http://onewayauto.altervista.org/ycf2x5.php?s=ot
--
Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer
Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013
and get the hardware for free! Learn more.
modified to make sure that these reports are only issued in standalone mode.
Thank you for your feedback Anders.
Bertrand.
2013/1/12 Bertrand Coconnier bcoco...@gmail.com
Hi Torsten,
I just created a merge request for syncing FlightGear with JSBSim prior to
the release 2.10 https://gitorious.org
Hi Torsten,
I just created a merge request for syncing FlightGear with JSBSim prior to
the release 2.10 https://gitorious.org/fg/flightgear/merge_requests/40
I hope it is no already too late...
Bertrand
2013/1/6 Torsten Dreyer tors...@t3r.de
Hi JSBSim and FlightGear lists,
should we sync
2012/9/23 Alan Teeder ajtee...@v-twin.org.uk:
The reason I quoted 10 Gb is that my fgdate/.git/objects directory is
currently 8.9Gb, and I assumed that is what gets downloaded during a clone.
I bow to your wisdom if you say that it is only 4.9Gb.
I have the same size than Martin. For that I
Hi all,
Just to let you know that Jon fixed a bug in JSBSim that affected the
tank inertia calculations. I think it is worth updating both 2.8.0 and
2.9.0
The fix has been applied on the file
src/FDM/JSBSim/models/FGPropulsion.cpp and is available on JSBSim CVS
repository.
Regards,
Bertrand.
2012/7/9 Renk Thorsten thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi wrote:
b) You do not read carefully what I write.
[...followed by 7878 signs. Wow !!! ]
Action plan for recovery :
1. Go straight to the point (actionee: Thorsten R.)
2. Write much shorter e-mails (actionee: Thorsten R.)
3. Read Thorsten's e-mails
2012/7/1 ThorstenB bre...@gmail.com:
Am 30.06.2012 15:02, schrieb Bertrand Coconnier:
I don't know if it's only me, but all my efforts to match sg/fg/fgdata
version were unsuccessful until I manually deleted
src/Include/version.h in flightgear.
After a complete rebuild and installation
2012/6/26 ThorstenB bre...@gmail.com:
(The version change was pushed to sg/fg/fgdata consistently. If you get
a version mismatch, make sure you have pulled all three repos, rebuilt
and _installed_ sg + fg. If you still get a version mismatch, try a
clean build - and _install_.)
I don't know
2012/4/22 Renk Thorsten thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi:
After the last related discussion, I've really been thinking a while if I
should bring this up again or not. I don't want to annoy people just for the
sake of it, I know open source development is often a thankless task in which
one
2012/2/23 Martin Spott martin.sp...@mgras.net:
Apparently I've been too ambitious and idealistic. I know that
voluntary OpenSource development is primarily ego-driven, but there's a
strong indication that I've still under-estimated the average Scenery-
developers narcism: Scenery development
2011/12/23 Jon S. Berndt jonsber...@comcast.net:
Also, I guess we should have some discussion on where the official version
of some JSBSim aircraft should reside. I think I'll be culling some models
from the JSBSim distribution - models that have been untouched for a long
time. I'd like to
17 septembre 2011 15:42:02, Bertrand Coconnier a écrit :
2011/9/17 grth_team grtht...@gmail.com:
Hi, Bertrand,
We have tried out the first patch, it does work.
Thus, the reset working, help to explain ( partly ) the wrong
position of Aircraft at start on Carrier.
At least with the case
2011/9/11 Erik Hofman e...@ehofman.com:
On Sun, 2011-09-11 at 12:13 +0200, Roland Häder wrote:
Hi,
with recent commit there have been changed CHMOD from 0644 to 0755 on
some files. Here is the full list I have seen:
I seem to recall this happened to me before, how does that happen?
I've
2011/9/11 Durk Talsma durkt...@gmail.com:
Which actually brings me to the next question: I'm currently trying to build
a heavily optimized version of FlightGear, and want to pass a number of
options cmake. I got the basic mechanism to work; i.e. -D
CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS=-O3 -Wall. But, in my
Hi Ron,
2011/8/16 Ron Jensen w...@jentronics.com:
I took a look at the YASim solver today, first comparing the Inertial tensor
with the inertias coming out of aeromatic. Not too far apart, but the 2 yasim
aircraft I looked at were both 50% higher than the aeromatic numbers.
