Clay Leeds wrote:
Thanks for the respectful response. I'm aware that HEAD release is
adversely affected by MAINTENANCE work (hence the I don't want to start
a ware here, but... :-)), however, I posted this for a few of reasons:
1) fop-dev team might discuss this in light of the possibility of
J.Pietschmann wrote:
Well, we could release the current CVS as 0.20.5.1. The table memory
fix is probably important to many users. THere is a slo a minor fix
concerning leader expansion there.
Okay, but you said yourself that the adjustments you made to tables has
probably broken some other
I don't want to start a war here, but if ( that's a big if) we're
going to go through the hassle of doing an RC, does it make sense to
insert any new functionality into FOP, like TIF output? I
understand Oleg Tkachenko's work for TIF is complete (or nearly
complete), but (like many PATCHes)
Clay Leeds wrote:
I don't want to start a war here, but if ( that's a big if) we're
going to go through the hassle of doing an RC, does it make sense to
insert any new functionality into FOP, like TIF output? I understand
Oleg Tkachenko's work for TIF is complete (or nearly complete), but
On Jan 7, 2004, at 7:46 AM, Chris Bowditch wrote:
Clay Leeds wrote:
I don't want to start a war here, but if ( that's a big if) we're
going to go through the hassle of doing an RC, does it make sense to
insert any new functionality into FOP, like TIF output? I
understand Oleg Tkachenko's work
-Original Message-
From: Chris Bowditch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip /
I understand the desire to add new features like the Tif generator into
the maintenance code. However, doing so would mean effort is distracted
away from HEAD development. The sooner we can do a release from
On Jan 7, 2004, at 12:07 PM, J.Pietschmann wrote:
It works for me for generating PDF for quite some time. I get NPE when
reloading a FO source in the AWT appilcation, but this maz have other
reasons, I didn't try to track it down.
As long as I can remember I got NPE when clicking the [Reload]
Chris Bowditch wrote:
Thus, I just wanted to know if some sort of 0.20.6 release will be
upcoming in the future
No, no further releases are planned from the maintenance branch, and all
development is focused on CVS Head.
Well, we could release the current CVS as 0.20.5.1. The table memory
fix is
