RE: [Flightgear-devel] Re: UDP port into the property tree

2006-02-17 Thread dene maxwell
From: Melchior FRANZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] * dene maxwell -- Friday 17 February 2006 05:53: What port number for write ? What port number for read? (I prefer confirming protocols) That's called TCP, then. Yes, that's possible. Just run fgfs with --telnet=5500, then you can telnet into it and

RE: [Flightgear-devel] Re: UDP port into the property tree

2006-02-17 Thread dene maxwell
From: Melchior FRANZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] * dene maxwell -- Friday 17 February 2006 10:18: That would suit my needs exactly if; a) I wanted to do it manually b) I could start a telnet session from within VB6 (not saying you can't just I haven't yet) Forget about telnet. It's a normal tcp

RE: [Flightgear-devel] Re: UDP port into the property tree

2006-02-17 Thread dene maxwell
From: Melchior FRANZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] * dene maxwell -- Friday 17 February 2006 10:18: That would suit my needs exactly if; a) I wanted to do it manually b) I could start a telnet session from within VB6 (not saying you can't just I haven't yet) Forget about telnet. It's a normal tcp

RE: [Flightgear-devel] Re: UDP port into the property tree

2006-02-17 Thread dene maxwell
From: Melchior FRANZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] * dene maxwell -- Friday 17 February 2006 10:50: From: Melchior FRANZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Forget about telnet. It's a normal tcp socket connection. That was the second part of my question, what would the syntax be under UDP... the same? It would

RE: [Flightgear-devel] Re: UDP port into the property tree

2006-02-17 Thread dene maxwell
To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Flightgear-devel] Re: UDP port into the property tree Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:04:02 +0100 * Melchior FRANZ -- Friday 17 February 2006 10:57: * dene maxwell -- Friday 17 February 2006 10:50: That was the second part of my question, what would the syntax

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: UDP port into the property tree

2006-02-17 Thread Andy Ross
dene maxwell wrote: Doesn't make the least sense sorry don't understand this ... Telenet being a application layer protocol requires alot more details as to recipient and also alot higher overhead to implement...whereas UDP being a trasport layer protocol is less distinct in is

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: UDP port into the property tree

2006-02-17 Thread dene maxwell
Hi, ... Telenet being a application layer protocol requires alot more details as to recipient and also alot higher overhead to implement...whereas UDP being a trasport layer protocol is less distinct in is destination and requires less overhead to implement. I'm not sure what you mean