Re: [Flightgear-devel] A-10 3D cockpit progress

2006-02-27 Thread Martin Spott
"dene maxwell" wrote: > I regret any offence I may have caused you. Given that this not the first > time I have caused you personal offence. After careful consideration I feel > it is prudent that I hang up the keyboard on the developer lists, at least > until such time as I can afford hardware

Re: [Flightgear-devel] A-10 3D cockpit progress

2006-02-26 Thread dene maxwell
to provide valid comments in the context of new developments. Regards Dene From: Martin Spott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] A-10 3D cockpit progress Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006

Re: [Flightgear-devel] A-10 3D cockpit progress

2006-02-26 Thread dene maxwell
-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] A-10 3D cockpit progress Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 13:09:47 +0100 Lee Elliott a écrit : > On Saturday 25 February 2006 17:56, alexis bory wrote: >> I'll do that ASAP, maybe sunday n

Re: [Flightgear-devel] A-10 3D cockpit progress

2006-02-26 Thread Ampere K. Hardraade
On Sunday 26 February 2006 06:13, dene maxwell wrote: > Hi Chris, > I don't disagree with anything you're saying. I don't (and never have) run > 3-d cockpits, I believe my hardware setup is too primative to support them. > This is not the fault of FG, it is a probelm I am saving up to remedy. You >

RE: [Flightgear-devel] A-10 3D cockpit progress

2006-02-26 Thread Jon S. Berndt
Erik wrote: > FlightGear should always display messages when it is labeled "alert". > Maybe there is a log-level mismatch between FlightGear and JSBSim? Here's the controlling code in JSBSim.cxx: switch (logbuf::get_log_priority()) { case SG_BULK: FGJSBBase::debug_lvl

Re: [Flightgear-devel] A-10 3D cockpit progress

2006-02-26 Thread Erik Hofman
Jon S. Berndt wrote: Anyhow, I'll keep this in mind and maybe I can add some of these suggestions. But, I have noticed that sometimes when error messages are sent to the console, the user doesn't look for those, anyhow. SimGear also hides the messages that JSBSim normally puts out to prevent the

RE: [Flightgear-devel] A-10 3D cockpit progress

2006-02-26 Thread Jon S. Berndt
Chris wrote: > To what little I understand, I agree completely that changes were > good. But from the FlightGear perspective, one could have imagined > different ways of dealing with old-style config files. For example, one > could have imagined a parser which detected the config file style, and

Re: [Flightgear-devel] A-10 3D cockpit progress

2006-02-26 Thread Chris Metzler
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 08:10:36 -0600 Jon S. Berndt wrote: > Chris Metzler wrote: >>> >>> Sorry, I'm feeling really slow (probably because it's late where I >>> am, > and >>> I should go to sleep). There was a change in JSBSim configuration >>> file format in going to JSBSim 2.0; that has caused a lo

Re: [Flightgear-devel] A-10 3D cockpit progress

2006-02-26 Thread Stefan Seifert
dene maxwell wrote: If I chose to stay with the old version front end then I could still expect the functionality I had enjoyed to still be available. This is not the case with 098a MP. 098a MP no longer exists and having supported a household upgrade to cable 'net on the basis of being able t

RE: [Flightgear-devel] A-10 3D cockpit progress

2006-02-26 Thread Jon S. Berndt
Chris Metzler wrote: > >Sorry, I'm feeling really slow (probably because it's late where I am, and > >I should go to sleep). There was a change in JSBSim configuration file > >format in going to JSBSim 2.0; that has caused a lot of aircraft that > >haven't yet been updated to not run under FG 0.9

Re: [Flightgear-devel] A-10 3D cockpit progress

2006-02-26 Thread Lee Elliott
On Sunday 26 February 2006 12:09, alexis bory wrote: > Lee Elliott a écrit : > > On Saturday 25 February 2006 17:56, alexis bory wrote: > >> I'll do that ASAP, maybe sunday night or monday. > > > > I can't see any need for a separate folder - add your stuff > > to the A-10, your name and comments t

Re: [Flightgear-devel] A-10 3D cockpit progress

2006-02-26 Thread alexis bory
Lee Elliott a écrit : > On Saturday 25 February 2006 17:56, alexis bory wrote: >> I'll do that ASAP, maybe sunday night or monday. > I can't see any need for a separate folder - add your stuff to the > A-10, your name and comments to the existing files, especially the > tag in the A-10-set.xml

Re: [Flightgear-devel] A-10 3D cockpit progress

2006-02-26 Thread Martin Spott
"dene maxwell" wrote: > I would hate to see a aircraft that works under 098a and perhaps earlier > that is enjoyed by many users "overwritten" and possibliy become > unavailable. Nobody holds you back from keeping a copy of the old aircraft implementation, you just don't get all the new featuer

