leee wrote:
It is a sad fact that many people have problems coping with some
events in history, and perhaps the only way that they can
personally deal with them is by putting them away somewhere so that
they don't have to confront them. On a personal level, this is
fine, because it only
I would have responded in this thread but decided not to since it
probably would only add fuel to it. Let stick to that it's tasteless and
realize that FlightGear has no support for weapons of mass murder. So
this mission will end up being merely a sightseeing mission.
Erik
Tatsuhiro Nishioka wrote:
If you agree with me, please help me change his plan.
I do sympathise with your feelings - this plan is pretty much
tasteless, ridiculous. I think the only measure against such plans is
education.
Best regards,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:59:46 +0200, Erik wrote in message
4ab32fe2.4040...@ehofman.com:
I would have responded in this thread but decided not to since it
probably would only add fuel to it. Let stick to that it's tasteless
and realize that FlightGear has no support for weapons of mass
The most depressing thing about this thread is that it highlights
the fact that many people seem to think that the best way to deal
with unpleasant events in history is to mythologise and make them
sacred and untouchable, and then to try to force other people to
comply with their personal
Hi lee, funny enough I mostly agree.
But I'm sorry, it's really easy to ignore you because like some of the
fanbois of the event, you're resorting to demeaning language to speak of
those who don't agree with you, showing exactly the intolerance you're
decrying.
At least, you're not resorting to
First: we are an OpenSource project- open and free to all! We can't preventing
militaries using FGFS to develope military stuff to kill people.
So I don't see a chance to prevent those kids making this event.
But we are allowed to say our opinion about and trying them to convince with
facts
On Friday 18 Sep 2009, Nicolas Quijano wrote:
Hi lee, funny enough I mostly agree.
But I'm sorry, it's really easy to ignore you because like some
of the fanbois of the event, you're resorting to demeaning
language to speak of those who don't agree with you, showing
exactly the intolerance
Lee,
I do agree with all you wrote and started something similar but then
decided I didn' t find this mailinglist the place to discuss it. Still,
I do agree.
Erik
--
Come build with us! The BlackBerryreg; Developer
On Friday 18 Sep 2009, Heiko Schulz wrote:
First: we are an OpenSource project- open and free to all! We
can't preventing militaries using FGFS to develope military
stuff to kill people.
So I don't see a chance to prevent those kids making this event.
But we are allowed to say our opinion
On Friday 18 Sep 2009, Erik Hofman wrote:
Lee,
I do agree with all you wrote and started something similar but
then decided I didn' t find this mailinglist the place to
discuss it. Still, I do agree.
Erik
I agree that this isn't the right place for this discussion but I
was so annoyed
Ieee.
Do not nudge my expressions and thought.
First, I didn't express this is the recreation of the a-bomb raids. That's way
far from what I've said.
Second, I didn't say I ignored many of the posts.
I skipped some meaningless posts on the forum, and I wrote that because I might
have skipped
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009, Tatsuhiro Nishioka wrote:
Hi there,
I found a problematic forum topic on planning an MP event, by which I really
got hurt at least.
http://www.flightgear.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=10t=5761
The plan of the event is to simulate the bombing mission against both
GTA IV sucks. Even if you have an IBM Roadrunner, it'll lag. It's very
badly designed (as with all Rockstar games) ;)
Besides, GTA IV is completely fictional, but the MP event is *loosely*
based on a real, tragic, event. I was going to join it, just to fly
around. The plane I was going to
Tatsuhiro Nishioka wrote:
Hi there,
I found a problematic forum topic on planning an MP event, by which I really
got hurt at least.
http://www.flightgear.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=10t=5761
The plan of the event is to simulate the bombing mission against both
Hiroshima and Nagasaki
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Gene Buckle wrote:
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009, Tatsuhiro Nishioka wrote:
Hi there,
I found a problematic forum topic on planning an MP event, by which I
really got hurt at least.
http://www.flightgear.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=10t=5761
The plan of the
On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 13:29 -0700, Gene Buckle wrote:
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009, Tatsuhiro Nishioka wrote:
Hi there,
I found a problematic forum topic on planning an MP event, by which I
really got hurt at least.
http://www.flightgear.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=10t=5761
The plan of the
On Thu, 17 Sep 2009, Victhor Foster wrote:
GTA IV sucks. Even if you have an IBM Roadrunner, it'll lag. It's very
badly designed (as with all Rockstar games) ;)
Besides, GTA IV is completely fictional, but the MP event is *loosely*
based on a real, tragic, event. I was going to join it, just
You have my full support on this, Tat.
To those who say , its just a game, get over it
1) It's a sim
It's a simulation game. Is it used for serious research? You bet!
However, it's also used as entertainment.
2) We are talking about the greatest mass murder of civilians in a
single act in
Tasteless? Oh probably. But then again, so is Grand Theft Auto IV.
It's a game. Get over it.
Hey Gene,
I know you've been around long enough that if you spent 30 seconds pondering
your answer, you could probably come up with a little bit better one?
Flip it around ... can you
Tasteless? Oh probably. But then again, so is Grand Theft Auto IV.
It's a game. Get over it.
g.
I am, and have been, against the militarization of flightgear in
general. I'm depressed by the seeming growing number of people who want
to push flightgear into a game and wargame
21 matches
Mail list logo
