Hi,
On Nov 21, 2008, at 10:08 PM, Tim Moore wrote:
>>> From Mac OS side, there seems no problem in using headers of any
>> version of Boost as long as FlightGear works fine. I'll just grab it
>> and build FG with boost headers. No difficulties. However, if we're
>> going to use boost libraries be
"Csaba Hal??sz" wrote:
> Okay, I know I am kind of late with this, but I just found out that
> debian stable comes with 1.33.
I just tried out wether this would work with the Debian-shipped Boost
header if we simply corrupt the version number check, but apparently
Tim's rework of the OSG viewer i
Tatsuhiro Nishioka wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>From Mac OS side, there seems no problem in using headers of any
> version of Boost as long as FlightGear works fine. I'll just grab it
> and build FG with boost headers. No difficulties. However, if we're
> going to use boost libraries before the next official
Hi,
>From Mac OS side, there seems no problem in using headers of any
version of Boost as long as FlightGear works fine. I'll just grab it
and build FG with boost headers. No difficulties. However, if we're
going to use boost libraries before the next official release, I need
to make sure the bina
Sure. It is involved and complex, so I didn't want to bother people
unless they wanted the information.
First, get a compiler built via crosstool -
http://www.kegel.com/crosstool/ That allows you to low-bar the
baseline glibc and gcc (and hence libstdc++).
Then build the out-of-distro packages
Matthew Tippett wrote:
> As per other discussions, there is nothing stopping fg from creating a
> set of support libraries that exist in /opt/flightgear. This can be
> an optional 'we admit we are on the bleeding edge' support package
> that can be made broadly compatible.
>
> If people are inter
On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:47:46 -0500, Matthew wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> As per other discussions, there is nothing stopping fg from creating a
> set of support libraries that exist in /opt/flightgear. This can be
> an optional 'we admit we are on the bleeding edge' support package
>
As per other discussions, there is nothing stopping fg from creating a
set of support libraries that exist in /opt/flightgear. This can be
an optional 'we admit we are on the bleeding edge' support package
that can be made broadly compatible.
If people are interested in a recommended approach for
On vendredi 21 novembre 2008, gerard robin wrote:
> On vendredi 21 novembre 2008, Csaba Halász wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:59 PM, Tim Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > FlightGear now has a dependency on the Boost library header files. See
> > > boost.org or your favorite distribution
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 12:20 AM, Csaba Halász <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Okay, I know I am kind of late with this, but I just found out that
> debian stable comes with 1.33. Upgrading to 1.34 would mean having to
> upgrade gcc to 4.2 and libstdc++ as well.
For the record: Tim pointed out on I
On vendredi 21 novembre 2008, Csaba Halász wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:59 PM, Tim Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > FlightGear now has a dependency on the Boost library header files. See
> > boost.org or your favorite distribution. I built against version 1.34,
> > but the latest (1.37)
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:59 PM, Tim Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FlightGear now has a dependency on the Boost library header files. See
> boost.org
> or your favorite distribution. I built against version 1.34, but the latest
> (1.37) should be fine too.
Okay, I know I am kind of late wit
On jeudi 20 novembre 2008, Martin Spott wrote:
> gerard robin wrote:
> > On mercredi 19 novembre 2008, Martin Spott wrote:
> > > Tim Moore wrote:
> > > > Seriously, I imagine that people don't mind needing OSG SVN. There
> > > > isn't currently an autoconf test for the OSG version; that would
> > >
gerard robin wrote:
> On mercredi 19 novembre 2008, Martin Spott wrote:
> > Tim Moore wrote:
> > > Seriously, I imagine that people don't mind needing OSG SVN. There isn't
> > > currently an autoconf test for the OSG version; that would probably be
> > > useful.
> >
> > Indeed - and for the Boost
"Csaba Halász" wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 9:52 PM, Martin Spott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Martin Spott wrote:
> > and probably add a warning that people have to remove lines 25-27
> > in the basic 'CMakeLists.txt' of OpenSceneGraph (2.7.3) if they don't
> > use at least CMake vers
Markus Zojer wrote:
> Hmm, just built fg+sg cvs with OSG 2.7.5(svn) and display works fine
> here, but mouse clicks under sim/input/clicks would not register if too
> far away.
At my end this is FlightGear/Simgear CVS with OSG 2.7.3 developer
release (plus boost 1.34.1, for the sake of complete
Martin Spott wrote:
> also the splash screen is being scaled into the lower, left corner. The
> FPS display, properly placed in the lower right corner, looks like all
> available numbers [0-9] are being drawn onto the same position at the
> same time.
Ok, this looks much better after the recent p
Martin Spott wrote:
> Alex Romosan wrote:
>
>> Tim Moore writes:
>>
>
>
>>> FlightGear now has a dependency on the Boost library header files.
>>> See boost.org or your favorite distribution. I built against version
>>> 1.34, but the latest (1.37) should be fine too.
>>>
>
>
>>
Alex Romosan wrote:
> Tim Moore writes:
> > FlightGear now has a dependency on the Boost library header files.
> > See boost.org or your favorite distribution. I built against version
> > 1.34, but the latest (1.37) should be fine too.
