Would it be possible to start logging and saving (and publishing) MP
messages somewhere so a person with a grievance would have some hard
evidence to show what happened. Right now when push comes to shove,
we are
in a he said/she said situation. But if we logged every message
+ call
just a small idea:
why can't we use the flightgear phpbb forum accounts ?
we already have a table containing users/emails/md5 passwords. the server
could check for an user/password against this table (ok, not with a direct
connection to the mysql db, but calling an ad-hoc php page that verifies
As a guy who gets insulted about every second day while trying to
enforce proper ATC onto everybody approaching EDDF I surely would
support a system which could solve that problem - if I just had the
slightest idea how to overcome the following questions:
# How can we avoid that somebody (who
Hi All,
I would just like to drop a note here, announcing that FSWeekend, the
largest flight simulation event in Europe is coming up again. As in
previous years, the event will be organized in the Aviodrome, the aviation
museum at Lelystad (EHLE) airport, in the Netherlands. This year,
Curtis Olson wrote:
Another thought. I know it would be a huge effort to setup a system with
user id's and passwords, self registration, [...]
^
To be honest, I'd expect those who deliberately are being rude will
just create a new account after
It would not be dissimilar from the forum, or the wiki or any other CMS.
All those systems need to deal with user management and authentication, and
as soon as the flightgear MP starts ruling the world, we'll probably see
spambots too. Once we start attracting spammers then do we still consider
That stuff is unnecessary and in
real life you'd probably get your license yanked if you were caught using
foul language on the radio.
Here, in Canada , its a $5000 fine and/or a year in jail.That,s a
pretty good deterrent :).
When I had my first engine failure in RL, I remember not
?How about two systems? An introductory/open system, and a second system
available only to those people who have not abused the first?
(I won't go into practical details, it's just the basic idea I'm tentatively
proposing. It could be a complete non-runner for fundamental reasons I'm not
aware
On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 13:58:35 +0200, Torsten wrote in message
201010201358.35298.tors...@t3r.de:
Hi All,
I would just like to drop a note here, announcing that FSWeekend,
the largest flight simulation event in Europe is coming up again.
As in previous years, the event will be organized
Torsten Dreyer wrote:
If you were still looking for an excuse to fly into Amsterdam and visit
FSWeekend, this machine definitely is one!
s/Amsterdam/Lelystad/
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
Torsten Dreyer wrote:
We met the nice guys of Thomas-Krenn AG at this year's LinuxTag where we were
almost booth neighbours. Durk, Martin and I visited the their headquarter a
few weeks ago.
thanks to Torsten and his wife, without whose generous support
the entire trip would have been
On 10/20/2010 7:39 AM, Curtis Olson wrote:
It would not be dissimilar from the forum, or the wiki or any other
CMS. All those systems need to deal with user management and
authentication, and as soon as the flightgear MP starts ruling the
world, we'll probably see spambots too. Once we
Hi all,
L Francesco wrote:
why can't we use the flightgear phpbb forum accounts ?
we already have a table containing users/emails/md5 passwords. the server
could check for an user/password against this
table (ok, not with a direct connection to the mysql db, but calling an
ad-hoc php
Gene Buckle wrote:
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010, Curtis Olson wrote:
Oh dear ...
http://www.noswearing.com/dictionary
I was going to say that we could probably do a pretty good job at coming up
with a list ourselves, then I saw this site and realized I'm a complete
novice ...
A filter
On Wednesday 20 October 2010 18:57:05 Nathanael Rebsch wrote:
Implementing such a filter on the client side will open your eyes to the
pitfalls of that quite quickly - i'll just compile fg myself, and apply
a patch which disables such a filter - now what you want to do?
security by (client
Stefan Seifert wrote:
On Wednesday 20 October 2010 18:57:05 Nathanael Rebsch wrote:
Implementing such a filter on the client side will open your eyes to the
pitfalls of that quite quickly - i'll just compile fg myself, and apply
a patch which disables such a filter - now what you want to
-Stuart
On 20 Oct 2010, at 18:10, Nathanael Rebsch nathan...@dihedral.de wrote:
Stefan Seifert wrote:
On Wednesday 20 October 2010 18:57:05 Nathanael Rebsch wrote:
Implementing such a filter on the client side will open your eyes to the
pitfalls of that quite quickly - i'll just
On 20 Oct 2010, at 18:10, Nathanael Rebsch wrote:
In that case you bandwidth payload for no good reason.
No worse than at present. As I said earlier, I would also put a filter on the
sender to filter the casual profanity and make our expected standard of
behaviour clear.
IMO a filter is a
Stuart Buchanan wrote:
On 20 Oct 2010, at 18:10, Nathanael Rebsch wrote:
In that case you bandwidth payload for no good reason.
No worse than at present. As I said earlier, I would also put a filter on the
sender to filter the casual profanity and make our expected standard of
On Wed, 20 Oct 2010, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
On 20 Oct 2010, at 18:10, Nathanael Rebsch wrote:
In that case you bandwidth payload for no good reason.
No worse than at present. As I said earlier, I would also put a filter on the
sender to filter the casual profanity and make our expected
On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 21:02 +, Martin Spott wrote:
Curtis Olson wrote:
Would it be bad if a user had a choice between the open free for all we
currently have and a more constrained and managed system (that someone has
taken the time to build and continues to manage.)
No, offering
Scott Hamilton wrote:
On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 21:02 +, Martin Spott wrote:
Whenever/whatever people are going to do about adding authentication
support to MP servers, if they'd consider adding an interface which is
capable of talking to an LDAP directory service (inetOrgPerson LDAP
Object
On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 22:21 +, Martin Spott wrote:
Scott Hamilton wrote:
On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 21:02 +, Martin Spott wrote:
Whenever/whatever people are going to do about adding authentication
support to MP servers, if they'd consider adding an interface which is
capable of
Hi Everybody,
I've been doing some heavy work on Mathias Frohlich's
F/A-18
lately, but I have been forced to postpone my release of the improved
version due to the fact that I cannot find any indication of what
license it is under. I've searched around looking for
24 matches
Mail list logo
