Re: [Flightgear-devel] DME for pa28-161

2007-02-09 Thread Thiago Drechsel
Hi Ron. I've applied the patch you've sent and now I have the radiostack on my pannel. Strange... I have FG 0.9.10 and pa28-161 I'm using is the one that comes with the original package. Thanks for your help. Thiago Ron Jensen wrote: On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 13:32 -0200, Thiago Drechsel wrote:

Re: [Flightgear-devel] DME for pa28-161

2007-02-09 Thread Martin Spott
Hi Ron, Ron Jensen wrote: Truly bizarre, I fired up this aircraft and saw the radiostack, complete with DME and though, what is Thiago talking about, its right there... Then I looked at my CVS repository and realized my Cherokee is modified. Don't remember doing that, but then I'm old. My

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Textranslate Step and Scroll

2007-02-09 Thread Ron Jensen
On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 18:55 -0500, John Denker wrote: On 02/07/2007 02:14 PM, Andy Ross wrote: So if there's a design flaw here, it's at a higher level. Maybe what's really needed is a digit extractor animation instead. Good news: The /design/ is not as flawed as it looks. All

Re: [Flightgear-devel] C172p strange behaviour with --flight-plan

2007-02-09 Thread Roy Vegard Ovesen
On Friday 09 February 2007 02:54, Dave Perry wrote: On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 00:25 +, leee wrote: Just checked again, with current cvs osg/simgear/flightgear, and I still got the same problems. As before, re-setting the A/P via the menu seems to kick everything into life. There also

Re: [Flightgear-devel] C172p strange behaviour with --flight-plan

2007-02-09 Thread leee
On Friday 09 February 2007 01:54, Dave Perry wrote: On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 00:25 +, leee wrote: Just checked again, with current cvs osg/simgear/flightgear, and I still got the same problems. As before, re-setting the A/P via the menu seems to kick everything into life. There also

Re: [Flightgear-devel] C172p strange behaviour with --flight-plan

2007-02-09 Thread leee
On Friday 09 February 2007 17:07, Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote: On Friday 09 February 2007 02:54, Dave Perry wrote: On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 00:25 +, leee wrote: Just checked again, with current cvs osg/simgear/flightgear, and I still got the same problems. As before, re-setting the A/P via

Re: [Flightgear-devel] C172p strange behaviour with --flight-plan

2007-02-09 Thread Roy Vegard Ovesen
On Friday 09 February 2007 18:24, leee wrote: Hi Roy, I am getting this with the SU-37 and I believe the version in cvs displays the problems. This is a pretty complex A/P setup with cascading up to three levels and it also includes filters to un-tie some tied nodes so that I could use

Re: [Flightgear-devel] C172p strange behaviour with --flight-plan

2007-02-09 Thread gh.robin
On Fri 9 February 2007 18:07, Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote: On Friday 09 February 2007 02:54, Dave Perry wrote: I believe that the problem Gérard and Lee has seen is not specific to the KAP140 autopilot. apInit in kap140.nas _only_ initializes the properties that belong to the KAP140 autopilot.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] C172p strange behaviour with --flight-plan

2007-02-09 Thread leee
On Friday 09 February 2007 18:14, Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote: On Friday 09 February 2007 18:24, leee wrote: Hi Roy, I am getting this with the SU-37 and I believe the version in cvs displays the problems. This is a pretty complex A/P setup with cascading up to three levels and it also

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Textranslate Step and Scroll

2007-02-09 Thread John Denker
On 02/09/2007 11:08 AM, Ron Jensen wrote: I stripped the apply_mod() function out into its own small program for analysis. The experimental analysis confirms that the code is numerically unstable. I don't think there is any way to make it numerically stable. The instability can be swept

Re: [Flightgear-devel] C172p strange behaviour with --flight-plan

2007-02-09 Thread Roy Vegard Ovesen
On Friday 09 February 2007 19:26, gh.robin wrote: Hello Roy , Every Aircraft which basicaly use the Generic autopilot (no KAP140 or else). I tested it with a lot of the nice aircraft from Lee which do not work and among the others examples the dc3 Autopilot is right with Altitude but crazy

