Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> I think you misunderstood. I wanted to suggest transferring (not
> copying/forking) these parts over to Apache with you as a
> committer in the Commons part. That would make it mostly your
> decision. I'm all against duplication of efforts. Actually,
> it was the motiva
I think you misunderstood. I wanted to suggest transferring (not
copying/forking) these parts over to Apache with you as a committer in
the Commons part. That would make it mostly your decision. I'm all
against duplication of efforts. Actually, it was the motivation for this
post. At Apache you'd h
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> Thanks for bringing this up. I almost forgot.
>
> I'd be in favor of integrating Victor's improvements in this area.
> However, I'd also be inclined to gently nudge you, Victor, to
> bring the font stuff back to Apache into the XML Graphics
> Commons area once that's se
Thanks for bringing this up. I almost forgot.
I'd be in favor of integrating Victor's improvements in this area.
However, I'd also be inclined to gently nudge you, Victor, to bring the
font stuff back to Apache into the XML Graphics Commons area once that's
set up. But I wouldn't have a problem to
(Comments inline)
On 27.02.2005 23:51:25 bugzilla wrote:
> I've been working on the AWTRenderer those last days. Before I move forward, I
> would welcome some feedback to know if I'm heading in the right direction.
I think you are. Interesting work. Keep it up!
> = What I did =
>
> Basically, I
Renaud Richardet wrote (in Bugzilla):
> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33760
>
>Summary: [Patch] current AWTRenderer
>Product: Fop
>Version: 1.0dev
...
> = Points I would like to discuss (see the corresponding FIXME
> in the code) =
>
> F
I'm +1 on that. It's something I remember mentioning myself. I heard
people say that this is best pratice not to have build.sh/bat.
On 26.02.2005 14:14:21 Glen Mazza wrote:
> Team,
>
> Build.bat and build.sh just call "ant" internally
> today (and tell them to get Ant if it is not available
> on
Simon Pepping wrote:
>+=== Space specifiers ===
>+
>+When the space specifiers resolve to zero around a page break, we are
>+in the same situation as that of a word space in line breaking. It is
>+represented by the sequence `box - glue - box`.
I add just a few thoughts about this subject.
If t