Re: [Flightgear-devel] A-10 3D cockpit progress

2006-02-26 Thread Martin Spott
"dene maxwell" wrote: >>From: Lee Elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>A separate A-10-3Dcockpit would make the existing A-10 redundant >>- who would want to fly it without your cockpit? :) > > Maybe those langishing on 098a? From what I've seen of Alexis cockpit, I > would love to fly it with his co

Re: [Flightgear-devel] A-10 3D cockpit progress

2006-02-26 Thread dene maxwell
Hi Chris, I don't disagree with anything you're saying. I don't (and never have) run 3-d cockpits, I believe my hardware setup is too primative to support them. This is not the fault of FG, it is a probelm I am saving up to remedy. You are right; "I can't run 3-d cockpits." I run 098a binary

Re: [Flightgear-devel] A-10 3D cockpit progress

2006-02-26 Thread Chris Metzler
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 18:47:26 +1300 dene maxwell wrote: > > Hi Chris, > > agreed, 3-D is not a 099 peculiarity... but I can't run 3-D cockpits > under my implementation of 098a, I've put this down to hardware > restrictions and it hasn't been important as there are plenty of > options in the way

Re: [Flightgear-devel] A-10 3D cockpit progress

2006-02-25 Thread dene maxwell
Hi Chris, agreed, 3-D is not a 099 peculiarity... but I can't run 3-D cockpits under my implementation of 098a, I've put this down to hardware restrictions and it hasn't been important as there are plenty of options in the way of equally enjoyable aircraft. Some of the new aircraft are designe

Re: [Flightgear-devel] A-10 3D cockpit progress

2006-02-25 Thread Ampere K. Hardraade
On Saturday 25 February 2006 19:25, Lee Elliott wrote: > I can't see any need for a separate folder - add your stuff to > the A-10, your name and comments to the existing files, > especially the tag in the A-10-set.xml file and send it > to one of the cvs maintainers. > > A separate A-10-3Dcockpit

Re: [Flightgear-devel] A-10 3D cockpit progress

2006-02-25 Thread Chris Metzler
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 17:16:51 +1300 dene maxwell wrote: >>From: Lee Elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> I can't see any need for a separate folder - add your stuff to >> the A-10, your name and comments to the existing files, >> especially the tag in the A-10-set.xml file and send it >> to one of the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] A-10 3D cockpit progress

2006-02-25 Thread dene maxwell
Hi Lee, From: Lee Elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Saturday 25 February 2006 17:56, alexis bory wrote: > Lee Elliott a écrit : > > On Friday 24 February 2006 21:11, alexis bory wrote: > >> 10 more days and I will put a .tgz too :) > > > > How are those folk who like flying the A-10 getting on wit

Re: [Flightgear-devel] A-10 3D cockpit progress

2006-02-25 Thread Martin Spott
alexis bory wrote: > I'd like to upload some thing clean ( shall I upload to > ftp://ftp.ihg.uni-duisburg.de/FlightGear/incoming/ ? ) Sorry, no, this upload directory is for scenery models only as I don't write to the CVS tree (except from changes to The Manual), Martin. -- Unix _IS_ user frie

Re: [Flightgear-devel] A-10 3D cockpit progress

2006-02-25 Thread Lee Elliott
On Saturday 25 February 2006 17:56, alexis bory wrote: > Lee Elliott a écrit : > > On Friday 24 February 2006 21:11, alexis bory wrote: > >> 10 more days and I will put a .tgz too :) > > > > How are those folk who like flying the A-10 getting on with > > the current version in cvs? > > OK, Martin s

Re: [Flightgear-devel] A-10 3D cockpit progress

2006-02-25 Thread alexis bory
Lee Elliott a écrit : > On Friday 24 February 2006 21:11, alexis bory wrote: >> 10 more days and I will put a .tgz too :) > How are those folk who like flying the A-10 getting on with the > current version in cvs? OK, Martin said quite the same thing :) I'm currently figuring out the best way

Re: [Flightgear-devel] A-10 3D cockpit progress

2006-02-25 Thread Lee Elliott
On Friday 24 February 2006 21:11, alexis bory wrote: > Hi, > > A-10 cockpit is on his way. I will put screenshots on my site > from time to time. > > http://croo.murgl.org/fgfs/A-10/index.html > > Images are hudge but not so heavy. > > 10 more days and I will put a .tgz too :) > > > Next steps

Re: [Flightgear-devel] A-10 3D cockpit progress

2006-02-24 Thread Martin Spott
alexis bory wrote: > 10 more days and I will put a .tgz too :) I'dd suggest you to already submit those parts that you consider to be in a useful state - even if the whole cockpit is still not complete, Martin. -- Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are ! --

[Flightgear-devel] A-10 3D cockpit progress

2006-02-24 Thread alexis bory
Hi, A-10 cockpit is on his way. I will put screenshots on my site from time to time. http://croo.murgl.org/fgfs/A-10/index.html Images are hudge but not so heavy. 10 more days and I will put a .tgz too :) Next steps are: - HSI. - WP indicator in the AI. - altitude low warning light - nos