Then I took a
2011/6/19 Hal V. Engel hven...@gmail.com:
On Saturday, June 18, 2011 08:00:41 PM Jon S. Berndt wrote:
From: syd adams [mailto:adams@gmail.com]
Does jsbsim ? I've just begun to look into it , so I don't really know
jsbsim's capabilities.
It's not automatic - not a natural
2011/6/19 Jon S. Berndt jonsber...@comcast.net:
Hal,
Oops! Sorry I attributed code to you that came from somewhere else. :-) I
now seem to recall experimenting with your model at that time - actually
replacing the older one in JSBSim cvs with yours, then adding the estimated
propwash
2011/6/19 Ron Jensen w...@jentronics.com:
On Saturday 18 June 2011 21:00:41 Jon S. Berndt wrote:
Here's an example from Hal's P-51D Mustang. This is from an old version, so
it may have changed by now, but it illustrates the approach. In the
aerodynamics section of the config file - but outside
2011/6/19 John Denker j...@av8n.com:
On 06/19/2011 06:46 AM, Jon S. Berndt wrote:
Maybe I've gone wrong somewhere here, but something similar might work.
Also, in situations like a flat spin or tail slide this probably falls
apart!
Let's postpone discussion of exotic flight conditions such
2011/6/17 Emilian Huminiuc emili...@gmail.com:
On Friday 17 June 2011 08:15:36 xsaint wrote:
Thank you Emilian and Buck
Ok i tested changing the location of the point to ahead of the engine
and also behind the engine, near exhaust.
Irrespective of the location, looking at the results at
2011/6/17 Gary Neely grne...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 12:17 AM, xsaint xsa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Folks...
Was wondering if any nice souls will assist clear this doubt on mine...
In YASIM, what does actionpt really refers to?
Is it the point the engines pull the air through?
2011/6/18 syd adams adams@gmail.com:
My more simple understanding was the actionpoint was the point where
thrust was applied relative to the engine mass , like the
documentation states.
an actionpt subelement
to place the action point of the thrust at a different
Hi,
A number of issues have been reported in the bug tracker #184 about
the capacity of JSBSim to take some command line arguments into
account. After investigating the subject, I found that several bugs
were involved in this issue:
1. The atmospheric properties of FG are not yet initialized
2011/4/15 ThorstenB bre...@gmail.com:
Ok, not sure what has changed there, but is it important enough to be
migrated to 2.2? I know it's tempting to make all the new features
available right now (I'd like to see my new TCAS in the release, we've
had 2 JSBSim updates, new HLA support, tank
2011/4/12 Durk Talsma durkt...@gmail.com:
Hi All,
after a slightly longer than expected break from FlightGear, I started
picking up coding again about a week or two ago. I am currently working
integrating the AIModels based traffic system with an ATC system in which the
user can also
Hi,
I could reproduce the bug on my computer as well.
There seems to be some confusion about what the
SetLongitude()/SetLatitude()/SetAltitude()/etc. do in
src/FDM/JSBSim/JSBSim.cxx. On one hand, they are obviously intended to
update the initial conditions (IC) of JSBSim. And, when the IC are
Thank you all for your responses. I now feel reassured that the Flight
Gear community has not lost its common sense.
Cheers,
Bertrand.
--
Free Software Download: Index, Search Analyze Logs and other IT data in
Hi all,
When I read this (for such a trivial change it looks very much like an
overreaction)
http://gitorious.org/fg/fgdata/commit/ad77bef24665b27539a07423cf7a199fa75a19b8#comment_42848
and that :
2011/2/23 Heiko Schulz aeitsch...@yahoo.de:
We had this dicussion already. Every developer has
2011/2/17 Tim Moore timoor...@gmail.com:
I've committed one more fix that should make things right on 2.8.3.
Tim
It works now with OSG 2.8.1 !
Thanks Tim.
Bertrand.
--
The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit:
My patch may not work for OSG =2.9 but the fact is that
_readerWriterOptions is also needed for SimGear to compile with OSG 2.8.1.
Cheers,
Bertrand
Le 16 févr. 2011 02:53, Frederic Bouvier fredfgf...@free.fr a écrit :
- Bertrand Coconnier a écrit :
2011/2/15 Tim Moore timoor
2011/2/15 Tim Moore timoor...@gmail.com:
I've checked in fixes for this change in osgDB:DatabasePager to the SimGear
and FlightGear next and releases/2.2.0 branches. Part of the delay resulted
from the fact that the Open Scene Graph change introduced a new bug; I have
waited until my patch for
Enough of that please.
