Frederic Bouvier wrote:
I know this is preliminary code, but is there a reason why 100% cloud density
doesn't give us overcast rather than scatered/broken as it is now ?
I don't think we want to draw overcast (and cirrus) using 3d clouds but
rather using the existing code, don't we?
Erik
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Andy Ross wrote:
Just nocied this on the simgear-cvslogs list. If I read this
correctly, this is still a "terrible" bug, and even worse because it
will be much harder to detect and correct in the future. The FOV is a
dynamically settable property. Hardcoding a particular v
Josh Babcock wrote:
Mostyn Gale wrote:
In the meantime I will just do a few warmup projects, i.e. A Robinson
R22,
Piper PA25 Pawnee and Cessna 152. Information can be found on my site at
www.geocities.com/flightgearproject.
Bravo, and feel free to ask any questions at all. A lot of plane design
Erik Hofman wrote
>
> Frederic Bouvier wrote:
>
> > I know this is preliminary code, but is there a reason why 100% cloud
> density
> > doesn't give us overcast rather than scatered/broken as it is now ?
>
> I don't think we want to draw overcast (and cirrus) using 3d clouds but
> rather using t
I was up all morning watching it. =)
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/825950/L/
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/825949/L/
Ampere
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightge
http://www.airbus.com/A380/Seeing/indexminisite.aspx
Click on Discover, then Videos for the video of the take off.
Ampere
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f5
Quoting Erik Hofman:
> Frederic Bouvier wrote:
>
> > I know this is preliminary code, but is there a reason why 100% cloud
> density
> > doesn't give us overcast rather than scatered/broken as it is now ?
>
> I don't think we want to draw overcast (and cirrus) using 3d clouds but
> rather using th
Quoting "Ampere K. Hardraade" :
> http://www.airbus.com/A380/Seeing/indexminisite.aspx
>
> Click on Discover, then Videos for the video of the take off.
Do you noticed the number of that plane : F-WWOW
-Fred
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgea
Frederic Bouvier
>
> Quoting "Ampere K. Hardraade" :
>
> > http://www.airbus.com/A380/Seeing/indexminisite.aspx
> >
> > Click on Discover, then Videos for the video of the take off.
>
> Do you noticed the number of that plane : F-WWOW
>
> -Fred
>
Hmmm ... BUFF. Well, perhaps not too much U.
Another congratulation is in order -- successful landing.
Ampere
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
* Ampere K. Hardraade -- Wednesday 27 April 2005 14:39:
> Another congratulation is in order -- successful landing.
I'm shocked! How could this happen!? Hasn't that (Boeing founded) study
pointed out basic problems with the A380?
m. :-}
___
Flightgea
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
So the 3d code shouldn't exclude 2d clouds but fade into them.
But if we want to model front one day, it is a thing to ponder now.
Overcast layers are flat at the base but often show towers from the top, at
altitude a 737 or an Airbus are supposed to fly.
I wish we could one
Is there any way to do a repeated image capture in FG? I have thought about
a few things, but none seems to work how I want.
I would like to build a movie, and would start out by just saving snapshots,
then, after I am done, building up the movie.
I thought that I might be able to write a simple s
* Adam Dershowitz -- Thursday 28 April 2005 00:31:
> I tried to run with --jpg-http=5432 but then I get an error "Unkown option".
$ fgfs --verbose --help|grep jpg
--jpg-httpd=port Enable screen shot http server on the
specified
^
You missed the 'd' (for "daemon
Nope, I just missed it in my email (as I missed the "n" in Unknown as well),
not in my actual test.
But, good thought.
It does seem strange to me that the option shows in the verbose help, but
gives an unknown option error when I try it. By the way, I am using version
0.9.8 right now.
Thanks,
>Bravo, and feel free to ask any questions at all. A lot of plane design
right
>now is kind of undocumented, and there are a lot of tips and tricks out
there.
>The website looks good, so does the Robinson model. You will definitely
want a 4
>axis joystick if you are going to play with a helo FDM. A
> * Ampere K. Hardraade -- Wednesday 27 April 2005 14:39:
> > Another congratulation is in order -- successful landing.
>
> I'm shocked! How could this happen!? Hasn't that (Boeing founded) study
> pointed out basic problems with the A380?
>
> m. :-}
I'm not aware that Boeing has claimed any suc
I think the old implementation has some features that the new one is
missing. Of course the new one is better integrated with FG, so that's a
big plus. I'd leave them both for now.
On a related note, I seem to recall MS having some patents on cloud
rendering. They had an article in game developer
Mostyn Gale wrote:
Bravo, and feel free to ask any questions at all. A lot of plane design
right
now is kind of undocumented, and there are a lot of tips and tricks out
there.
The website looks good, so does the Robinson model. You will definitely
want a 4
axis joystick if you are going to play wit
19 matches
Mail list logo
