On Thu, 26 May 2011 12:40:46 +0200, Erik wrote in message
<1306406446.1743.1.camel@Raptor>:
> On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 10:52 +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 May 2011 08:57:18 +0200, Erik wrote in message
> > <1306393038.2534.1.camel@Raptor>:
> >
> > > On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 15:51 -0700, H
On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 10:52 +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> On Thu, 26 May 2011 08:57:18 +0200, Erik wrote in message
> <1306393038.2534.1.camel@Raptor>:
>
> > On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 15:51 -0700, Hal V. Engel wrote:
> > > * 5: FDM models out of normal flight envelope characterisics
> > > IE. st
On Wed, 25 May 2011 23:43:29 +0100 (BST), Heiko wrote in message
<182701.35568...@web29503.mail.ird.yahoo.com>:
> Hello,
>
>
> > > Thanks for the poke. I completely forgot to write this
> > up.
> > >
> > > I'll try to do this today, though it needs a proper
> > name.
>
> > This is done. I've g
On Thu, 26 May 2011 08:57:18 +0200, Erik wrote in message
<1306393038.2534.1.camel@Raptor>:
> On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 15:51 -0700, Hal V. Engel wrote:
> > * 5: FDM models out of normal flight envelope characterisics
> > IE. stalls, spins and compressibility/transonic effects (if the
> >
Stuart wrote
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 9:19 AM, I wrote:
> > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Hal V. Engel wrote:
> >> I used it for the P-51D and found the system to be easy to use and it
> took
> >> all of perhaps 10 to 15 minutes to create ratings for the four areas
> that
> >> get scored an
On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 15:51 -0700, Hal V. Engel wrote:
> * 5: FDM models out of normal flight envelope characterisics IE.
> stalls, spins and compressibility/transonic effects (if the
> aircraft can reach transonic speeds).
Darn, I did go to great lengths to develop a flight
On Wednesday, May 25, 2011 01:28:39 PM Stuart Buchanan wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 9:19 AM, I wrote:
> > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Hal V. Engel wrote:
> >> I used it for the P-51D and found the system to be easy to use and it
> >> took all of perhaps 10 to 15 minutes to create ratings f
Hello,
> > Thanks for the poke. I completely forgot to write this
> up.
> >
> > I'll try to do this today, though it needs a proper
> name.
> This is done. I've gone ahead and replaced the article
> completely with
> the rating system described in December.
> Now I'm off to rate all the aircraf
Le 25/05/2011 22:28, Stuart Buchanan a écrit :
> This is done. I've gone ahead and replaced the article completely with
> the rating system described in December.
>
> Now I'm off to rate all the aircraft I maintain!
>
> -Stuart
Hehe, nice to see that a rating system may have a chance to be establis
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 9:19 AM, I wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Hal V. Engel wrote:
>> I used it for the P-51D and found the system to be easy to use and it took
>> all of perhaps 10 to 15 minutes to create ratings for the four areas that
>> get scored and then create the entries in th
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Hal V. Engel wrote:
> I used it for the P-51D and found the system to be easy to use and it took
> all of perhaps 10 to 15 minutes to create ratings for the four areas that
> get scored and then create the entries in the *set.xml file. The system is
> easy to use an
On Monday, May 23, 2011 04:18:46 PM Pierre Mueller wrote:
> >Although this should give you a list of aircraft that have been tagged as
> >production quality it may miss some aircraft that are actually of very
> >high quality and some of the listed aircraft may not be truly
> >"production" quality.
>Although this should give you a list of aircraft that have been tagged as
>production quality it may miss some aircraft that are actually of very high
>quality and some of the listed aircraft may not be truly "production" quality.
>In fact looking at the list of "production" aircraft from m
On Saturday, May 21, 2011 04:24:38 PM Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> On Sat, 21 May 2011 14:31:17 -0700, Hal wrote in message
>
> <201105211431.19074.hven...@gmail.com>:
> > On Saturday, May 21, 2011 11:11:50 AM Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > > ..try "fgfs --show-aircraft --min-status=production "
> > >
> > >
>
On Sat, 21 May 2011 14:31:17 -0700, Hal wrote in message
<201105211431.19074.hven...@gmail.com>:
> On Saturday, May 21, 2011 11:11:50 AM Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > ..try "fgfs --show-aircraft --min-status=production "
> >
> >
> > .."--min-status={alpha,beta,early-production,production}"
> >
On Saturday, May 21, 2011 11:11:50 AM Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> On Sat, 21 May 2011 17:04:33 +0100 (BST), Pierre wrote in message
>
> <379675.56250...@web29801.mail.ird.yahoo.com>:
> > Hello,
> >
> > > ...looks like you fell into that same trap yourself. ;o)
> >
> > I'm not a English native speaker,
> ..there is a non-development version of FG? ;o)
> Everything is here so anyone can see _how_ the
> buggy ones fail, and try fix them.
I meant stable-versions.
When I use builds from the Hudson server I do get a snapshot. So things can be
broken, not run or completly buggy and not work as e
On Sat, 21 May 2011 17:04:33 +0100 (BST), Pierre wrote in message
<379675.56250...@web29801.mail.ird.yahoo.com>:
>
> Hello,
>
> > ...looks like you fell into that same trap yourself. ;o)
>
>
> I'm not a English native speaker, but luckily I'm able to communicate
> without Google translate.
>
Hello,
> ...looks like you fell into that same trap yourself. ;o)
I'm not a English native speaker, but luckily I'm able to communicate without
Google translate.
But yes, I had trouble to understand what Mr. Baranger is really meaning.
I was actually refering to the sentence that he added
On Sat, 21 May 2011 14:22:23 +0100 (BST), Pierre wrote in message
<557074.13714...@web29803.mail.ird.yahoo.com>:
> <...> but I'm carefull... seems like Google Translate behind again.
..looks like you fell into that same trap yourself. ;o)
> I tried MSFS, but someone told me that FlightGear is m
Hello,
I'm new to FlightGear but I'm using mostly OpenSource software since a whole
while.
I stumbled in here on the list when I was searching for some problems I had
with
GIT and FlightGear. Luckily I could solve it- thanks to the mails here on list
and the wiki. :-) Thanks for a simulator
Le 20/05/2011 23:47, flightgear-devel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net a
écrit :
Message: 16 Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 06:15:21 -0700 (PDT) From: Gene
Buckle Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel]
Flightgear-devel Digest, Vol 61, Issue 11 To: FlightGear developers
discussions Message-ID:
Content-Type:
TEXT/
22 matches
Mail list logo