I would be grateful if both of you AJ MacLeod and Alasdair ould stop
polluting everyone's mail box with your discussion.
Thank you very much.
Bertrand.
--
The ultimate all-in-one performance
Correct. JSBSim itself makes no distinction between ground materials (hence
the reason why some aircrafts are able to land on water). This can however
be managed with Nasal scripts. So I would say that this issue is likely
located in one of the C172 Nasal scripts.
Bertrand
Le 10 févr. 2011
2011/2/5 ThorstenB bre...@gmail.com:
On 05.02.2011 16:21, ThorstenB wrote:
I'm currently testing a different patch for the same issue: instead of
untieing all properties below the /fdm/jsbsim (only), I added a list
to JSBSim's FGPropertyManagager, so it keeps track of all the
properties it
2011/2/5 Jon S. Berndt jonsber...@comcast.net:
I'll have to go back and look at the [JSBSim] code again. I'd like to figure
out how to make resetting work better from the API - more naturally and
without having to reload the aircraft model. This would be useful for both
the JSBSim standalone
2011/1/30 Bertrand Coconnier bcoco...@gmail.com:
2011/1/29 Ron Jensen w...@jentronics.com:
+ double fuelDensity = Propulsion-GetTank(i)-GetDensity();
( ... )
+ Propulsion-GetTank(i)-GetContents() / fuelDensity);
Should we guard against GetDensity() returning 0?
Correct.
Please
2011/2/6 ThorstenB bre...@gmail.com:
Hi Betrand,
thanks for your patch. Only one comment on your patch though...
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Bertrand Coconnier bcoco...@gmail.com wrote:
* I would rather make tied_properties a list of SGPropertyNode* rather
than a list of strings (same
2011/2/6 Jon S. Berndt jonsber...@comcast.net:
Bertrand,
Is this patch supposed to be applied to JSBSim as it currently exists in
JSBSim CVS, or applied against the patch that Thorsten mentions?
It is supposed to be a Flight Gear patch and be applied against last
revision of git 'next'
2011/2/6 Erik Hofman e...@ehofman.com:
On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 07:56 -0600, Jon S. Berndt wrote:
2011/2/6 Jon S. Berndt jonsber...@comcast.net:
Bertrand,
Is this patch supposed to be applied to JSBSim as it currently exists
in
JSBSim CVS, or applied against the patch that Thorsten
2011/2/6 Torsten Dreyer tors...@t3r.de:
I am currently working on a more generic solution to the issue based on your
patch. Currently we have at least three different places within FlightGear
calculating tank contents and converting them between different units.
The idea is to have a
2011/2/6 Torsten Dreyer tors...@t3r.de:
I'm curently testing various aircraft on Windows and Linux and I hope to get
this commited later today.
Torsten,
I have checked your code and it breaks the previous behaviour for
JSBSim. Your code is overwriting JSBSim values during initialization,
I
2011/2/6 Torsten Dreyer tors...@t3r.de:
I tried the few JSBSim and YASim aircraft that I'm able to handle, please
report if I broke anything.
Have you read my previous e-mail ? I attached a patch because JSBSim
fuel calcs are broken (tested aircraft is p51d). All P51d tank
capacities, levels
2011/1/29 Ron Jensen w...@jentronics.com:
+ double fuelDensity = Propulsion-GetTank(i)-GetDensity();
( ... )
+ Propulsion-GetTank(i)-GetContents() / fuelDensity);
Should we guard against GetDensity() returning 0?
Correct.
Please find an updated version of the patch that uses the
Hi all,
Please find attached a patch that fixes bugs #47 and #184. It restores
functionality of command line arguments --vc, --roll-deg, --pitch-deg,
etc. Note also that this patch has also a positive side effect : it
restores functionality of the 'airspeed (kt)' cell of the 'Position
Aircraft in
2011/1/28 Hal V. Engel hven...@gmail.com:
A thread was opened on the forum about how the C172P appeared to be
incorrectly calculating the amount of fuel in gallons based on the weight of
the fuel. It appears that the conversion is using 6.6 lbs/gal when it should
be using something close to
A better improved patch that supersedes the previous FuelDensity.diff
I sent to this list.
This one takes /consumables/fuel/tank[n]/density-ppg into account in the calcs.
Cheers,
Bertrand.
2011/1/29 Bertrand Coconnier bcoco...@gmail.com:
2011/1/28 Hal V. Engel hven...@gmail.com:
A thread
Hi all,
I think I have a final bug fix for JSBSim reset issues (bug #204 and
#222). I have investigated James Turner's fix and tried to understand
why it fixes the issue in every case but for gliders.
