On Thu, 20 Apr 2006 00:24:03 +0200, Paul wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wednesday 19 April 2006 23:33, Dave Culp wrote:
> > I have over 14000 hrs in turbines and have only seen one overrev,
> > and that was caused by a failed fuel control.
>
> Oh ... so it's that scarce.
> In that ca
Sorry. Your message could not be delivered to:
Mike Sharkey (Mailbox or Conference is full.)
---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job e
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dave Culp schrieb:
> On Sunday 16 April 2006 03:44 pm, Paul Surgeon wrote:
>> On other thing I'd like to know is :
>> How does one over rev a turbofan engine in real life?
>> I know it's not modeled in FG yet but I'm curious as to what actually
>> happ
On Wednesday 19 April 2006 23:33, Dave Culp wrote:
> I have over 14000 hrs in turbines and have only seen one overrev, and that
> was caused by a failed fuel control.
Oh ... so it's that scarce.
In that case I won't worry about modeling it.
Thanks
Paul
--
On Sunday 16 April 2006 03:44 pm, Paul Surgeon wrote:
> On other thing I'd like to know is :
> How does one over rev a turbofan engine in real life?
> I know it's not modeled in FG yet but I'm curious as to what actually
> happens in real life to get an over speed problem.
I have over 14000 hrs in
On other thing I'd like to know is :
How does one over rev a turbofan engine in real life?
I know it's not modeled in FG yet but I'm curious as to what actually happens
in real life to get an over speed problem.
It would be nice to get that working too - I set the N1 and N2 limits in the
engine
On Saturday 15 April 2006 03:11 am, Paul Surgeon wrote:
> Yes, I suppose it's not something that can be generically modeled easily.
> Maybe it really should be modeled in nasal and left out of the engine
> modeling all together since it'll be impossible to model correctly for all
> engine types.
On Saturday 15 April 2006 03:55, Dave Culp wrote:
> > The 737-300 uses a CFM56-3 engine and the stabilized idle EGT should be
> > approximately 475 degrees Celcius although it can be as high as 650
> > degrees Celcius on a hot day in bleed configuration and if it's in a bad
> > condition.
>
> My ma
On Friday 14 April 2006 04:54 pm, Paul Surgeon wrote:
> Question 1 :
>
> Is there any way to configure the EGT for a JSBSim engine?
>
> The 737-300 uses a CFM56-3 engine and the stabilized idle EGT should be
> approximately 475 degrees Celcius although it can be as high as 650 degrees
> Ce
> Question 1 :
>
> Is there any way to configure the EGT for a JSBSim engine?
>
> The 737-300 uses a CFM56-3 engine and the stabilized idle EGT should be
> approximately 475 degrees Celcius although it can be as high as
> 650 degrees
> Celcius on a hot day in bleed configuration and if it'
10 matches
Mail list logo
