needs to find a new home. I have recently just changed my upstream repository to git://gitorious.org/openrti/openrti.git This is not a full replacement for the berlios site, but currently at

Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgdata: Important note

2011-10-25 Thread Heiko Schulz
Hello, IMHO that adds another not very logical layer of complication for little gain. There's a nice democratic aspect to every aircraft being in a single central repository, and reduced opportunities for those clique type groups that so naturally spring up and are divisive and very

Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgdata: Important note

2011-10-25 Thread Gijs de Rooy
Hi, good to see some more factual discussions. Let me emphasize that anyone is welcome to add/edit concerns/questions/answers/solution to the wiki: http://wiki.flightgear.org/FlightGear_Git:_splitting_fgdata Those who have commit rights are already busy with their own stuff. For a new

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FW: Skydome and Terrain shader with haze - some helprequired

2011-10-25 Thread Mathias Fröhlich
Hi, On Monday, October 24, 2011 10:27:11 thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi wrote: My understanding is that * the vertex shader computes stuff for each vertex Yes. If I don't use a fragment shader (as e.g. in the 3dclouds), things like shading get a linear interpolation between vertices. You need to

Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgdata: Important note

2011-10-25 Thread Heiko Schulz
Hello, there was little input on the fgdata split and few people speaking up when things were started. We do see a lot of responses now - many being in favor of the change, but also concerns about remaining issues. Indeed, setting up the new repo isn't as simple as it seemed initially, and

Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgdata: Important note

2011-10-25 Thread Gijs de Rooy
On the other side clone each of the 300+ aircraft isn't that comfortable as well. There are various ways to tackle that problem. One could write a script to clone/pull all the aircraft with a single click, but an even nicer solution might be to use submodules, as mentioned at the wiki

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Aircraft split

2011-10-25 Thread James Turner
On 25 Oct 2011, at 14:30, syd adams wrote: I haven't thought it out too deeply , but maybe in this format : Aircraft: Citation-X Author: Syd Licence: GPL URL: git clone or download url Splash: path/url to thumbnail It would be up to the aircraft developers to fill it in and maintain

[Flightgear-devel] Terragear now sans plib

2011-10-25 Thread Christian Schmitt
Hi there, maybe you have noticed some exceptionally high activity in recent days/weeks on the Terragear repo. Well, there is one particular reason for it: It now supports the cmake build system and, as of today, does no longer depend on plib. These changes are not yet in the master tree, but

Re: [Flightgear-devel] CMake, tomorrow (Sunday 23rd)

2011-10-25 Thread James Turner
On 25 Oct 2011, at 15:20, Geoff McLane wrote: need to see the arguments / environment passed to CMake, to understand why. But in each case I have explicitly given you the exact exports and cmake commands used... What more do you need? The problem is you've confused me, with all the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Aircraft split

2011-10-25 Thread syd adams
Oh good. I figured someone would be way ahead of me :) Cheers On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:32 AM, James Turner zakal...@mac.com wrote: On 25 Oct 2011, at 14:30, syd adams wrote: I haven't thought it out too deeply , but maybe in this format : Aircraft: Citation-X Author: Syd Licence: GPL

Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgdata: Important note

2011-10-25 Thread HB-GRAL
Am 25.10.11 19:09, schrieb syd adams: I dont personally see any advantage myself, I'd have to vote no.Sorry Yves. -- The demand for IT networking professionals continues to grow, and the demand for specialized