Re: [Flightgear-devel] C172p strange behaviour with --flight-plan

2007-02-09 Thread leee
On Friday 09 February 2007 19:04, Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote: On Friday 09 February 2007 19:26, gh.robin wrote: Hello Roy , Every Aircraft which basicaly use the Generic autopilot (no KAP140 or else). I tested it with a lot of the nice aircraft from Lee which do not work and among the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] C172p strange behaviour with --flight-plan

2007-02-09 Thread Roy Vegard Ovesen
On Friday 09 February 2007 20:22, leee wrote: It's difficult to imagine a system problem that might cause this behaviour, in view of the fact that resetting appears to fix the problem. However, I know that there are a few problems that I've seen here that no one else appears to have

Re: [Flightgear-devel] C172p strange behaviour with --flight-plan

2007-02-09 Thread leee
On Friday 09 February 2007 19:45, Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote: On Friday 09 February 2007 20:22, leee wrote: It's difficult to imagine a system problem that might cause this behaviour, in view of the fact that resetting appears to fix the problem. However, I know that there are a few problems

Re: [Flightgear-devel] C172p strange behaviour with --flight-plan

2007-02-09 Thread Maik Justus
Hi LeeE, can you start flightgear with the bo105 and dynamic-view enabled? If the view direction is ok during the first second or is it spinning around? Maybe this bug has a similar cause. Maik leee schrieb am 09.02.2007 20:22: On Friday 09 February 2007 19:04, Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote:

[Flightgear-devel] autopilot, Was: C172p strange behaviour with --flight-plan

2007-02-09 Thread Roy Vegard Ovesen
On Friday 09 February 2007 21:13, leee wrote: Just tried another quick test. Opened five property browsers - autopilot/locks, autopilot/settings, autopilot/internal, autopilot/FCS/locks autopilot/FCS/controls - all seemed ok but then I pre-set most of the nodes during aircraft

Re: [Flightgear-devel] C172p strange behaviour with --flight-plan

2007-02-09 Thread gh.robin
On Fri 9 February 2007 20:04, Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote: Could you check the property browser before and after you reload the autopilot? Look at the /autopilot/new-config dir. Are all the controllers there prior to reloading the autopilot? (In the cd3 I see two pi-simple-controllers and

Re: [Flightgear-devel] C172p strange behaviour with --flight-plan

2007-02-09 Thread gh.robin
On Fri 9 February 2007 20:22, leee wrote: It's difficult to imagine a system problem that might cause this behaviour, in view of the fact that resetting appears to fix the problem. However, I know that there are a few problems that I've seen here that no one else appears to have experienced

Re: [Flightgear-devel] C172p strange behaviour with --flight-plan

2007-02-09 Thread gh.robin
On Sat 10 February 2007 01:15, gh.robin wrote: On Fri 9 February 2007 20:22, leee wrote: It's difficult to imagine a system problem that might cause this behaviour, in view of the fact that resetting appears to fix the problem. However, I know that there are a few problems that I've seen

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Textranslate Step and Scroll

2007-02-09 Thread Ron Jensen
On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 14:00 -0500, John Denker wrote: I come to slightly different conclusions. The main point of difference is that I think it would be better to change the code to establish a reasonable default scroll value, rather than rampaging through all the existing instruments to add

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Textranslate Step and Scroll

2007-02-09 Thread John Denker
On 02/09/2007 09:34 PM, Ron Jensen wrote: [250 lines of stuff we agree about] Except in your algorithm '0' can never be used as a scroll value. Well, I fixed that just now. New version: http://www.av8n.com/fly/fgfs/animation.diff Anybody who wants to set scroll0/scroll is now free to do

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Textranslate Step and Scroll

2007-02-09 Thread Mathias Fröhlich
On Saturday 10 February 2007 05:06, John Denker wrote: On 02/09/2007 09:34 PM, Ron Jensen wrote: [250 lines of stuff we agree about] :) Me too. I am still working on the osg 2d cockpit stuff to get that fast and reliable. But we have definitely stuff in the 2d panel code that should be