> something broke with this update, the heads up display show
- "Tim Moore" a écrit :
> Curtis Olson wrote:
> > I appear to get the same compile error here with OSG v2.7.1:
> >
> > CameraGroup.cxx:126: error: 'clone' is not a member of 'osg'
> > CameraGroup.cxx:131: error: 'clone' is not a member of 'osg'
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Curt.
> The overloade
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 9:52 PM, Martin Spott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin Spott wrote:
>
> and probably add a warning that people have to remove lines 25-27
> in the basic 'CMakeLists.txt' of OpenSceneGraph (2.7.3) if they don't
> use at least CMake version 2.6.1 (as I understand from
Martin Spott wrote:
> Tim Moore wrote:
> > Seriously, I imagine that people don't mind needing OSG SVN. There isn't
> > currently an autoconf test for the OSG version; that would probably be
> > useful.
>
> Indeed - and for the Boost version as well.
and probably add a warning that peopl
On mercredi 19 novembre 2008, Martin Spott wrote:
> Tim Moore wrote:
> > Seriously, I imagine that people don't mind needing OSG SVN. There isn't
> > currently an autoconf test for the OSG version; that would probably be
> > useful.
>
> Indeed - and for the Boost version as well.
>
> Cheers,
>
Tim Moore wrote:
> Seriously, I imagine that people don't mind needing OSG SVN. There isn't
> currently an autoconf test for the OSG version; that would probably be useful.
Indeed - and for the Boost version as well.
Cheers,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective abo
On mercredi 19 novembre 2008, Tim Moore wrote:
> The overloaded osg::clone() was introduced with OSG 2.7.3. I can either
> back out my use of this, or encourage you to upgrade and take advantage of
> the particle system fixes in current OSG :)
>
> Seriously, I imagine that people don't mind needin
Curtis Olson wrote:
> I appear to get the same compile error here with OSG v2.7.1:
>
> CameraGroup.cxx:126: error: 'clone' is not a member of 'osg'
> CameraGroup.cxx:131: error: 'clone' is not a member of 'osg'
>
> Thanks,
>
> Curt.
The overloaded osg::clone() was introduced with OSG 2.7.3. I ca
I appear to get the same compile error here with OSG v2.7.1:
CameraGroup.cxx:126: error: 'clone' is not a member of 'osg'
CameraGroup.cxx:131: error: 'clone' is not a member of 'osg'
Thanks,
Curt.
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 1:31 AM, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> - "Tim Moore" a écrit
On mercredi 19 novembre 2008, Detlef Faber wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 19.11.2008, 13:40 +0100 schrieb Frederic Bouvier:
> > - "Tim Moore" a écrit :
> > > Frederic Bouvier wrote:
> > > > Hi Tim,
> > > >
> > > > - "Tim Moore" a écrit :
> > > >> No new libraries are needed at this point; we're
Am Mittwoch, den 19.11.2008, 13:40 +0100 schrieb Frederic Bouvier:
> - "Tim Moore" a écrit :
>
> > Frederic Bouvier wrote:
> > > Hi Tim,
> > >
> > > - "Tim Moore" a écrit :
> > >> No new libraries are needed at this point; we're just using Boost
> > >> header files.
> > >
> > > It looks l
On Nov 19, 2008, at 3:18 PM, Tim Moore wrote:
> Tatsuhiro Nishioka wrote:
>> Okay, I'll cvs up and try it tonight.
>> For saving time, could you tell me what libraries do I have to link?
>> I need to know that for building a universal binary of boost.
> No new libraries are needed at this point; w
- "Tim Moore" a écrit :
> Frederic Bouvier wrote:
> > Hi Tim,
> >
> > - "Tim Moore" a écrit :
> >> No new libraries are needed at this point; we're just using Boost
> >> header files.
> >
> > It looks like there is also a dependency on a newer than 2.6 version
> of OSG
> >
> > -Fred
> >
Hi Tim,
Tim Moore wrote:
> FlightGear now has a dependency on the Boost library header files. See
> boost.org
> or your favorite distribution. I built against version 1.34, but the latest
> (1.37) should be fine too.
The current stable Debian distribution ships 1.33.1, and the autoconf
check
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> - "Tim Moore" a écrit :
>> No new libraries are needed at this point; we're just using Boost
>> header files.
>
> It looks like there is also a dependency on a newer than 2.6 version of OSG
>
> -Fred
>
Not intentionally. Where's the problem?
Tim
--
Hi Tim,
- "Tim Moore" a écrit :
> No new libraries are needed at this point; we're just using Boost
> header files.
It looks like there is also a dependency on a newer than 2.6 version of OSG
-Fred
--
Frédéric Bouvier
http://my.fotolia.com/frfoto/ Photo gallery - album photo
Tatsuhiro Nishioka wrote:
> Okay, I'll cvs up and try it tonight.
> For saving time, could you tell me what libraries do I have to link?
> I need to know that for building a universal binary of boost.
No new libraries are needed at this point; we're just using Boost header files.
Tim
>
> Thanks.
Okay, I'll cvs up and try it tonight.
For saving time, could you tell me what libraries do I have to link?
I need to know that for building a universal binary of boost.
Thanks.
On Nov 19, 2008, at 7:59 AM, Tim Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FlightGear now has a dependency on the Boost libra
36 matches
Mail list logo
