On 28 Jan 2010, at 04:00, syd adams wrote:
you can also check the instrumentation/nav/nav-loc , but it seems to stay
stuck on true if you tune another frequency that's out of range or invalid...
not sure when that broke.
My fault, just checked the code and it's trivial to fix. WIl commit
On 28 Jan 2010, at 03:45, Ron Jensen wrote:
Here is a nasal function to determine if a frequency is a localizer. It
accepts a frequency in megahertz and returns 1 if the frequency is an
ILS frequency.
var isILS=func(freq) {
if(freq 108.10) return 0;
if(freq 111.95) return 0;
var
On 28 Jan 2010, at 09:18, James Turner wrote:
My fault, just checked the code and it's trivial to fix. WIl commit it ASAP.
Committed now - also made the same fix for 'has-gs' which was similarly getting
stuck on the old value when no valid station was tuned.
James
Jari Häkkinen wrote:
Atlas does not like the current apt.dat.gz because of string 'SOUTH' on
line 119725:
I've fixed hepilad name assignments for two airfields, please pull the
current file from FlightGear's CVS and check if it's now working as
expected.
Actually this bunch of airfield
On Thursday 28 Jan 2010, Curtis Olson wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Ron Jensen w...@jentronics.com
wrote:
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 09:24 +, James Turner wrote:
On 28 Jan 2010, at 03:45, Ron Jensen wrote:
Here is a nasal function to determine if a frequency is a
localizer.
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:15 AM, leee wrote:
I think that as a general rule of thumb, Nasal is suitable for
relatively low update rate aircraft specific stuff - let's say up
to 10-20 Hz, but anything that has to run at a higher rate is
better implemented in controllers filters, or coded
On 28 Jan 2010, at 16:31, Curtis Olson wrote:
It's interesting though how much nasal you can actually get away with using
without making a blip on frame rates. Nasal is *very* efficient and powerful
for being an interpreted script language.
Absolutely - and I really don't want to get into
Hi all,
if you have duplicate code across many airplanes, let's say basic
navigation or basic instruments, you may still want to write a pure
Nasal library which holds generic functionality.
Another things is byte-compilation. This is a hybrid of classic
interpreters and classic compilers. And
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Brant Gipson ioncannon21...@gmail.com wrote:
Contact the domain owner to get a subdomain like mpserver12.flightgear.org
Posting here usually qualifies as contacting the domain owner :D
By the way, I think something should be done about 02. It is way too
overused
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Roland rol...@mxchange.org wrote:
Another things is byte-compilation. This is a hybrid of classic
interpreters and classic compilers. And it is e.g. done in Java or
Python. I don't want to start a discussing here if they are good or bad
languages but they
Hi,
internal balancing would be nice. Here is an example conservation
between FGFS and FGMS:
FGFS: Connects to 01.
FGMS01: Reports back that it is full (10 pilots online, e.g.) and
includes 03 in its response. 01 knows, that 03 has 3 pilots online
FGFS: Reconnects to 03
FGMS03: Reports 3 online
Oh sorry, I wasn't aware of that. :-)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation
Stay online with enterprise data centers
From: Csaba Halász:
By the way, I think something should be done about 02. It is way too
overused and seems to have some intermittent relaying problems (even
though it is supposed to have IP filtering now). I don't know if the
problems are caused by the overload or not, though. What do you think
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Rob Shearman, Jr. rmsj...@yahoo.com wrote:
I'm not certain about either of the below two statements, so take them with
a grain of salt:
(1) 02 is filtering out North American IPs as a solution for the excessive
bandwidth issues. However, is this not also
Ron Jensen wrote:
Actually, I disagree with this statement, and it represents a
fundamental shift in attitude from the way I've seen flightgear's
development progressing over the past year or two.
Well, you're implying that the past two years progress in this area of
development is to be
Am Donnerstag, den 28.01.2010, 18:18 +0100 schrieb Roland:
[...]
