Jon Stockill wrote:
Boris Koenig wrote:
I like the approach that you're suggesting, it's certainly less
involved and time-consuming than really enabling "on-the-fly" ;-)
modifcation by default, I will have to check the scenerey for the
format that is used, in order to see if I can easily strip the
Boris Koenig wrote:
Jon Stockill wrote:
It's not feasible to dynamically modify the scenery (not in the short
term anyway),
yes, that's what I believe meanwhile, too
however, creating a seperate scenery tree with just the airports in
the Objects tree would achieve one of your goals -
Right, th
Hey Robert: are you back ?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Boris Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
2. put models of the actual navaid transmitters in the scenery.
For what purpose ? :-)
Do you mean to improve situational awareness, so that a 3D model
of a VORTAC is displayed, including the current bear
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 14:18:20 +0200
Boris Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This might be worthwile to consider for the Atlas developers:
> they would merely have to use FlightGear's navaids database
> and fetch the positions of navaids, and OPTIONALLY display
> their symbols at the correspondin
Quoting Boris Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > 2. put models of the actual navaid transmitters in the scenery.
>
> For what purpose ? :-)
>
> Do you mean to improve situational awareness, so that a 3D model
> of a VORTAC is displayed, including the current bearing within
> the outside view wi
David Megginson wrote:
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 10:34:05 +0200, Boris Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have actually already looked for symbols online, but probably
one would have to draw new ones, in order to be able to release
them under the GPL - vector images would be also neat, so that
they can
