Peter B. West wrote:
I've started a blog as a diary of Defoe development and, at
the moment, my learning experiences with Java 5.0, especially
Typesafe Enums and Generics. If you drop in there from time
to time, you can see what I am up to. Have you considered
one for FOray?
I
I think it would be helpful for you both to include an 'examples'
section on your site to display the fruits of your labor (w links to
the FOs that generated them!).
On Oct 29, 2004, at 5:02 AM, Victor Mote wrote:
Peter B. West wrote:
I've started a blog as a diary of Defoe development and, at
Clay Leeds wrote:
I think it would be helpful for you both to include an 'examples'
section on your site to display the fruits of your labor (w
links to the FOs that generated them!).
That is a good idea. The FOray web site started out thinking of itself as an
extension of the FOP website
I'd meant to comment on this before, but was hoping for a little
discussion from other FOP committers. Perhaps I was waiting until the
body got even 'colder'...
Speaking for myself, I want to be clear that I (and I assume others)
feel very fortunate to have had the benefit of the work of Peter
Clay,
Thanks for the comments. I would be interested to see the alt-design
doco running under the new Forrest regime before it is removed, because
I would like to take advantage of your hard work in coming to terms with
Forrest. It was difficult to get the documentation working in the
I'd be happy to help out! Of course, since it appears to be moving
anyway, it might be easier for me to move your documentation to a new
forrest install and go from there. Either way, I'm happy to do what I
can. (IOW pile it on! :-p)
Web Maestro Clay
On Oct 28, 2004, at 2:00 PM, Peter B. West
Thanks Clay. Please disregard deeply unworthy comment on a previous
message.
Peter
Clay Leeds wrote:
I'd be happy to help out! Of course, since it appears to be moving
anyway, it might be easier for me to move your documentation to a new
forrest install and go from there. Either way, I'm happy
--- Clay Leeds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Speaking for myself, I want to be clear that I (and
I assume others)
feel very fortunate to have had the benefit of the
work of Peter B.
West on the alt.design portion of FOP. With the
possibility of Peter
moving on to work with Defoe, I just
On Oct 28, 2004, at 3:21 PM, Glen Mazza wrote:
--- Clay Leeds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Speaking for myself, I want to be clear that I (and
I assume others)
feel very fortunate to have had the benefit of the
work of Peter B.
West on the alt.design portion of FOP. With the
possibility of Peter
Peter:
I too wish you the best of luck with Defoe and with whatever your future FOP
involvement may be. One of my motivations with the modularization work was
to make room for the competing ideas, mostly yours, to share what could be
shared. This may help explain my frustration at your opposition
Victor,
Thank you for the compliments. It's interesting to see the development
of a multiple approaches, and the strength with which differing views
are held.
I've started a blog as a diary of Defoe development and, at the moment,
my learning experiences with Java 5.0, especially Typesafe
Best of luck with Defoe!
And, ummm, if you could pardon me for not waiting
until the body is cold (Well
OK...98.3...98.1...97.9--there! Practically an ice
cube now... ;), I think we should have the Alt-Design
tab moved off the FOP website and on to Defoe's, and
place a link instead on our
Fops,
I originally thought I was replying to an offline message here. Hence
the unusual tone.
Peter
Peter B. West wrote:
Finn,
No, it hasn't been made yet.
...
Finn Bock wrote:
Hi Peter,
Did I miss the announcement?
http://defoe.sourceforge.net/
regards,
finn
Finn,
No, it hasn't been made yet. I don't see much point in announcing it
until I have a more substantial framework. The other developers are
guys who have expressed an interest, but haven't actually become
involved yet, so it's all pretty new. I've just set up a blog at
14 matches
Mail list logo
