Interesting post by John Denker...
While I have no real comment about the Airbus issue (other than to say
that is was a great job of piloting a stricken aircraft), I can comment
on the status of a project to get Flight Gear FAA-certified.
As several of you may know, four of us are working on a pr
Hi Tim,
On Sunday 11 January 2009 21:07:25 Tim Moore wrote:
>
> I propose that the 1.9.1 release be made from these "maint" branches. This
> would let progress continue in CVS while hopefully achieving some stability
> in a maintenance release. If current committers would like write access to
> th
On 01/17/2009 10:11 PM, Alex Perry wrote:
> Procedural trainers are useful and the FAA has a minimum specification
> (PCATD) which determines how much fidelity is needed to ensure a net
> positive training value for the student. FlightGear does not
> currently meet that standard.
Agreed. But is
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 7:54 PM, John Denker wrote:
> On 01/17/2009 05:47 PM, Curtis Olson wrote:
>> You are expecting a complete cockpit enclosure, instruments, radio hardware,
>> instructor station software, plush seat, and FAA certification for free?
>> The FAA doesn't certify a software applic
On 01/17/2009 05:47 PM, Curtis Olson wrote:
> You are expecting a complete cockpit enclosure, instruments, radio hardware,
> instructor station software, plush seat, and FAA certification for free?
> The FAA doesn't certify a software application (well unless you are looking
> at a PCATD and even
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 1:16 AM, Martin Spott wrote:
> "Csaba Hal??sz" wrote:
>
>> I have never been near a solaris machine, but sure, post errors and we'll
>> see :)
>
> Thanks for your offer, no obligation implicated ;-)
>
> I put the output of 'make -k' here:
>
> http://foxtrot.mgras.net/sta
Curtis Olson wrote:
>On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 6:30 PM, John Denker wrote:
>
>
>
>>On 01/17/2009 05:16 PM, Curtis Olson wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>http://www.atcflightsim.com/index.html
>>>
>>>
>>If I may be permitted to answer in kind:
>>
>>http://www.atcflightsim.com/pricing.html
>>
>>
>
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 7:00 PM, John Wojnaroski wrote:
> Or for that matter
>
> http://www.lfstech.com/index.html
Good point. :-)
Curt.
--
Curtis Olson: http://baron.flightgear.org/~curt/
--
This SF.net email is spons
Curtis Olson wrote:
>On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 6:00 PM, syd adams wrote:
>
>
>
>>So, how about it? Who is serious about going down that
>>road?
>>I am , for one, which is why I dont get the apperent need to impress the
>>general user community... I didn't think we were creating a game here...
>>
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 6:30 PM, John Denker wrote:
> On 01/17/2009 05:16 PM, Curtis Olson wrote:
>
> > http://www.atcflightsim.com/index.html
>
> If I may be permitted to answer in kind:
>
> http://www.atcflightsim.com/pricing.html
You are expecting a complete cockpit enclosure, instruments, r
On 01/17/2009 05:16 PM, Curtis Olson wrote:
> http://www.atcflightsim.com/index.html
If I may be permitted to answer in kind:
http://www.atcflightsim.com/pricing.html
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Co
"syd adams" wrote:
> Input is always appreciated , with facts and docs to back it up , but not
> the "its wrong because I say so" kind of help ...
Well put !
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
"Csaba Hal??sz" wrote:
> I have never been near a solaris machine, but sure, post errors and we'll see
> :)
Thanks for your offer, no obligation implicated ;-)
I put the output of 'make -k' here:
http://foxtrot.mgras.net/static/SimGear_SunStudio11.log.bz2
Apparently most of the error messa
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 6:00 PM, syd adams wrote:
> So, how about it? Who is serious about going down that
> road?
> I am , for one, which is why I dont get the apperent need to impress the
> general user community... I didn't think we were creating a game here...
