Bug report for Fop [2004/11/07]

2004-11-07 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

RE: aXSL (Was: RE: Exceptions. (Was: AreaFactory patch))

2004-11-07 Thread Andreas L. Delmelle
-Original Message- From: Victor Mote [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Jeremias Maerki wrote: Hi guys, (Just catching up on the postings of the last few days, this one caught my eye...) although I'm still a bit concerned that you based your PDF part on the maintenance branch code

Re: FOP Web Site Update

2004-11-07 Thread Clay Leeds
On Nov 7, 2004, at 6:46 AM, Glen Mazza wrote: Clay Leeds wrote: On a related note, IIRC I wanted to change the color scheme to Red - Amber - Green (stop light analogy: No - Partial - Full compliance--I'm aware of the argument about something either being compliant or it's not ;-)) That's fine --

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32107] New: - Move FOP wiki to secure

2004-11-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32107. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

RE: aXSL (Was: RE: Exceptions. (Was: AreaFactory patch))

2004-11-07 Thread Victor Mote
Andreas L. Delmelle wrote: Victor, IIC, Jeremias' concern is about the PDF lib in HEAD containing substantial improvements over the code in the maintenance branch. One aspect that springs to mind is WRT encryption support --as I recall, maintenance still had some problems with this, for

Re: cvs commit: xml-fop/src/documentation/content/xdocs/dev book.xml

2004-11-07 Thread Clay Leeds
Simon, Does the book.xml file in your DnI section serve any specific purpose (DnI-related), or is it to follow the common coding/forrest convention? I ask, because the use of book.xml is deprecated in Forrest-0.6 in favor of the site-wide src/documentation/content/xdocs/site.xml file. On Nov