On Thursday 06 April 2006 15:07, Vivian Meazza wrote:
> I think that this provides a sensible migration route to OSG, if that is
> the way we are going, otherwise it seems a good proposal in its own right.
> Apart
True,
I have most of that parts of ssg that are required by flightgear simgear
reimp
"Curtis L. Olson" wrote:
> Huh!?! I've been building with plib-v1.8.4 happily without any
> problems. Officially we depend on v1.8.4. If there's something in
> plib-cvs that we could benefit from, then we should encourage those guys
> to do another release.
Several patches and improvements
AJ MacLeod
> On Thursday 06 April 2006 10:21, Martin Spott wrote:
> > this is now going to be the third release in a row that relies on PLIB
> > CVS, I find this is a bit unsatisfactory.
> I've been building CVS with plib-1.8.4 (the last release) for ages with no
> particular problems, so I'm not
Martin Spott wrote:
this is now going to be the third release in a row that relies on PLIB
CVS, I find this is a bit unsatisfactory. On the other side people are
waiting endlessly to get patches incorporated into PLIB.
I herewith propose to put a copy of PLIB into the SimGear tree after
the rel
On Thursday 06 April 2006 10:21, Martin Spott wrote:
> this is now going to be the third release in a row that relies on PLIB
> CVS, I find this is a bit unsatisfactory.
I've been building CVS with plib-1.8.4 (the last release) for ages with no
particular problems, so I'm not sure it's true to say
On Thu, 6 Apr 2006 09:21:33 + (UTC)
Martin Spott wrote:
>
> Hello,
> this is now going to be the third release in a row that relies on PLIB
> CVS, I find this is a bit unsatisfactory. On the other side people are
> waiting endlessly to get patches incorporated into PLIB.
>
> I herewith propose
6 matches
Mail list logo
