On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Chris O'Neill wrote:
On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 15:45 +0200, Csaba Halász wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
I wonder if it would be worth having a child-friendly MP Group (I
think this term
is easier to understand than usage
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 2:16 AM, Chris O'Neill wrote:
On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 00:28 +0100, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
Here's a first attempt at the dialog:
http://www.nanjika.co.uk/flightgear/mp-display.png
Looks pretty good to me.
So, the user selects their MP group, and the groups they want to
Stuart Buchanan schrieb:
Thanks for the feedback. If anyone else has any views, I'd be very interested
to hear them.
Hello Stuart
Maybe the list should also contain a column group where you can see
which user belongs to which group? Is this possible?
Thanks -Y
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 1:20 AM, Peter Morgan wrote:
Thats cool and will work imho.
Means my kids can select newbie, whilst more experienced users can select
skill levels or wanting levels.
I wonder if it would be worth having a child-friendly MP Group (I
think this term
is easier to
Hi Stuart
sorry that I am that stubborn on this - but somehow I am afraid that
this item could affect our ideas of a free and open community.
And I am glad to see that Rob has similar concerns - and also Peters
aspect of MPmap is making me worry even more - because which ATC does
not also use the
Jörg Emmerich wrote:
[...] Also our Graphical-enthusiasts could
develop nice certificates - even good enough to pinup at the
working-place (and thus help us promote FlightGear!).
There already is such thing. I just have a pile of printed copies which
we've been handing out to our 'students'
Thanks Stuart for the explanation - and I guess I understand now how it
shall work in an event with a group of people having the same goals and
settings (e.g. TGA). Although I still see the possibility that some
(younger or older) kids try to show off by changing their grade and
making as much
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Jörg Emmerich wrote:
Thanks Stuart for the explanation - and I guess I understand now how it
shall work in an event with a group of people having the same goals and
settings (e.g. TGA). Although I still see the possibility that some
(younger or older) kids
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 9:37 PM, Rob Shearman, Jr. wrote:
I too have a few concerns about this proposal, partially due to the inherent
invitation to segregate the community, but also due to the complexity of
the various use-case scenarios, as illustrated by the example you valiantly
attempted
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 10:56 PM, I wrote:
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 9:37 PM, Rob Shearman, Jr. wrote:
I too have a few concerns about this proposal, partially due to the inherent
invitation to segregate the community, but also due to the complexity of
the various use-case scenarios, as
Thats cool and will work imho.
Means my kids can select newbie, whilst more experienced users can select
skill levels or wanting levels.
Also does this mean one can patch the mpmap to hide users aswell ?
pete
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 12:28 AM, Stuart Buchanan stuar...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon,
As someone doing ATC 4 days/week, I would like to bring in another point
of view to this issue:
Very definitely we need such a tool for the environment Stuart described
as the main use-case are pilots wishing to practice .. ATC-controlled
environment. And I agree, those (like e.g. the TGA-events)
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 7:18 AM, Jörg Emmerich wrote:
As someone doing ATC 4 days/week, I would like to bring in another point
of view to this issue:
snip
So my take is:
- yes, we need the ability to lock some people out, if it is getting too
bad
- but do not lock out people because they may
13 matches
Mail list logo
