On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 04:24:42 +0100, Arnt wrote in message
<20090320042442.01b2d...@a45.fmb.no>:
> ..now trying a ./maketg DOUPD ADDDEBUG NOPAUSE run to see
> if I get the same SG .configure failure as with ./makefg.
a...@a45:/opt/bygg/tg $ ll /opt/bygg/tg/tmp/templog7.txt
&&md5sum /opt/bygg/tg
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 21:34:00 +0100, Arnt wrote in message
<20090319213400.659ce...@a45.fmb.no>:
> On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:36:46 +0100, Geoff wrote in message
> <1237480606.6461.3.ca...@dell02>:
> ..I'll try, this time too, I'm afraid I must file a motion
> to file an overlength reply. ;o)
..no
On 03/19/2009 04:43 PM, Lauri Peltonen wrote:
> First of all I'd like to say hi to all as this is my first message to
> this list! Hi :)
Hi. I hope your contributions meet a better fate than mine have.
> Then, when messing around with fg, I noticed that the current atmosphere
> model is somewh
Hi!
First of all I'd like to say hi to all as this is my first message to
this list! Hi :)
Then, when messing around with fg, I noticed that the current atmosphere
model is somewhat correct only on troposphere (around 12km or so), and I
think some aircrafts we have can go higher than that.
So I
On jeudi 19 mars 2009, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * gerard robin -- Thursday 19 March 2009:
> > Then, do you mean that the old "Radar Fashion" will be removed,
> > what a pity.
>
> I haven't planned that (yet). But in the long run it should get
> removed. This was an early mechanism to get the brand-n
* gerard robin -- Thursday 19 March 2009:
> Then, do you mean that the old "Radar Fashion" will be removed,
> what a pity.
I haven't planned that (yet). But in the long run it should get
removed. This was an early mechanism to get the brand-new AI
models on the screen (for the T38?), and that was
On jeudi 19 mars 2009, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * gerard robin -- Thursday 19 March 2009:
> > With the usual AI tankers we have a lot of data regarding the Radar
> > x-shift y-shift in-range , rotation, v-offset, .. and so on
> >
> > That tanker feature don't gives such information , it i
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:36:46 +0100, Geoff wrote in message
<1237480606.6461.3.ca...@dell02>:
> Hi Arnt,
>
> Please reduce the unnecessary 'size' of your emails. Sometimes
> it takes many clicks to get to anything you MAY have added.
>
> Instead of adding _ALL_ that has been said, pick out a li
* gerard robin -- Thursday 19 March 2009:
> With the usual AI tankers we have a lot of data regarding the Radar
> x-shift y-shift in-range , rotation, v-offset, .. and so on
>
> That tanker feature don't gives such information , it is missing ,
> is it any valuable reason ?
That's not
On lundi 16 mars 2009, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> While we are at it, here some comments on tanker.nas:
>
> There's a menu entry AI/MP->Tanker, which opens a small dialog where
> you can request a tanker. It'll contact you and tell you something
> like this:
>
> "MOBIL3 at 15000, heading 130 with 25
Hi Arnt,
Please reduce the unnecessary 'size' of your emails. Sometimes
it takes many clicks to get to anything you MAY have added.
Instead of adding _ALL_ that has been said, pick out a little
of the relevant context, if needed, like I do... ;=))
> > IT WILL NOT 'SEE' PLIB UNLESS Y
On jeudi 19 mars 2009, gerard robin wrote:
> On jeudi 19 mars 2009, gerard robin wrote:
> > On jeudi 19 mars 2009, Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Given this thread.
> > > I have checked in the change to simgear.
> > > I have also updated the default c172 and selectively those submode
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 06:28:26 -0700 (PDT), Gene wrote in message
:
> On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Tim Moore wrote:
>
> >
> > You don't have to provide sources with the binaries to comply with
> > the GPL, you just have to make them available if the a recipient of
> > the binary asks for them. In this cas
* Frederic Bouvier -- Thursday 19 March 2009:
> Support old compilers
- if(argc < 2 or argc > 3)
+ if(argc < 2 || argc > 3)
Argh ... sorry! That's a contamination from Nasal. I don't get why
g++ doesn't turn this nonsense off by default. Won't happen again.
m.
--
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Tim Moore wrote:
>
> You don't have to provide sources with the binaries to comply with the GPL,
> you just have to make them available if the a recipient of the binary asks
> for them. In this case company "A" better have a plan in place for when an
> eventual paying customer
Hello,
what does that mean in future for me as 3d-modeller?
What I have to change when using Blender?
Rgards
HHS
Hi,
Given this thread.
I have checked in the change to simgear.
I have also updated the default c172 and selectively those submodels that I
thought need some update.
And I have updat
On jeudi 19 mars 2009, gerard robin wrote:
> On jeudi 19 mars 2009, Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Given this thread.
> > I have checked in the change to simgear.
> > I have also updated the default c172 and selectively those submodels that
> > I thought need some update.
> > And I have up
On jeudi 19 mars 2009, Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Given this thread.
> I have checked in the change to simgear.
> I have also updated the default c172 and selectively those submodels that I
> thought need some update.
> And I have updated all the ac models in the AI and the Models subdirecto
I just checked in the new code and new documentation README.digitalfilter in
both, the data and the source tree.
The code should be fully compatible to existing autopilot configurations but
adds some new options:
- supports tags
- a missing element now means enabled for every filter
- Almost a
Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
> Erik,
>
> On Thursday 19 March 2009 09:08:29 Erik Hofman wrote:
>> To be honnest I don't like this action. I've always made sure all color
>> settings were right in the modeller and did'nt adjust them to look nice
>> in FlightGear in any way. Same goes for the F-16, T-37,
Erik,
On Thursday 19 March 2009 09:08:29 Erik Hofman wrote:
> To be honnest I don't like this action. I've always made sure all color
> settings were right in the modeller and did'nt adjust them to look nice
> in FlightGear in any way. Same goes for the F-16, T-37, T-38, Fokker
> 100, Fokker 70 a
Hi,
Given this thread.
I have checked in the change to simgear.
I have also updated the default c172 and selectively those submodels that I
thought need some update.
And I have updated all the ac models in the AI and the Models subdirectory.
For the specific aircraft models, I do not want to ju
Mathias Froehlich wrote:
> Update of /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/AI/Aircraft/Fokker-50/Models
> In directory baron.flightgear.org:/tmp/cvs-serv2499/Aircraft/Fokker-50/Models
>
> Modified Files:
> fokker50.ac
> Log Message:
> Set the ambient color equal to the rgb color.
> This is what cur
Hi Tim,
On Tuesday 17 March 2009 19:58:02 Tim Moore wrote:
> That needs to be handled in the shader program. The OpenGL fog parameters
> are available as uniforms in shaders.
Sure, but you need to rewrite that in every shader?
Sure, that is the was OpenGL/OpenSceneGraph does this.
> > How does t
24 matches
Mail list logo
