Heiko Schulz wrote:
You want to see another aircraft than the 777 because the fdm is not
realistic, but you don't want to see a chopper where the fdm is highly
realistic and already prooved by a real pilot.
At least two real-life pilots, BTW,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly -
As for the Dragonfly, the performance just seems unreal, thought I've
never flown on myself. I think we could replace it with the Dromader,
a much higher detail aircraft with a pretty extensively detailed FDM.
What part of the FDM do you think is unreal? Having flown the Dragonfly
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 09:29:05 -0600, Reagan wrote in message
4d63d641.7000...@gmail.com:
On 2/22/2011 8:35 AM, Gene Buckle wrote:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011, Gary Neely wrote:
Syd places an enormous amount of effort and care into his models.
If it were me, I'd think twice before questioning
You want to see another aircraft than the 777 because
the fdm is not
realistic, but you don't want to see a chopper where
the fdm is highly
realistic and already prooved by a real pilot.
At least two real-life pilots, BTW,
Martin.
I was only aware of one (LinuxTag)
--
From: Jack Mermod jackmer...@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 12:41 AM
To: Devel List flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Default Aircraft Candidates
I wasn't planning to get into an argument over
still in work: http://www.hoerbird.net/galerie.html
But already done: http://www.hoerbird.net/reisen.html
--- Jack Mermod jackmer...@gmail.com schrieb am Di, 22.2.2011:
Hi,
I wasn't planning to get into an
argument over the 777-200, but yes it
does have an unrealistic FDM.
See here:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011, Gary Neely wrote:
Syd places an enormous amount of effort and care into his models. If
it were me, I'd think twice before questioning something he did, and
I'd be darned sure I did my homework first, because it's certain he
will have. But if he says he's interested in
On 2/22/2011 8:35 AM, Gene Buckle wrote:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011, Gary Neely wrote:
Syd places an enormous amount of effort and care into his models. If
it were me, I'd think twice before questioning something he did, and
I'd be darned sure I did my homework first, because it's certain he
will
I am not a 777 pilot in real life, but I certainly agree with Jack that
the FDM seems unrealistic to the casual pilot. For instance, fire up
the 772ER and set the fuel tanks and payload weights to full capacity.
Now make sure the flaps are set to 0. Take off, bear the blaring
takeoff config
On 02/22/2011 04:09 PM, Ryan M wrote:
I am not a 777 pilot in real life, but I certainly agree with Jack that
the FDM seems unrealistic to the casual pilot.
For those interested (Curt made me look at a YASim file last week for
the first time in over a year, so my head happened to be in the
I had started this thread in hopes we would have a democracy type
decision, and vote for the aircraft we think would be a best
replacement. I rarely fly large jets, and usually fly helicopters, but
I do think that the default jumbo jet should either have a few more
restrictions so you
Hi Jack,
I think the BO-105 could be replaced with either the EC-135
or AH-1.
The state of the BO-105 cockpit is not very good at the
moment, and a
great visual model along with a good FDM is what we want.
Interesting.
You want to see another aircraft than the 777 because the fdm
This is much more helpful than just a 'its unrealistic' and leave it
at that. I,ve been testing some changes , it
does tend to lift fairly early , but I think Ive got it a little
closer now.I,ve so noticed a fuel.nas error at startup ,
so I'll tackle that one too. Thanks for the feedback guys.I'm
Another thing I've noticed when flying the 772ER long distances (KIND to
EDDF, about 10-15% fuel consumed) is that fuel consumption seems
abnormally low. I'm far from a YASim expert, but I've heard this may be
due to an overly high lift ratio in the FDM. The 777's is around 193;
perhaps this
I wasn't planning to get into an argument over the 777-200, but yes it
does have an unrealistic FDM.
See here:
http://img219.imageshack.us/img219/891/picture5mj.png
Are you telling me this is realistic too?
Check Six,
Jack
Well a picture isn't what i asked for , I asked for some facts to
back up that 'unrealistic' statement...
And Ive seen stranger things around KSFO ;)
But I'm not looking for an argument , I'm looking for some suggestions
on how to improve it
from real world airliner pilots.
Cheers
On Mon, Feb
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011, Jack Mermod wrote:
I wasn't planning to get into an argument over the 777-200, but yes it
does have an unrealistic FDM.
See here:
http://img219.imageshack.us/img219/891/picture5mj.png
Are you telling me this is realistic too?
Tex Johnson did it with a 707 that had a
Reminded me of this video ... it IS a 757 , but still the performance
is amazing ...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_vJliayH6co
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Gene Buckle ge...@deltasoft.com wrote:
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011, Jack Mermod wrote:
I wasn't planning to get into an argument over
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Jack Mermod jackmer...@gmail.com wrote:
Are you telling me this is realistic too?
No, it is notso stop flying like that... :-P
Really, what is with this recent trend of bashing quite rudely on the
777? And the usual evidence is stuff like that...flying the
On Monday 21 February 2011 17:41:10 Jack Mermod wrote:
I wasn't planning to get into an argument over the 777-200, but yes it
does have an unrealistic FDM.
See here:
http://img219.imageshack.us/img219/891/picture5mj.png
Are you telling me this is realistic too?
Check Six,
Syd places an enormous amount of effort and care into his models. If
it were me, I'd think twice before questioning something he did, and
I'd be darned sure I did my homework first, because it's certain he
will have. But if he says he's interested in suggestions for
improvements, he means it, and
21 matches
Mail list logo
