> The metar realwx controller checks every 60 seconds for a station
> reporting
> metar and loads that data if the station id has changed since the last
> check.
> It also rechecks the metar every 15 minutes for the unchanged station.
Okay, so every 60 seconds, the controller
* determines what th
Hello Stuart,
Have you gone any further with your AIS scripting?
I have 2 receivers, one AIS for marine and the other ADS-B for aircraft, I
am planning on driving AI aircraft and ships with both Probably need some
kind of proxy or relay server on them as well. Also there some processing
steps re
> I would have guessed that loading these images would be an infrequent
> hit making file size a relatively small factor, but if the system is
> continually swapping them out and reloading them for some reason, that
> might not be so.
*shrugs* It's reasonable to set things up in such a way that a
Chris wrote:
..
>
> In my personal opinion, knowingly allowing the use of trademarks in
> aircraft liveries without the permission of the trademark holder
> *damages* this Project's integrity. However, if the consensus of the
> core development team is that this kind of hair splitting is acc
Hi Vivian,
I'm currently short in time, but some things here are wrong.
I photograph in my free time, and I'm beeing a webmaster, so I do know a "bit"
about laws, copyrights etc. regarding photos.
I will come with the corrections up today later.
But the law in germany is not much different tha
> I'm going to set you all a simple multiple choice test - pay attention
> because I'm only going to say this once:
>
> 7. Do I have to ask permission of the motor manufacturer, the
> professional
> photographer, or you to make or to publish my work on the internet?
>
> A. No
> B. Yes
>
> 8. I g
Hi,
To make it clear again: trademarks are copyrighted mostly arround the word. At
least in USA and good old europe.
Inproper use of trademarks is not allowed. How this "inproper use" is defined
is different in many countries. USA has the "Fair Use" thing, but this isn't
accepted in other coun
I have to add something about arial photos (german law):
Aerial photos doesn't need permission to be published unless it hurts the
privatsphere of anyone.
--
Free Software Download: Index, Search & Analyze Logs and ot
2011/3/3
>
> Is there any example in Flightgear that is made with dxt textures which I
> could study and try to understand?
>
>
Brest photoscenery made with *.dds files.
And I'm personally use for few years
http://code.google.com/p/nvidia-texture-tools/
All data/Textures(.high) and my favorite
On Jan 27, 2011, at 3:21 AM, Erik Hofman wrote:
> The Bronco has been updated last week and should work properly (I tested
> it), granted .. not in fgrun.
>
> The Fokker50-Denim file seems to be outdated and superseded by the
> livery selection system. Will update that soon.
>
> Erik
>
Erik,
Jon
>
> > I'm going to set you all a simple multiple choice test - pay attention
> > because I'm only going to say this once:
> >
> > 7. Do I have to ask permission of the motor manufacturer, the
> > professional
> > photographer, or you to make or to publish my work on the internet?
> >
> > A. N
On 03.03.2011 09:47, thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi wrote:
> The total time to load a configuration is really proportional to
>
> (number of objects) x (texture size of a single object)
So maybe the textures aren't really shared. What's worse - and slightly
related: I ran a memory analysis some weeks ago,
On Mar 3, 2011, at 12:10 PM, Peter Brown wrote:
>
>
> Erik, I updated the Bronco slightly if you want to take a look.
>
>
> Changes:
> GPS works in the black pony.
> All models have canopy doors open and shut via "c".
> All models have a pitot tube instead of that knife looking segment face.
>
> I'm currently busy with other stuff. But checking on what's going wrong
> with loading/unloading clouds and MP models may be worth a closer look.
There was a fix for a MP memory leak approx. two weeks ago:
http://gitorious.org/fg/flightgear/commit/8962477cfa10850cb459d7de754c9a435cc91293
Torste
Vivian Meazza wrote:
> I'm going to set you all a simple multiple choice test - pay attention
> because I'm only going to say this once:
Viviane you are on the complete wrong track, sorry.
Taking pictures is documenting existing items while creating or redrawing
items is a creatie work replicatin
On 03.03.2011 20:51, Torsten Dreyer wrote:
>> I'm currently busy with other stuff. But checking on what's going wrong
>> with loading/unloading clouds and MP models may be worth a closer look.
> There was a fix for a MP memory leak approx. two weeks ago:
> http://gitorious.org/fg/flightgear/commit/
What are the coordinate conventions used for eye position offsets in 2.0?
standard right-hand rule or something else? Messing with the camera
offsets and not getting the results expected. OTOH, the documentation on
the subject is VERY old (circa 2002!). Is it still valid?
John
---
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Harry Campigli wrote:
> Hello Stuart,
>
> Have you gone any further with your AIS scripting?
I have. I've got a quite nice proxy and some very simple heuristics
to make the ship movements seem realistic. Unfortunately they don't
quite work with ships docking from hi
On 03/03/2011 02:16 PM, cas...@mminternet.com wrote:
> What are the coordinate conventions used for eye position offsets in 2.0?
>
> standard right-hand rule or something else? Messing with the camera
> offsets and not getting the results expected. OTOH, the documentation on
> the subject is VERY
If you're referring to coordinates in the multiscreen support, they
are OpenGL coordinates: x to the right, y up, z comes out of the
screen.
Tim
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 10:16 PM, wrote:
> What are the coordinate conventions used for eye position offsets in 2.0?
>
> standard right-hand rule or so
> If you're referring to coordinates in the multiscreen support, they
> are OpenGL coordinates: x to the right, y up, z comes out of the
> screen.
>
>
apologies to all, should have been more explicit...
referring to the view offsets of the eye position defined as the pilot's
location in the cockpi
Oliver
> Vivian Meazza wrote:
> > I'm going to set you all a simple multiple choice test - pay attention
> > because I'm only going to say this once:
>
> Viviane you are on the complete wrong track, sorry.
> Taking pictures is documenting existing items while creating or redrawing
> items is a
On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 09:43 +, Vivian Meazza wrote:
> I'm going to set you all a simple multiple choice test - pay attention
> because I'm only going to say this once:
Okay, now it's my turn. Please answer the following:
1. Is there a difference between a trademark and a copyright?
A. Yes
On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 13:51 -0500, Peter Brown wrote:
> http://www.mediafire.com/file/zo967hk164bjkzq/OV10%2020110303.zip
The files are set to private so I'm unable to retrieve them.
Erik
--
What You Don't Know About Da
24 matches
Mail list logo