NaNs (bug #222) were basically generated because the method
JSBSim::unbind() was not
2011/1/26 Erik Hofman e...@ehofman.com:
After a bit of discussion it was decided that the FlightGear/JSBSim glue
code in JSBSim.[ch]xx located in FlightGear/src/FDM/JSBSim now is
maintained by FlightGear developers instead of by JSBSim developers and
therefore these files will not be
2011/1/25 Vivian Meazza vivian.mea...@lineone.net:
and the vertical movement would
tend to unlatch aircraft on deck from the carrier.
Are you sure of that statement ? Can the carrier vertical speed be
higher than the speed of a falling object ?
My bet would be that the normal reaction forces
2010/11/28 Gijs de Rooy gijsr...@hotmail.com:
Hi all,
after updating fgdata from Gitorious this evening and installing the win32
nightly binary from
Hudson (28-nov-2010 7:00:55), JSBSim aircraft suddenly bounce, when at the
ground. Some
aircraft bounce more than others (747-400 and C172P
2010/11/28 Gijs de Rooy gijsr...@hotmail.com:
Yeah, problems is fixed! I had --model-hz=30. Setting it to 120 (so it
was omitted from the commandline by FGRun) fixed the problem.
(...snip...)
After takeoff, bouncing stops. After landing, bouncing continues.
When braking, the intensity of
2010/11/21 Tim Moore timoor...@gmail.com:
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 2:58 AM, Scott Hamilton
scott.hamil...@popplanet.biz wrote:
The important point here is that it has been nearly twelve months
since the last major release, the codebase appears to be looking
forward, and in the past it has
2010/10/17 Gijs de Rooy gijsr...@hotmail.com:
For example, the current FG747 wing flex is calculated on various thing, one
of which is the amount
of fuel in each wing section, but how much lift is required to contradict
this fuel-force?
Gijs,
The structural analysis of a wing is a very
2010/4/9 Stuart Buchanan stuar...@gmail.com:
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
Glad to see the effect is used. I noticed the bump is reverted on one axis.
In a previous thread, I wrote :
I use the GIMP normal map plug-in to create my normal maps. Here are two
example. A bump :
2010/4/13 Stuart Buchanan stuar...@gmail.com:
Bertrand wrote:
This is some nice artistic/graphical work indeed, however, I am afraid
this is not very realistic. If you want Cessna aerodynamicists to die
from an heart attack, just show them this picture ^_^
:)
I was basing the work on some
Hi all,
I am bit taken aback by this commit. Is it really where the Flight
Gear community wants to go ?
As far as I understand the GPL, it is legal to rename an application
as long as the renamed application is still under GPL. So what is this
commit intended for ? Furthermore, do you honestly
Let's say that I make a fork of Flight Gear by creating a new project
My Flight Simulator under SourceForge, that I make a mirror copy of
the Flight Gear CVS tree under my project and that the only commit I
do is to change the name of the program.
Then I release everything under the GPL.
After a
2009/10/24 Martin Spott martin.sp...@mgras.net:
Bertrand Coconnier wrote:
Your problem, since you're the one who distributes this piece of
software.
Nope see below.
which is obviously an illegal statement since :
1. My copy is perfectly compliant with the GPL
2. This statement
Hi Gene,
2009/5/15 Gene Buckle ge...@deltasoft.com:
The thrust reversers require that you go to idle power to engage them.
However, after that you can run the power back up.
This is a very interesting information. Thank you.
In the real aircraft
there is no indication that the reversers
Hi Heiko,
2009/5/15 Heiko Schulz aeitsch...@yahoo.de:
Hi,
Some time ago, I started to improve the 737-300. I let it stall: no times,
experiences I had with the development of the c172p and some personal things.
I have still a copy on my local system but give up development
There are some
Or may be the indication is only available on the more modern aircrafts ?
2009/5/17 Bertrand Coconnier bcoco...@gmail.com:
Hi Gene,
2009/5/15 Gene Buckle ge...@deltasoft.com:
The thrust reversers require that you go to idle power to engage them.
However, after that you can run the power
Hi all,
Not sure it is the right mailing list to post this but I have made a
patch to activate the reverse on the 737-300 of FlightGear.
I have seen on FG Wiki that David Culp and Innis Cunningham are the
authors of the 737 model so I have put Dave on copy of this e-mail.
However I do not know
62 matches
Mail list logo