And one thing more when I read the subject line which came across me:
How many airplane developer will you loose if you remove the Nasal
engine from FGFS because they can write Nasal code but not C++ code?
The instant loss may
I can't read Nasal so I can't say if the function below is correct. For
what it is worth: A frequency between 108.100 and 111.950 (including end
points) is a localizer frequency if the first decimal is an odd number.
Jari
On 2010-01-28 04.45, Ron Jensen wrote:
On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 09:06
Roland wrote:
And one thing more when I read the subject line which came across me:
How many airplane developer will you loose if you remove the Nasal
engine from FGFS because they can write Nasal code but not C++ code?
Didn't you realize that this is just one single person spreading FUD in
Why change the subject? James did not ask for deprecating Nasal, he
simply wanted to avoid multiple implementation of functionality. Less
error prone and if the available functionality does not fit ones need,
then fall back on Nasal (or C++).
Cheers,
Jari
On 2010-01-28 16.20, Ron Jensen
Nasal is like C, C++, perl, and php in many ways so if you can read any of
those, you should be pretty confident that what you think nasal is doing is
what it's actually doing. Writing nasal code from scratch is harder of
course because it requires knowledge of all the picky language syntax
I think Ron started out with this subject line. I tried to change it, but
everyone is replying to the original thread. I don't think anyone is trying
to depricate nasal. They'd have a big fight on their hands if they did try!
Curt.
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Jari Häkkinen
Martin Spott wrote:
[...] Not every Perl, Python, PHP programmer (just
to name a few popular ones) is writing everything on the basis of
nothing than the scope of the API which is implemented in the core Perl
distribution.
Oooops, Freudian slip ;-)
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user
Hi,
while searching for flightsim events I came across the Flight Simulator
Convention at
the Helicopter Museum in Weston Super Mare, North Somerset, United Kingdom.
As FlightGear is being promoted (by some) as the most realistic heli sim of the
three big
players (MSFS, X-Plane and FG) it
For me the Nasal function looks strange. I can't understand what the
addition of 0.001 to freq does? For me it seems to be a waste of
precious CPU time.
Jari
On 2010-01-28 21.39, Curtis Olson wrote:
Nasal is like C, C++, perl, and php in many ways so if you can read any
of those, you
I just saw a show on TV about the Erickson Aircrane. The flightgear
aircrane is spectacular. Maybe we could demonstrate building a 400m radio
tower out of 10m sections (virtually) with it? I saw a real aircrane in
person up close at Oshkosh last summer and was even more impressed with the
The new apt.dat.gz works for me. Thanks,
Jari
On 2010-01-28 11.17, Martin Spott wrote:
Jari Häkkinen wrote:
Atlas does not like the current apt.dat.gz because of string 'SOUTH' on
line 119725:
I've fixed hepilad name assignments for two airfields, please pull the
current file from
Csaba Halász schrieb:
By the way, I think something should be done about 02. It is way too
overused and seems to have some intermittent relaying problems (even
though it is supposed to have IP filtering now). I don't know if the
problems are caused by the overload or not, though. What do you
Hi @List
Iam a Member of the German located VA-Airrescue Squadron.
Right now we are flying with MSFS 9/10 (X) on VATSIM Virtual Airspace
Systemgrid, using
the Squeakbox and its Wrapper, the terrible FSIn PlugIn for the MSFS. VATSIM
has almost
11 Million Virtual Pilots and follows realistic
AFAIK there's a person working on that, and we can't integrate VATSIM support
on FG because of their NDA and obvious issues with the GPL. A proxy can be used
to talk between FG and a VATSIM client, but no VATSIM code should be included
with FG, only the proxy code.
That's what that guy is
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 11:13 PM, HB-GRAL flightg...@sablonier.ch wrote:
Csaba Halász schrieb:
By the way, I think something should be done about 02. It is way too
overused and seems to have some intermittent relaying problems (even
though it is supposed to have IP filtering now). I don't
Hi Vic,
Thadt sounds verry good!