> I'm currently more interested
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Jon S. Berndt wrote:
> Many of you recall the hijacked airliner than ran out of fuel ten or
> fifteen years ago. The resulting ditching didn't turn out so well, with most
> people drowning. That was on the ocean near the shore. In the recent case,
> it appears that
So, how about it? Who is serious about going down that
road?
I am , for one, which is why I dont get the apperent need to impress the
general user community... I didn't think we were creating a game here...
I'm currently more interested in getting the glass cockpits to behave
realistically , but s
> Hi Folks --
>
> I suppose you've heard about the Airbus A320 that ditched
> in the Hudson river, in the shadow of downtown Manhattan, on
> Thursday. As crashes go, it must be considered a success,
> since there were no fatalities and almost no serious
> injuries.
>
> Around here it has receive
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 8:54 PM, Martin Spott wrote:
> "Vikas N Kumar" wrote:
>
>> Below is the patch to allow Sun Studio 11 compilers to compile SimGear
>> on Solaris 10 for SPARC cleanly.
>
> Would anyone be (seriously!) willing to deal with Solaris/SunStudio
> portability issues which I'm unabl
Hi Folks --
I suppose you've heard about the Airbus A320 that ditched
in the Hudson river, in the shadow of downtown Manhattan, on
Thursday. As crashes go, it must be considered a success,
since there were no fatalities and almost no serious
injuries.
Around here it has received around-the-clo
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 9:08 PM, Martin Spott wrote:
> nevertheless I'm surprised to see a missing XML config file
> segfaulting the entire simulation (current CVS, Linux AMD64).
I am not :)
--
Csaba/Jester
Index: src/FDM/JSBSim/models/FGFCS.cpp
=
While you're talking about the C310: When I'm trying to load the
"c310dpm-3d", I'm getting the following error:
Could not open file: [...]/data/Aircraft/c310/c310ap.xml
Segmentation fault
This is easy to cure by commenting the AP-related lines in 'c310.xml'
(done), nevertheless I'm surprised to
Csaba/Jester:
Oh, Yes, I didn't fetch newest SimGear sources!
Thanks for your help!
在2009-01-17，"Csaba Halász" 写道：
>On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 2:39 PM, 黄志勇 wrote:
>> I fetch the newest source code from FlightGear cvs repository.
>> But I compile failed. Error messages like these:
>>
>> 2>e:\flig
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Durk Talsma wrote:
>
> One thing to consider is that with OSG, we can consider merging "real"
> aircraft, and their AI counterparts back into a single aircraft (IIRC, LOD
> management is much better in OSG than it was in PLIB).
I am all for that. It would be a fir
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 11:18 PM, Csaba Halász wrote:
> More valgrind fixes. Includes the previous one.
Fred, thanks for the commit.
Unfortunately I forgot about the boost pumps, so here is a follow-up.
--
Csaba/Jester
Index: src/Aircraft/controls.cxx
===
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 2:39 PM, 黄志勇 wrote:
> I fetch the newest source code from FlightGear cvs repository.
> But I compile failed. Error messages like these:
>
> 2>e:\flight gear cvs\source\src\traffic\schedule.cxx(582) : error C2039:
> 'distanceNm' : is not a member of 'SGGeoc'
>
> What's wrong
I fetch the newest source code from FlightGear cvs repository.
But I compile failed. Error messages like these:
2>e:\flight gear cvs\source\src\traffic\schedule.cxx(582) : error C2039:
'distanceNm' : is not a member of 'SGGeoc'
2>e:\flight gear cvs\simgear\simgear\math\sggeoc.hxx(26) :
On Thursday 15 January 2009 18:18:05 Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * Stuart Buchanan -- Thursday 15 January 2009:
> [+26 liveries]
>
> > My view is that they should be kept with the aircraft.
>
> Of course, liveries should generally be kept with the aircraft.
> But how many? Do 50 liveries for an aircraf
27 matches
Mail list logo
