Glen Mazza wrote:
Yes, an explanation in Bugzilla on what the patches
are for (I haven't been following the thread, and if
it takes some weeks to be applied, no one will
remember what they're for.) You're welcome to provide
a link to the FOP archives to cut down on re-typing.
Ok - Ive added
Eliot Kimber wrote:
Since the OpenType font metrics wouldn't include the kerning I don't
know if it would be useful for full FOP, but it should be sufficient to
allow basic font metrics for CFF OpenType fonts.
Sounds good, i'm sure it will be useful for FOP even within kerning.
I haven't had a
Eliot (mostly),
On Jan 8, 2004, at 1:24 AM, Chris Bowditch wrote:
Eliot Kimber wrote:
Since the OpenType font metrics wouldn't include the kerning I don't
know if it would be useful for full FOP, but it should be sufficient
to allow basic font metrics for CFF OpenType fonts.
Sounds good, i'm
Sorry about the fragment at the end of the main paragraph I wrote below
(darned TouchPad on my laptop is too sensitive... erm.. and I wasn't
paying close enough attention). Anyway, I don't have anything to add...
On Jan 8, 2004, at 6:50 AM, Clay Leeds wrote:
Eliot Kimber wrote:
I haven't had a
Chris Bowditch wrote:
Eliot Kimber wrote:
Since the OpenType font metrics wouldn't include the kerning I don't
know if it would be useful for full FOP, but it should be sufficient
to allow basic font metrics for CFF OpenType fonts.
Sounds good, i'm sure it will be useful for FOP even within
From man diff
SYNOPSIS
diff [options] from-file to-file
..
OPTIONS
..
-u Use the unified output format.
The command I use to generate a unified diff is:
diff -u from-file to-file
I'm guessing (as I'm no CVS or diff expert!) you'll have to do this for
each file unless you
Clay Leeds wrote:
It's just a thought (and I'm not trying to look a gift-horse in the
mouth! :-)), but perhaps you could work with those working on the HEAD
branch, to make a unified diff for all changed file against HEAD.
It appears that the relevant files are identical in the HEAD and maint
-Original Message-
From: Eliot Kimber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip /
It appears that the relevant files are identical in the HEAD and maint
branches.
Could be... After all, fonts were next on the redesign schedule. It
definitely will not hurt to enter the patch anyway.
Just to
Eliot Kimber wrote:
Clay Leeds wrote:
It's just a thought (and I'm not trying to look a gift-horse in the
mouth! :-)), but perhaps you could work with those working on the HEAD
branch, to make a unified diff for all changed file against HEAD.
It appears that the relevant files are identical
-Original Message-
From: Eliot Kimber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip /
Doh! It appears that I was developing against the head and not the maint
branch--not sure how that happened.
Did you run the diff w/o using any tags in particular? IIC if you don't, cvs
runs a diff against the
Eliot Kimber wrote:
Doh! It appears that I was developing against the head and not the maint
branch--not sure how that happened. I'm looking now to see if my head
code can be quickly retrofitted to the maint branch.
Ok, I was able to patch the maint files as well (for real this time) and
both
Eliot Kimber wrote:
Ok, I was able to patch the maint files as well (for real this time) and
both it and the head seem to work fine, which I would expect since all
my code really does is not read a couple of tables if the font is
OpenType CFF.
I will prepare diffs forthwith.
Ok, I have
--- Eliot Kimber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let me know if you need more from me on these
patches.
Cheers,
Eliot
Yes, an explanation in Bugzilla on what the patches
are for (I haven't been following the thread, and if
it takes some weeks to be applied, no one will
remember what they're
The OpenType reader code is in TTFReader. OpenType is an evolution of
TrueType. Maybe you could try to use the TTFReader from 0.20.5. The HEAD
TTFReader should be at least equal in functionality but I can't be sure
we got all fixes for 0.20.5 into HEAD already.
Good luck!
On 07.01.2004 02:12:38
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
The OpenType reader code is in TTFReader. OpenType is an evolution of
TrueType. Maybe you could try to use the TTFReader from 0.20.5. The HEAD
TTFReader should be at least equal in functionality but I can't be sure
we got all fixes for 0.20.5 into HEAD already.
Cool--what
Eliot Kimber wrote:
snip/
Cool--what tag do I use to checkout the 0.20.5? I'm not sure I
completely understood what the FOP CVS information was telling me.
The tag you need is:
fop-0_20_2-maintain
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Eliot Kimber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip /
I think where I'm stuck is on what code actually takes a font and
generates a metrics file from it. I've traced down to where the XML
font metrics files are loaded but it appears that the font metrics files
just
-Original Message-
From: Andreas L. Delmelle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip /
I think the explanation of registering the fonts contains just
Ahem... incorrect estimate. More like --well, the metrics stuff :)
Cheers,
Andreas
Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
Hope this helps!
It did. If I understand what AWTFontMetrics is doing, I can just use
that class directly, or adapt that code for more standalone use. I will
explore that route.
Thanks,
Eliot
--
W. Eliot Kimber
Professional Services
Innodata Isogen
9030 Research
Eliot Kimber wrote:
Here's my problem: during XSLT processing to generate FO instances I
need to be able to make a reasonable guess as to the rendered length of
a given string so that I can do some simple automatic copy fitting, such
as setting the list label width to fit the longest item in a
Eliot Kimber wrote:
Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
Hope this helps!
It did. If I understand what AWTFontMetrics is doing, I can just use
that class directly, or adapt that code for more standalone use. I will
explore that route.
This turned out to be much easier than I realized, at least for
Eliot Kimber wrote:
include all the TrueType fonts. It appears that Java 1.4 includes
OpenType support but 1.4 is not an option for me at the moment.
I tried the TTFReader on my OpenType font and it died in ReadGlyf() :-(
I see in a message from Victor Mote from July of 2003 that he had an
22 matches
Mail list logo
