Martin Spott wrote:
> Greg Hawkes wrote:
>
>> One solution to this problem is to create a shared database of every
>> (well, every /regularly scheduled/) flight everywhere in the world. This
>> idea is similar to FlightGear's world scenery database. That project
>> claims to aim for world domin
Greg Hawkes wrote:
> One solution to this problem is to create a shared database of every
> (well, every /regularly scheduled/) flight everywhere in the world. This
> idea is similar to FlightGear's world scenery database. That project
> claims to aim for world domination, so why not have the s
On Sunday 27 July 2008 21:24, James Turner wrote:
>
> Incidentally, a minor rant - even in the past week, I've seen the 'XXX
> is being worked on, person YYY has lots of changes which they haven't
> committed for arbitrary (justifiable) reason ZZZ'. I'd like to get
> involved in hacking on some ac
(here's a can of worms, please forgive any erroneous assumptions I'm
making)
As someone new coming to FG, it's pretty tricky to get a handle on
what's going on, what's being worked on, what needs fixed and so on.
Of course this is an issue for all software projects, and there's
different s
Durk Talsma wrote:
So what is traffic manager II? Well the main difference is that it will become
a lot easier for users to develop their own traffic. Instead of going through
a complicated procedure of compiling a sequence of flights into an xml file,
the new version just requires a plain text
On 28 Jul 2008, at 02:39, Tim Moore wrote:
> I'm not sure what's going on in your example, as foo needs to be
> defined
> somewhere in order for wibble to inherit from it. Otherwise there's
> serious bug
> there.
>> If we're requiring a never MSVC than that, I believe we're fine. And
>> perha
6 matches
Mail list logo
