On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 15:51 -0700, Hal V. Engel wrote:
* 5: FDM models out of normal flight envelope characterisics IE.
stalls, spins and compressibility/transonic effects (if the
aircraft can reach transonic speeds).
Darn, I did go to great lengths to develop a flight
Stuart wrote
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 9:19 AM, I wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Hal V. Engel wrote:
I used it for the P-51D and found the system to be easy to use and it
took
all of perhaps 10 to 15 minutes to create ratings for the four areas
that
get scored and then create
On Thu, 26 May 2011 08:57:18 +0200, Erik wrote in message
1306393038.2534.1.camel@Raptor:
On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 15:51 -0700, Hal V. Engel wrote:
* 5: FDM models out of normal flight envelope characterisics
IE. stalls, spins and compressibility/transonic effects (if the
On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 10:52 +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Thu, 26 May 2011 08:57:18 +0200, Erik wrote in message
1306393038.2534.1.camel@Raptor:
On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 15:51 -0700, Hal V. Engel wrote:
* 5: FDM models out of normal flight envelope characterisics
IE. stalls, spins
On Thu, 26 May 2011 12:40:46 +0200, Erik wrote in message
1306406446.1743.1.camel@Raptor:
On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 10:52 +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Thu, 26 May 2011 08:57:18 +0200, Erik wrote in message
1306393038.2534.1.camel@Raptor:
On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 15:51 -0700, Hal V. Engel
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Hal V. Engel wrote:
I used it for the P-51D and found the system to be easy to use and it took
all of perhaps 10 to 15 minutes to create ratings for the four areas that
get scored and then create the entries in the *set.xml file. The system is
easy to use and
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 9:19 AM, I wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Hal V. Engel wrote:
I used it for the P-51D and found the system to be easy to use and it took
all of perhaps 10 to 15 minutes to create ratings for the four areas that
get scored and then create the entries in the
Le 25/05/2011 22:28, Stuart Buchanan a écrit :
This is done. I've gone ahead and replaced the article completely with
the rating system described in December.
Now I'm off to rate all the aircraft I maintain!
-Stuart
Hehe, nice to see that a rating system may have a chance to be established.
Hello,
Thanks for the poke. I completely forgot to write this
up.
I'll try to do this today, though it needs a proper
name.
This is done. I've gone ahead and replaced the article
completely with
the rating system described in December.
Now I'm off to rate all the aircraft I
On Wednesday, May 25, 2011 01:28:39 PM Stuart Buchanan wrote:
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 9:19 AM, I wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Hal V. Engel wrote:
I used it for the P-51D and found the system to be easy to use and it
took all of perhaps 10 to 15 minutes to create ratings for the
On Monday, May 23, 2011 04:18:46 PM Pierre Mueller wrote:
Although this should give you a list of aircraft that have been tagged as
production quality it may miss some aircraft that are actually of very
high quality and some of the listed aircraft may not be truly
production quality.
In
Although this should give you a list of aircraft that have been tagged as
production quality it may miss some aircraft that are actually of very high
quality and some of the listed aircraft may not be truly production quality.
In fact looking at the list of production aircraft from my
Le 20/05/2011 23:47, flightgear-devel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net a
écrit :
Message: 16 Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 06:15:21 -0700 (PDT) From: Gene
Buckle ge...@deltasoft.com Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel]
Flightgear-devel Digest, Vol 61, Issue 11 To: FlightGear developers
discussions
Hello,
I'm new to FlightGear but I'm using mostly OpenSource software since a whole
while.
I stumbled in here on the list when I was searching for some problems I had
with
GIT and FlightGear. Luckily I could solve it- thanks to the mails here on list
and the wiki. :-) Thanks for a simulator
On Sat, 21 May 2011 14:22:23 +0100 (BST), Pierre wrote in message
557074.13714...@web29803.mail.ird.yahoo.com:
... but I'm carefull... seems like Google Translate behind again.
..looks like you fell into that same trap yourself. ;o)
I tried MSFS, but someone told me that FlightGear is much
Hello,
...looks like you fell into that same trap yourself. ;o)
I'm not a English native speaker, but luckily I'm able to communicate without
Google translate.
But yes, I had trouble to understand what Mr. Baranger is really meaning.
I was actually refering to the sentence that he added
On Sat, 21 May 2011 17:04:33 +0100 (BST), Pierre wrote in message
379675.56250...@web29801.mail.ird.yahoo.com:
Hello,
...looks like you fell into that same trap yourself. ;o)
I'm not a English native speaker, but luckily I'm able to communicate
without Google translate.
But yes,
..there is a non-development version of FG? ;o)
Everything is here so anyone can see _how_ the
buggy ones fail, and try fix them.
I meant stable-versions.
When I use builds from the Hudson server I do get a snapshot. So things can be
broken, not run or completly buggy and not work as
On Saturday, May 21, 2011 11:11:50 AM Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Sat, 21 May 2011 17:04:33 +0100 (BST), Pierre wrote in message
379675.56250...@web29801.mail.ird.yahoo.com:
Hello,
...looks like you fell into that same trap yourself. ;o)
I'm not a English native speaker, but luckily
On Sat, 21 May 2011 14:31:17 -0700, Hal wrote in message
201105211431.19074.hven...@gmail.com:
On Saturday, May 21, 2011 11:11:50 AM Arnt Karlsen wrote:
..try fgfs --show-aircraft --min-status=production
..--min-status={alpha,beta,early-production,production}
On Saturday, May 21, 2011 04:24:38 PM Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Sat, 21 May 2011 14:31:17 -0700, Hal wrote in message
201105211431.19074.hven...@gmail.com:
On Saturday, May 21, 2011 11:11:50 AM Arnt Karlsen wrote:
..try fgfs --show-aircraft --min-status=production
21 matches
Mail list logo
