J.Pietschmann wrote:
Victor Mote wrote:
No. Courier-Bold-Italic would be the Typeface, Courier would be the
TypefaceFamily. So my Font object that gets used by FOP would be
Courier-Bold-Italic at 12 points. It has a parent Typeface,
which represents
the Courier-Bold font file and its
Victor Mote wrote:
Same general concept, except I think there is a separate class for font
metrics in that system. If I can ever find a way to get to the physical file
(or some representation of it) through java.awt.Font (for embedding), we
would use it along with our other font scheme.
I believe
Simon Pepping wrote:
These days everybody uses scalable fonts, but in principle it is
possible that Courier-Bold-Italic at 10 points is a different font
than Courier-Bold-Italic at 20 points, with a different metric file
and different glyphs. The canonical example being of course TeX, with
(disclaimer: Due to lack of time and a hardware failure, I haven't read
everything, yet)
I don't think we can rely on java.awt.Font. A FOP-defined Font
interfaces is necessary to really make sure FOP gets what it need. What
we came up with on the Wiki pretty much shows my ideas for the font
J.Pietschmann wrote:
I believe we should just define a fop.Font interface which is
the same as awt.Font, then provide implementations fop.AWTFont,
fop.PDFFont (well all the variations), fop.Type1Font etc. A
configurable selector (an Avalon selector) could selcet them.
This way people could
Joe DeVivo wrote:
I just stumbled on to Fop earlier this week and it looks like something
I can really get into working on. I've been looking at the source and
Good choice. I think FOP is one of the coolest projects imaginable.
getting my feet wet, like with the patch I just submitted for
Team,
I'm having difficulty applying Peter Herweg's latest
RTF patch--for some reason my Windows patch tool is
going into infinite loops while trying to process it
(The problem could be the patch file itself or how I'm
using the patch tool--I'm not sure.) Will someone
else take over the patch?
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24852.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hehe, Eclipse provides a nice interface to work around the problem in no
time. The problem was that the patch was somehow made from the parent
directory of the xml-fop module. Eclipse (and maybe even patch, but I
haven't checked) provides a function that lets you snip a certain number
of path
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24906.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I love Eclipse despite little deficiencies:
- I constantly use Eclipse's CVS functions and the only problem I
experience is my difficulty with the merge function which can sometimes
be troublesome.
- Missing remove trailing spaces function.
- NPE in PDFWArray inside Eclipse (don't know whether
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24906.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
jeremias2003/11/22 11:48:21
Modified:src/java/org/apache/fop/tools/anttasks Fop.java
Log:
New feature for the Ant task: relativebase=true uses the directory of each FO-file
in a fileset as basedir. This is in contrast to the general basedir parameter.
Submitted by: Joe DeVivo
jeremias2003/11/22 11:49:29
Modified:examples/fo build.xml
Log:
Using Joe's new relativebase feature, this file can be simplified.
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +1 -17 xml-fop/examples/fo/build.xml
Index: build.xml
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24906.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
15 matches
Mail list logo