Do you remember wich Guy is working on the VATSIM PlugIn and how i can find the
Docs and Specs of the VATSIM
Protocoll and where is the Projected in general located?
Greetings from Stuttgart,
Peter
- Ursprüngliche Mail
Von: Victhor Foster
Yes, but he's working on a proxy app that interfaces with a VATSIM client
called sb747.
Hi Vic,
Thadt sounds verry good!
Do you remember wich Guy is working on the VATSIM PlugIn and how i can find
the Docs and Specs of the VATSIM
Protocoll and where is the Projected in general located?
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 20:25 +, Martin Spott wrote:
Roland wrote:
And one thing more when I read the subject line which came across me:
How many airplane developer will you loose if you remove the Nasal
engine from FGFS because they can write Nasal code but not C++ code?
Didn't you
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 21:39 +0100, Jari Häkkinen wrote:
Why change the subject? James did not ask for deprecating Nasal, he
simply wanted to avoid multiple implementation of functionality. Less
error prone and if the available functionality does not fit ones need,
then fall back on Nasal
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 21:21 +0100, Jari Häkkinen wrote:
I can't read Nasal so I can't say if the function below is correct. For
what it is worth: A frequency between 108.100 and 111.950 (including end
points) is a localizer frequency if the first decimal is an odd number.
Jari
Right,
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 21:59 +0100, Jari Häkkinen wrote:
For me the Nasal function looks strange. I can't understand what the
addition of 0.001 to freq does? For me it seems to be a waste of
precious CPU time.
Jari
var bar=int((freq+0.001)*10)-int(freq)*10;
The 0.001 ensures we get the
The idea is to create a Distribution for use in schools.
FG will hopefully be used in the following lessons.
* Geography
* Geology
* Physics
* Technical Drawing
* Art
* Drama
* Cooking and food
* Maths
* woodwork
* english
To make it the DeFacto, we all need to get our act together.
Thats the
I would gladly make a contribution to FlightGear.
My small contrib would be around £10 per quarter and I would expect this
cash to go towards:
* Maintaining servers online and similar
Is that mechanism in place ?
Is FlightGear.com TradeMark in place?
Is there a way I can take FlightGear and
The MP conversation is interesting.
Why should people choose between one or another MP Server :
1. Because it is written in the doc (Wiki, ...)
2. Because they check their latency from their location (which is the best
option).
3. Because they choose it based on its location.
I don't really
Hello,
I just saw a show on TV about the Erickson
Aircrane. The flightgear aircrane is spectacular. Maybe
we could demonstrate building a 400m radio tower out of 10m
sections (virtually) with it? I saw a real aircrane in
person up close at Oshkosh last summer and was even more
impressed
Olivier JACQ wrote:
The MP conversation is interesting.
Why should people choose between one or another MP Server :
1. Because it is written in the doc (Wiki, ...)
2. Because they check their latency from their location (which is the best
option).
3. Because they choose it based on its
My birthday is may 16..
and am near Swansea
.. cunning flight plan coming...
pete
Gijs de Rooy wrote:
Hi,
while searching for flightsim events I came across the Flight
Simulator Convention at
the *Helicopter Museum in Weston Super Mare, North Somerset, United
Kingdom*.
As
* they do not maintain last position
* Cant be resized
* label over flow spacing
* no Validation on entry
* Changes are sometimes immediate, even tapping in or deleting a
figure, makes the entries applies to SIM REAL time key entry..
eg trying to change heading from 270 to 280, means
The easiest way for balancing serverload is, in my opinion, a round robin dns
entry. So users simply connect to mpserver.flightgear.org, which resolvs to
mpserver01, mpserver02 etc in round robin.
A more sophisticated solution is, that the server checks the connecting client
IP and sends back
44 matches
Mail list logo
